UVMFLOWNET Archives

April 2000

UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Beymer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 Apr 2000 14:48:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
I just recently found a copy of the show in my video cabinet, if anyone is
interested.

-----Original Message-----
From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Bob &
Shirley McLean
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 11:55 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Mobile screening


Hi All:

Does anyone remember the 20/20 special Frank West did a couple or three
years ago? I THINK it was 20/20...basically the final message was this:
for accurate testing, go to a credentialed technologist in a reputable
setting, and hopefully in an accredited Lab for the best results. If I
remember correctly, the person Frank followed through the testing had a
subclavian "steal" which was completely missed, among other things. Don
Ridgeway, do you still have the tape of that show? Point is: Frank knows
what he is talking about.

Shirley McLean, RVT
San Marcos, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: Diana Ross <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: Mobile screening


> Good for you, Frank! Glad to see that someone is checking these things
> out! It seems like they hit town like a storm and then run...
>
> And how can they be absolved from liability? I am absolutely sure that no
> signature like that would ever hold up in any court. If they provide a
> medical service, then they are liable for the accuracy of the results!!
>
> Diana
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2