Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - VTBIRD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

VTBIRD Archives

September 2007

VTBIRD@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
VTBIRD Home VTBIRD Home
VTBIRD September 2007

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: another optics question
From:
Jason Guerard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vermont Birds <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:31:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Kevin,

While the Swifts remain to be an excellent pair of bins, a lot has changed in the way of binocular manufacture technology in the last 8-10 years. 

There are numerous pairs to choose from in the price range you mention ($300-500).  One thing I will caution, it is very important to handle the binoculars you wish to purchase before you buy.  Many people have no second thoughts about buying sight unseen.  You wouldn't buy a car without a test drive, right?  And, in my opinion,  the feel of the binocular is just as important as the optical quality.  After all, you could have the finest glass and coatings in the world but if the bins don't feel good in the hand or are too heavy, you probably won't want to use them.

Aside from Swift, you might look into the following manufacturers who produce high quality optics in your price range;  (in no particular order) Zeiss, Kowa, Vortex, Leupold, Bushnell, Minox, Steiner and Nikon.  My guess is that you'll have twice as many makes and models to choose from in comparison to when you originally purchased your Swifts.  One additional note; if you can make the jump to $600-800, there are some superb optics which rival the top end glass.

I second the earlier close focus comment.  Birder's are continually finding the joys of butterfly watching.  Just make sure the parallax is not too bad. 

Hopefully this helps aid your decision just a little.  

Good luck,

Jason Guerard
Sales Manager
New Jersey Audubon Society
Cape May Bird Observatory
Northwood Center
701 E. Lake Drive, P.O. Box 3
Cape May Point, NJ  USA  08212-003
Ph: 609-884-2736  Fx: 609-884-6052
www.BirdCapeMay.org
www.njaudubon.org

Take A Kid Birding®

 Subject: another optics question
From: Kevin Cross <kevc AT GMAVT.NET>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:32:33 -0400

On the way to Algonquin last week, my beloved Swift Ultra Lites  
(8x42, the old design, paid $200 about 8 years ago) were stolen from  
our vehicle. I always thought the clarity and light-gathering of the  
Swifts were as good as binos costing quite a bit more.

As I research a replacement, I'd love to hear what folks like in the  
mid-range, say $300-500.

I'll be sure to check the archives for previous threads. Please  
respond off-list if you prefer...

Thanks,
Kevin Cross
Richmond

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV