SKIVT-L Archives

July 1999, Week 5

SKIVT-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kijak, Stephen" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Skiing Discussion and Snow Reports <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 10:10:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Scott,
From the ridgeline down(west) Saddleback ski area owns ~11,000 acres. I
believe that the land from the ridgeline to the east is owned by a timber
company. The AT traverses this area (and much of Maine) with the permission
of the landowners.

Actually the ATC supports Alternative 2. Why do you reject this alternative?
Steve Kijak


                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Scott Mortimer [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
                Sent:   Thursday, July 29, 1999 6:36 PM
                To:     [log in to unmask]
                Subject:        [SKIVT-L] More Saddleback discussion

                I wasn't aware that the AT people are trying to stop
development on
                     land already owned by Saddleback, that certainly
doesn't seem fair.
                     But when it comes down to it, I'd rather have the
mountain close and
                     hike the trails then have it turned into a 14-lift
mega-area.  And
                     with Alternative 1, they've got plenty of killer
terrain to add lifts
                     and trails.  Vote now!

                     Scott



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2