LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for UVMFLOWNET Archives


UVMFLOWNET Archives

UVMFLOWNET Archives


UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UVMFLOWNET Home

UVMFLOWNET Home

UVMFLOWNET  April 2000

UVMFLOWNET April 2000

Subject:

CCI Vascular Exam

From:

Julia Hillier <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:43:07 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (181 lines)

I have reviewed with interest messages which have appeared on the
UVMFLOWNET regarding CCI and the Vascular Registry Examination offered
which awards the credential RVS (Registered Vascular Specialist).

I would first like to clarify information regarding the allied health
fields in medicine and the credentialing agencies role in what is
considered the professional "triad".

The professional triad exists to serve a specific allied health field. This
triad has three components:

1.  Educational Programs
2.  Professional Associations
3.  Credentialing Agency

For Example:
The allied health field known as Cardiovascular Technology is represented
by the Joint Review Committee in Cardiovscular Technology (JRC-CVT), a
committee of the Commission on the Accreditation of Allied Health
Educational Programs (CAAHEP). This committee establishes the educational
standards for programmatic accreditation through a document called
the "Educational Guidelines and Essientials" .There are many other
educational programs however, but, they are not programmatically accredited
and are most likely, institionally accredited (this may include programs in
university or community college systems, as well as, proprietary schools)
or State approved.

Cardiovascular Technology has several professional organizations which
serve members of the profession this includes the American Society of
Echocardiography (ASE), the Alliance of Cardiovascular Professionals (ACP),
the Society of Invasive Cardiovascular Profesionals (SICP) and the American
College of Chest Physicians ect.

The identified credentialing agency for Cardiovascular Technology is CCI.

The allied health field known as Diagnostic Medical Sonography is
represented by the Joint Review Committee in Diagnostic Medical Sonography
(JRC-DMS).

Diagnostic Medical Sonography is served by many professional organizations
such as the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers, The Society of
Vascular Technology ect.

The identified credentialing agency for Diagnostic Medical Sonography is
the American Registry of Diagnostic Medical Sonography (ARDMS).

This professional "triad" is also found in the Field of Radiology (JRC-ERT,
ARRT, ASRT) or in most professions found in the United States (legal,
accountants, physicians, nurses).

Having stated these differences I wish to address the question in relation
to CCI's Vascular Exam. In review of messages I have seen both testimonial
to CCI and it's exam, testimonial to the ARDMS and varied requests or
underlying comments related to current national politics or accreditation
pathways through the ICAEL or ICAVL. I would first address what CCI
currently administers in regards to the examination process. I will make
reference to the ARDMS, this is to allow individuals who currently have
this registry credential to be assured that there are no underlying
processes or politics involved between these two agencies except for those
generated from within the professional community. In addition, I will
address the ARRT crendentialing process to the best of my ability, and my
historical knowledge on the development of it's credentialing program.
Finally, I wish to make an attempt at demonstrating the value of any
credential to the care and safety of the patient, who appears to have been
left out of this controversy.

CCI is the credentialing agency for Cardiovascular Technology and as such
develops and administers examinations in Vascular Ultrasound,
Echocardiography and Cardiac Catheterization. Registry exams in these
specialities require the completion of a two-part exam process. The Board
of CCI however, realizes that many educational programs leading to the
completion of a specific degree or certificate in allied health fields may
teach similar core science courses. Therefore, an exemption may be granted
for the first part of the registry process if an applicant can demonstrate
a "current" active status for their original credential as issued by the
ARDMS, ARRT, NBRC or other agencies which have been identified as providing
a valid and acceptable credential for entry level practice.

In addition, CCI offers certification as a one part exam for EKG, Stress
Testing and Holter monitors.

The vascular regisry examination of CCI has been reviewed by the American
College of Cardiology (ACC) and has been endorsed as an exam of choice in
Invasive (Cardiac Catheterization-RCIS), Non-invasive (Echocardiography-
RCS) and Vascular Technology (RVS). In addition, the ARDMS vascular
registry was also reviewed and endorsed for the RVT and RDCS credential.

