Weekend before last I tried a pair of B4s while my buddie's daughter
(10 years old, 100 lbs, rips!) was on B3Ws in 150 (152?). The Ws were
lighter and a little less damp than the men's version, but still
tracked very well in crud and hardpack. While we spent most of the
day in the woods, she was launching everything in sight when in the
open while still stemming through the icier bits.

She wants a pair.

Naive question: Is there any advantage to a 'tele' ski when using AT
bindings?

g

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:02:53 -0500
Roger Klinger <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:59:29 -0500, Roger Klinger <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >So 2 skis we were thinking of were the Karhu Betty and the Rossignol Hip Chick.
> 
> I meant to say the G3 Siren and Rossi Hip Chick.  As I understand it, the Betty isn't so hot on 
> firmer snow.
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html


-- 
pub  1024D/081ECB85 1999-04-09 
George Bakos <[log in to unmask]>
Key fingerprint = D646 8F91 F795 27EC FF8B  8C95 B102 9EB2 081E CB85

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html