Hypothetically speaking, if you perform competency testing on a daily or near
daily basis will this fulfill the new ARDMS requirement for a recertification competency exam being pursued by ARDMS?
Hope everyone is having a good weekend.
BW
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:41:16 -0400, Paul English
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Back when I started doing vascular (25+ years ago, pre color, I believe in the
plethezoic era LOL) no one was even talking about valvular competency
testing. I studied the ancient tomes, Strandness, Hershey/Sumner/Barnes,
etc., and when I sat for my RVT exams I studied Kremkau and used the Burwin
Institute materials. This was in the mid 90's, one of the last exams given on
paper just before computer based testing started. Anyway, in none of these
materials nor on the registry exam was competency mentioned except for some
fleeting references to indirect testing. Where I work now, several of my
colleagues are taking their RVT exams and they have indicated there is more
information included in the study materials regarding competency and there are
even a few questions on the exam about it.
>
>
>That all being said, I was first asked to do competency testing in the mid to
late 90's as a part of mapping the greater saphenous vein for pre-CABG
assessment. Then I went to San Angelo, TX, where the radiologists started up
an EVLT and sclerotherapy services. Out pre-procedure protocol was to do a
standard DVT evaluation and a competency evaluation of the deep and
superficial vessels including perforator assessment.
>
>
>If the patient's legs and/or lower abdomen are not too large, I use proximal
compression to assess competency. I use valsalva when the leg is so large
proximally to the interrogation site that adequate cannot be exerted to properly
assess competency. I also slow the sweep speed down enough to allow for
documentation of phasicity, proximal compression (or valsalva), and distal
compression for augmentation.
>
>
>I use the above methods to evaluate competency on every lower extremity
venous exam I do for the deep system. I reverse Trendelenburg the bed and
assess from the saphenofemoral junction through the popliteal and then the
distal ankle vessels. I label the waveform PHASIC, PROX (or VALSALVA), and
DIST. With the slow sweep speed all of these segments can be documented
on a single waveform. Since there is no specific CPT code for insufficiency
evaluations the reimbursement is the same. When the order is specifically for
insufficiency I add to the above a competency evaluation of the entire greater
and lesser saphenous exams.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
>http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
>
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
|