In regards to policies of Medicare Part B, the carrier medical directors
for each state have accepted both the credentials of CCI and the ARDMS for
reimbursement practices. This includes all regions that have adopted this
policy. CCI and the ARDMS are independent non-profit credentialing agencies
and serve different allied health fields. The choice of who professionals
credential through is their own. Policies, regulations and decisions of
these credentialing agencies are normally made to ensure the longevity,
reliability and validity of the examination offered within a given field of
practice. Upon successful completion of the credentialing exam, it is a
consideration that the individual has demonstrated the entry level
knowledge to perform. This is true of CCI, the ARDMS or ARRT credentialing.

In regards to the ARRT. In the late 80's the ARRT introduced the CIT
examination. This was following a classification of their registrants into
job skills (Specials, cardiac cath, ultrasound ect.) This exam was
developed as a specialty exam to cover procedures in cardiac
catheterization and special procedures. The introduction of an abdominal
and vascular ultrasound examination currently is considered by this agency
to be a continuing need of their registrants as they assume a broader range
of specialty areas in which they work in the field of radiology.

At the time the CIT exam was developed many individuals believed that it
would effect the cardiovascular technologist in cardiac catheterization and
that it would reduce the status of this credential or dilute it. However,
this did not occur. What did occur was the radiographer now had a choice as
to the credentialing pathway they could choose. The practice of special
procedures (a skill associated within radiology labs nationwide) was more
appropriately addressed by the ARRT and this created greater safety for the
patient. However, in cardiac catheterization labs (CCL)professionals who
were RT's and solely worked in that area began credentialing through CCI to
obtain their invasive registry.

The ARRT feels that adding to their examinations by specialty will better
serve their registrants. This is not something that CCI or the ARDMS would
support, however, it is an independent decision of this Board and the
responsibility of this Board to then seek approval of their exams and their
processes through the agencies or organizations who develop healthcare
policy, standards, or laws.

The Professional Society involved in other allied health fields can then
comment on these additions to policy by providing appropriate information
on scope of practice, qualifications employers may wish to look for, and
ultimately how the the best patient care will be provided. They may also
object to the inclusion. In addition, Societies provide continuing
educational opportunities for the profession, which meet the contact hours
determined by the credentialing body to ensure the current knowledge and
practice of professonals within the field. Professional membership within a
Society is an important decision and ensures that your occupation is
recognized and that your concerns are heard.

Accreditation through the ICAVL or ICAEL is not contingent upon all
individuals within your laboratory being credentialed at this time. This
however, could change as laws or policies change, this is a result of
professional growth, advancement of technology or additional regulation of
the field through state or federal law. The Board decisions to accept CCI
or ARDMS credentials is not to ensure the ARDMS does not obtain a monopoly.
The decision of this agency is based upon the acceptance of CCI as the
credentialing agency for Cardiovascular Technology and it's relationship to
the standards developed and the validation that the examinations offered
are a reliable assessment which ensures both safe and accurate imaging
procedures, ensuring patient safety and accurate diagnosis. CCI and the
ARDMS have been identified because these agencies have demonstarted the
ability to provide valid and reliable registry examinations of individuals
in the fields of Cardiovascular Technology and Diagnostic Medical
Ultrasound. This is a benefit to individuals credentialed by these agencies
and should be viewed professionally by individuals as an acknowledgement of
their credential and it's recognition within the national healthcare
community, regardless of the agency source for the credential.

Finally, I wish to state in reference to other comments that CCI has not
changed exam requirements or qualifications and at no time required
registrants to retest after successful exam completion. Exam requirements
or qualifications are changed when indicated by a Job/Task analysis survey.
In order for requirements to be changed this analysis would have to
demonstrate that practice within the fields requires a higher level of
education. This would very basically be determined by analysis of the
educational level of indviduals completing the survey and their report of
the frequency and importance of the duties they perform daily.

CCI does maintain a requiremnt for continuing education of 36 contact hours
every three years for registry credentials to be maintained. Registrants
may recertify through testing every three years to maintain these 36
credits.

I will be glad to address any questions related to CCI's examination
process or to assist any individual in obtaining accurate information
sources-I may be contacted by e-mail [log in to unmask] or by phone at 1-
800-326-0268.

Thank you

Julia Hillier
Executive Director, CCI

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager