SKIVT-L Archives

August 2012, Week 4

SKIVT-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Get Skied <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Skiing Discussion and Snow Reports <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:58:57 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1424 bytes) , text/html (1826 bytes)
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Matthew Kulas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> So Lance Armstrong is now officially guilty of doping.  Many people have
> opposed the USADA's case because of the resulting complication of
> redetermining the results of those races that Armstrong had supposedly won,
> which is a pathetic argument against pursing doping violations.  The best
> answer--there is no great solution--is to say that there are no official
> results for the Tour for the following years: 1996-2006, 2010.


It would be much more difficult than anointing a new single season homerun
king (Maris) or all time record holder (Aaron), that's for sure. Everyone
in the pro peloton was using PEDs in the 1996-2006 period. Armstrong just
happened to use them to the greatest possible advantage, whether through
better chemistry, better physiology or both.

Armstrong's tour highlights ultimately belong in the same highlight reel as
Mark McGwire's monstrous home runs - examples of what superhuman things are
possible by humans with an extra artificial boost. Entertaining video for
sure.

What's clear is that the public hates dopers who also lack contrition; Andy
Pettite is but one example of how a doper who apologizes for his sins can
avoid a public flogging.

Evan

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2