Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - UVMFLOWNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

UVMFLOWNET Archives

November 2002

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
UVMFLOWNET Home UVMFLOWNET Home
UVMFLOWNET November 2002

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: COMBINED ECHO/VASCULAR or ULTRASOUND VASCULAR
From:
"Ossama Youssef." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 20:27:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Hi Roger,
I didn't say vascular surgeons can't interpret. I simply think cardiologists overall are better at scanning and interpretation than vascular surgeons overall.
I'm an RVT, so I certainly know that vascular technology involves quite a lot more than carotids. I'm talking about cardiologists who don't just interpret but also perform renal artery duplex and transcranial duplex exams, not just simple venouses and carotids.
I'm sorry you misinterpreted my comments. I was talking about the probable advantages of combined cardiovascular labs.
Happy Thanksgiving,
Ossama

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV