UVMFLOWNET Archives

November 2002

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Ossama Youssef." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 20:27:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Hi Roger,
I didn't say vascular surgeons can't interpret. I simply think cardiologists overall are better at scanning and interpretation than vascular surgeons overall.
I'm an RVT, so I certainly know that vascular technology involves quite a lot more than carotids. I'm talking about cardiologists who don't just interpret but also perform renal artery duplex and transcranial duplex exams, not just simple venouses and carotids.
I'm sorry you misinterpreted my comments. I was talking about the probable advantages of combined cardiovascular labs.
Happy Thanksgiving,
Ossama

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2