December 2008


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Heather S Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
VGBN Discussion <[log in to unmask]>, Heather S Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:00:59 -0500
text/plain (1324 bytes) , text/html (2463 bytes)
Oil: too valuable to burn.
Some would argue that now is the time to make best use of petroleum based or
petroleum reliant products for things such as super-insulation for
retro-fits (in new construction thicker walls are an option not requiring
the high R" of foam), or for infrastructure projects such as irrigation
piping, PV panels, et al. Whenever remotely possible: local,
renewable/regenerative, low-impact, and low toxicity should still always be
the preferred technique. After all, there's only a limited supply. Just a

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Michelle Smith Mullarkey
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>  Point taken.  I admittedly was thinking of products like Icynene vs.
> straw, but it seems fossil fuels really are part of our entire world.
> On 12/10/2008 6:21 PM, Robert Riversong wrote:
>   --- On *Wed, 12/10/08, Michelle Smith Mullarkey <[log in to unmask]><[log in to unmask]>
> * wrote:
> * Fossil fuel is still used to manufacture and transport the majority of
> green building products (not natural building products such as straw
> bales)... *
> **
> *I'm afraid that fossil fuels are used for the production of most straw
> and since some of it is coming from Canada, there's also transportation
> costs. "Natural" building materials are not necessarily immune from the
> environmental costs of other materials. *