LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  January 2000

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE January 2000

Subject:

Rape confers selective advantage (just when you think things can't get worse...)

From:

Ivan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 15 Jan 2000 11:13:01 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (293 lines)

        New York Times
        January 15, 2000


        What Provokes a Rapist to Rape?
        Scientists Debate Notion of an
        Evolutionary Drive

        By ERICA GOODE

        Rape is primarily a crime of violence and power, not
        sex. Or so a generation of social scientists and
        feminist scholars have argued.

        But in a forthcoming book, two
        evolutionary scientists say this
        view is born of ideology, not
        science, and is "based on
        empirically erroneous, even
        mythological, ideas about human
        development, behavior and
        psychology."

        In fact, they assert in "A Natural
        History of Rape: Biological Bases
        of Sexual Coercion," that rape "is
        in its very essence a sexual act"
        and that the practice may have
        evolved because it confers an
        evolutionary advantage.

        All of which, given the current passion for pulling
        Darwin into the domain of human sexual affairs, is not
        particularly new. But the scientists go further: If rape
        prevention programs are to be successful, they
        contend, evolution must be taken into account. They
        recommend, among other things, advising women that
        "the way they dress can put them at risk." They also
        recommend instructing young men, before they are
        granted drivers' licenses, that "Darwinian selection" is
        the reason a man "may be tempted to demand sex
        even if he knows that his date truly doesn't want it" or
        "may mistake a woman's friendly comment or tight
        blouse as an invitation to sex."

        Although the book is not scheduled for publication by
        the M.I.T. Press until April, manuscript galleys are
        circulating. And an excerpt by the authors, Dr. Randy
        Thornhill, Regent's professor at the University of New
        Mexico, and Dr. Craig T. Palmer, an anthropology
        instructor at the University of Colorado, appears in the
        current issue of the journal The Sciences. As a result,
        the book's thesis is already provoking discussion -- and
        anger.

                          Dr. Jerry Coyne, an evolutionary
                          biologist at the University of
                          Chicago who has read the
                          excerpt in the journal The
                          Sciences, called it "the worst
                          efflorescence of evolutionary
                          psychology that I've ever seen."

                          "It's irresponsible, it's
                          tendentious, it's an advocacy
                          article and the science is sloppy,"
                          he said. "There are some
                          aspects of human behavior that
                          are fairly clearly evolutionary. But
                          that's a long way from saying that
                          rape is adaptive in males."

        Dr. Mary P. Koss, an authority on rape and a professor
        of public health at the University of Arizona, says that
        evolution is a factor in rape.

        She cautioned, however, that "it is not proper to set up
        evolutionary and social causation as opposites,"
        adding, "You have to think about how they work
        together."

        Dr. Koss dismissed the notion that young men should
        be educated about the evolutionary origins of rape. Dr.
        Thornhill and Dr. Palmer, she said, "have obviously
        never stood up before a group and given a rape
        prevention talk."

        "If you even imply to a male audience that all men are
        potential rapists, they go berserk," she said.

        And she called the recommendation that women
        consider the risks of dressing attractively "absolutely,
        perfectly unacceptable."

        On the other hand, Dr. Donald Symons, a professor of
        anthropology at the University of California at Santa
        Barbara who studies human sexuality from an
        evolutionary perspective, said it was important for
        researchers to challenge the view that rape had little to
        do with sexuality. Though he quibbled with some points
        in the book, he said, "This is an argument for a
        particular view of male sexuality and it's a view that I
        think is correct."

        The intensity of the debate may have been inevitable,
        given that rape is a volatile political issue. But
        evolutionary psychology, once called "sociobiology," is
        itself a field that as a whole has been subject to
        criticism. Darwinian theory is based on the observation
        that evolution selects for success: animals with traits
        that promote survival or reproduction pass on their
        genes; others die out. Scientists have found an
        evolutionary view of animal behavior to be a powerful
        tool. But evolutionary psychologists are now seeking to
        apply similar principles to all aspects of human
        behavior. In some cases, scientists say, these efforts
        have proven fruitful.

        But critics have argued that in wading into the
        complexities of modern human sexual relationships,
        scientists are on much shakier ground, often ignoring
        the powerful influences of culture. And some critics
        assert that the work of some evolutionary psychologists
        is tinged with a misogynistic bias.

        Susan Brownmiller, whose influential 1975 treatise,
        "Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape," set the
        tone of the feminist argument and serves as a frequent
        punching bag for Dr. Thornhill and Dr. Palmer, said
        that the new book "gives sociobiology a bad name."

        "Feminists never said that rape had nothing to do with
        sex," Ms. Brownmiller said. "Obviously rape involves
        the sex organs, and I'm sure many men who do it think
        it's a supreme macho act of sex. But they're wrong."

        In an interview, Dr. Thornhill, an eminent evolutionary
        biologist who moved from work on insects to studies of
        human sexual behavior, said he and his co-author
        expected that their book would provoke debate. "The
        problem is basically a very limited understanding of
        how evolutionary biology applies to people," he said. "It
        takes people a long time to pull back from what is
        politically correct and do an analysis on it."

