LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for ISOGEOCHEM Archives


ISOGEOCHEM Archives

ISOGEOCHEM Archives


ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOGEOCHEM Home

ISOGEOCHEM Home

ISOGEOCHEM  February 2000

ISOGEOCHEM February 2000

Subject:

Re: S isotope of BaSO4

From:

"Kinga M Revesz, Chemist, Reston, VA (Kinga Revesz)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 12:54:54 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (186 lines)

Dear Stan,
I am very much aver of your paper,  but I thought it would be better to
start with a method which was originally developed for this system.
Regards:
Kinga

Kinga Revesz
Chemist, Stable Isotope Laboratory
U.S.Geological Survey
MS 431
Reston, VA 20192
T:703-648-5865
FAX: 703-648-5274



                    Stanislaw Halas
                    <[log in to unmask]        To:     [log in to unmask]
                    LUBLIN.PL>                cc:
                    Sent by: Stable           Subject:     Re: S isotope of BaSO4
                    Isotope
                    Geochemistry
                    <[log in to unmask]
                    VM.EDU>


                    02/04/00 12:10 PM
                    Please respond to
                    Stable Isotope
                    Geochemistry





Dear Kinga and S-34 Analysts !

I would like to turn your attention to a new paper:

S. Halas and J. Szaran (1999)  Low -- temperature  thermal
decomposition of sulfate to SO2 for  on -- line  34S/32S  analysis,
Anal. Chem. 77, 3254 -- 3257.

In this method we obtained total conversion of sulfate sulfur to
SO2 at temperatures 650 to 700 C in a few min. in presence of
NaPO3. This reagent and BaSO4 sample we put into Cu foil
which trapt excess of oxygen released from sufate.
So far we used this method with a glas line connected to
the inlet system. However it may be good for CFMS because
it is rather insensitive to temperature in the oven.

The only differences are in  T  and metal envelope (Cu instead Sn).

With best wishes,
Stan Halas

> Date:          Fri, 4 Feb 2000 09:59:07 -0600
> Reply-to:      Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]>
> From:          "Kinga M Revesz, Chemist, Reston, VA (Kinga Revesz)"
>                <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject:       S isotope of BaSO4
> To:            [log in to unmask]

> Hi All,
> Now, that S is in the "air" again, I decided to send a version of my
notes
> to the list members also, previously sent to other laboratories.   At
USGS,
> Reston Isotope Laboratory we have been running S isotope of BaSO4, C and
N
> of organic compounds,  N of soil samples etc. by hundreds now
successfully.
> Bruno Lavettre at Castech helped  me troubleshoot the system, thanks for
> that Bruno.  Frank Trench was very helpful with the MS, and Peter Stow's
> help at IsoMass was priceless with the Conflow interface.
>
> Short summary of running S isotope of BaSO4 on the Carlo Erba EA 2500 -MS
> Delta Plus system:
> I.  EA set up:     "Flash point"
> The fact that the melting point of the BaSO4 is 1580 C and the reactor
> temperature is only 1020 C could create difficulties in the analysis of S
> isotope of BaSO4.  The "flash point" has a higher temperature, around
1800
> C, (since the Tin oxidation reaction is exothermic); therefore it is
> critical to use it well by creating a sharp, sudden, bright and single
> flash.  This should be done by coordinating: 1.  He pressure and flow
rate,
> 2.  Oxygen pressure and flow rate, and 3. Sample start time. In fact, the
> system is so sensitive, that, for example, even a one-second difference
in
> the sample dropping time can make a difference in the look of the flash,
> peak shape and, consequently, the isotope result.  The optimum set-up in
> our system is: Cycle 100, Oxy 60 (O2 flow stops flowing into auto
sampler),
> Sample Start 10, and Sample stop: 40.  The Helium regulator is set for
150
> KPa, He flow Setup is 105 mL/min which measures 120 mL/minute at vent.
The
> Oxygen regulator is set for 150 KPa, and oxygen flow rate is 54 mL/minute
> at Purge. Oxygen loop is 5 mL.  Sample size is around 0.2 -0.3mg (BaSO4).
> We DO NOT use V2O5 because it is toxic, and it is a catalyst for SO3
> production and should be avoided.  It might help stabilize the so called
> oxygen effect by providing constant sours of oxygen in the combustion,
but
> I have never saw a study on that.  Even then, it might help the accuracy
> but not the precision of the result.
> II.  Leak in the system:
> Even a tiny leak could interfere with the result; it could create doubled
> peak shape, and unstable run etc. The high He flow rate makes the system
> more sensitive to leaks (Bernoulli principal).  Leaks could cause changes
> in the flow rate in an uncontrollable manner, which could interfere in
the
> quantitative combustion, in the peak shape, and consequently in the
isotope
> value.
> III.  Ashes in the reaction tube.
> Ash accumulation is also critical.  Although Tin oxide serves as a
catalyst
> in the reaction,  it also partially "clogs" the system interfering with
the
> flow rate, though not necessarily in a measurable manner.  This is,
> however, a "controlled interference" causing a shift in delta values.  By
> running frequent standard materials, this shift can be corrected.
> However, after around 50 samples (1 carousel) it is healthy to remove the
> ashes.
> IV.  Standard gas:
> We use SO2 ANHY by  Matheson,   small cylinder around 15 lb.  We do not
> have any problem with this gas.
> 11 psi gives us 1.3 V signal in Cup 1.  The length, ID and sometimes OD
of
> the capillary are critical, so does their location in the conflow.  (We
all
> know that.)
> V.   Mass Spectrometer:
> Should be focused very carefully (I am not going into details here).  It
is
> temperature sensitive, so it should be operating in a temperature
> controlled environment with all the side panels on.  We use resistor
1*10E9
> for Cup1, and 2*10E10 for Cup2.
> Internal precision check:
> Zero Enrich method (standard gas on/ off 10 times) should give 0.1 per
mill
> or better standard deviation, and the Ratio Linearity test should give
0.12
> per mill/Volt or better linearity.
> External precision check:
> Linearity test with same reference material should give standard
deviation
> 0.2 per mill at n=16, between sample weight 0.15 - 0.500 mg BaSO4.
> If this is not satisfied, one should try to run the same sample size
only.
> Precision should be for n=10 0.2 per mill.
> If neither of the criteria has been met, the system is useless and the MS
> should be refocused.
> VI.   Sample preparation.
> It is recommended to dry the sample overnight at 110 C, and weigh it as
> soon as it removed from the oven.   Before weighing, careful
homogenization
> should be done in an agate mortar and pestle.   We run 3 same standard
> materials first, than alternate 10 unknowns and 2 standards.    We use
> standards NBS 127 and IAEA SO6, delta S= 20.91 and -32.85 respectively,
and
> correct our data for slope and intercept.  If you have LIMS (Laboratory
> Information Management System) for light stable isotopes created by
> T.B.Coplen, it can do it for you.
> Reference:  A.Glesemann et al. Anal.Chem. 1994, 66 2816-2819.
>      T.B.Coplen, U.S.G.S. Open-File Report 98-284.
>
>
> Kinga Revesz
> Chemist, Stable Isotope Laboratory
> U.S.Geological Survey
> MS 431
> Reston, VA 20192
> T: 703-648-5865
> FAX: 703-648-5274
>

==============================
Professor Dr. Stanislaw Halas
Mass Spectrometry Laboratory
Maria Curie - Sklodowska University
20-031 Lublin, POLAND
tel: (48 81) 537 6275    fax: (48 81) 533 3669

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager