SKIVT-L Archives

December 2004, Week 1

SKIVT-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Terwilliger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Skiing Discussion and Snow Reports <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:30:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
It would seem that the perceived availability of said women for
apres-ski activities (and the single-ness of said men) would also
enter into the equation.

Paul


On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:05:11 -0500, Dan wrote:

> Chris Kohler wrote on 12/7/04 9:58 AM:
>
> >> McCammon reports that groups that include women appear to expose
> >> themselves to greater risk than those without
>
> Two assumptions, 1 question.
>
> Assumption #1. Most women would claim they would be more impressed by a guy
> with the sense to say, "no, this doesn't look safe, I don't think we should
> ski it."
>
> Assumption #2. Most men think most women would be more impressed by a guy
> with the sllab to say, "woo hoo, I'm gonna ski it, you can come if you
> want."
>
> Question: Who's right?
>
> --tn
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.
>
> To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2