        The subject of rape and evolution has been so touchy,
        Dr. Thornhill and Dr. Palmer write in "A Natural History
        of Rape," that lectures on the topic have been
        picketed, scientific articles have been rejected by
        scholarly journals, and researchers who view rape
        through an evolutionary lens have been denied jobs at
        universities.

        At the core of the debate are assertions that are
        touchstones for evolutionary psychologists: that
        evolution favored promiscuity in men but choosiness in
        women and that the male of the species evolved to
        prefer young women because they are more likely to
        bear children.

        Sexual coercion, Dr. Thornhill and Dr. Palmer argue,
        may have evolved as an alternative reproductive
        strategy for males who, for whatever reason, were not
        lucky enough to persuade a female to copulate
        voluntarily. Or it may have developed as simply a
        byproduct of other adaptive traits, for example, a
        greater desire to engage multiple sex partners.

        Rape is inexcusable, they argue, but it must be viewed
        as a "natural biological phenomenon," as much a part
        of nature as other undesirable happenings like
        thunderstorms, epidemics and tornadoes. Dr. Thornhill
        and Dr. Palmer marshall an assortment of evidence.
        They note that young women at the peak of their
        childbearing years are greatly overrepresented among
        rape victims and that rape leads to murder in only
        one-hundredth of 1 percent of the cases, a figure
        confirmed by other rape researchers.

                              They also note that sexual
                              coercion of females by
                              males occurs in many other
                              animals, including the
                              scorpion fly, an insect Dr.
                              Thornhill has studied
        extensively. It is equipped with an appendage called a
        notal organ that appears specifically intended for rape.
        Sexual coercion has also been observed among fish,
        birds and nonhuman primates, notably the orangutan.

        Critics, however, some of whom have followed the
        researchers' writings on rape over the years and others
        who read the excerpt in The Sciences, said they do not
        find these arguments convincing.

        "The possibilities of bias in such work is enormous,"
        said Dr. Patricia Adair Gowaty, an evolutionary
        biologist at the University of Georgia. "And as
        sociobiologists we have become enamored of some
        ideas in the absence of credible and critical data."

        "These theories are intuitively attractive, and they fit
        many of the experiences we have," she said. "But it is
        when something is intuitive that you need to be most
        careful to have adequate scientific controls."

        Dr. Koss pointed out that although it is true that most
        rape victims are young women, most rapists are 18 to
        25, and it is more than likely that they will find victims in
        their own age group. She and other experts noted that
        a surprisingly large number of rape victims are young
        children.

        She said that other work by evolutionary scientists
        supported the notion that male violence toward women
        may have evolved partly as a strategy for controlling
        access to reproductive partners, an interpretation
        consistent with Ms. Brownmiller's observations. "But
        there are also roles for many other influences at the
        societal level, the institutional level, the family level, the
        peer level and within the two individual people," Dr.
        Koss said.

        And some critics objected to the authors' use of
        nonhuman examples to buttress their case. "We can't
        ask a female fish whether she appears to resist
        because she doesn't want to copulate or because she
        is testing males for their fitness," Dr. Coyne said. "But
        we can ask a human female who has been raped if she
        participated willingly."

        Equally contentious are the authors' ideas about how
        women react to rape. On the basis of a study in the
        1970's by Dr. Thornhill and his wife, Dr. Nancy W.
        Thornhill, they contend that young women suffer more
        distress after being raped than do children or older
        women past their reproductive years. This "makes
        evolutionary sense," they say, because it is young
        women who risk being impregnated by an undesirable
        mate.

        But Dr. Koss said that other studies indicated that the
        impact of rape was far worse for elderly women than
        for younger women. "They develop a much more
        pervasive fear of going out of their home," she said.

        Still, some scientists applaud the efforts of Dr. Thornhill
        and Dr. Palmer to refocus attention on rape as a sexual
        crime and to link it to other evolutionary work on male
        and female sexual behavior.

        Understood within the context of evolutionary theory,
        said Dr. Neil Malamuth, professor of psychology at the
        University of California at Los Angeles, the scientists'
        thesis "is not as preposterous as it might seem."

        While feminists like Ms. Brownmiller perform an
        important service by focusing on the violence and
        power components of rape, he said, "there are aspects
        of rape that really do have to do with sex."






       Home | Site Index | Site Search | Forums | Archives | Marketplace

       Quick News | Page One Plus | International | National/N.Y. |
Business |
         Technology | Science | Sports | Weather | Editorial | Op-Ed |
Arts |
        Automobiles | Books | Diversions | Job Market | Real Estate |
Travel

           Help/Feedback | Classifieds | Services | New York Today

             Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company







--
Ivan Handler
Senior Consultant
Project Management Partners, Inc
[log in to unmask]
Networking for Democracy
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager