Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - UVMFLOWNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

UVMFLOWNET Archives

December 2010

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
UVMFLOWNET Home UVMFLOWNET Home
UVMFLOWNET December 2010

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Flow volume reference to bypass grafts
From:
Joe Swenson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:45:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
I have Duplexed + Physioed several fem-pop bypass graft patients, at 6 month 
intervals, for a year--most with synthetic CFA to above knee popliteal BPG's. 
ABI and TBI data in some patients show fluccuating (mild to moderate up and 
down index results) while PVR/PPG are most consistent. Considered the 
obvious operartor dependent issues, but am confident in my consistency, and 
am considering and searching for other explanations or experiences that may 
offer explanation for ABI/TBI variation in f-p F/U's.  Also interested in any BPG 
flow volume references/experience that others may have.

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV