Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LIST.UVM.EDU
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MEDLIB-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MEDLIB-L Archives

June 2000, Week 3

MEDLIB-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MEDLIB-L Home MEDLIB-L Home
MEDLIB-L June 2000, Week 3

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Medical Libraries Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
FW: Discusion: implications of full text whatever and the NY Ti mes etc.
From:
"Kleinmuntz, Dalia" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 14:37:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Kleinmuntz, Dalia" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (109 lines)
Jonquil Feldman's reply is below my thoughts,comments:

Let's look at the issue of online access, that,"is here to stay", and let's
say that Librarians ARE ready and willing to cooperate and to plan for both
the old and the new, etc. How is the librarian going to accomplish her
mission without the support of the parent organization?  After all,
Librarians are not indendent, free agent, and do not have the financial
means to follow up on "plans".  How long will it take the respective
Administrator to acknowlege the need for such change, and provide the
increased costs that such access  involves???? Or is it going to be just
"given" to users, bypassing the Library completely?  Even Academic libraries
are dependent on soemone's funding, but how much and when is it sufficient?
And what is the scenario for the continuation of Library services with old
fashioned- or limited - technology? And how does one get users to stop
grumbling and PAY for services, and now we are back to the issue of haves
and have-not, and the Library come up as the sole supporter of the have-not
crowd, but who is to support the LIBRARY?

Too much to think about, and no easy answeres, esp. before what looks like a
nice-weather weekend -

Dalia Kleinmuntz, AHIP               [log in to unmask]
Director, Webstr Library, Evasnton Hospital
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare
847-570-2664
847-570-2926 Fax

-----Original Message-----
From: Feldman, Jonquil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 1:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Reply to: interesting NY Times article - implications


I humbly disagree with the suggestion that the publishers are aiming to do
away with libraries. Yes, it is more profitable for publishers to offer
digitized publications and charge per use. They have financial control over
usage, whereas they lose that control when the library purchases a print
text for a one-time fee.

However, the article mentions the concern about access to electronic
information by low-income people. The primary role of libraries is to
provide access. I believe publishers continue to recognize this role and
they know they need us.

Fee-based digital libraries such as netLibrary are here to stay. Regardless
of the mission of the institution--public library vs. academic and/or
hospital library--subsidizing electronic access costs is an issue that must
be on planning agendas. The role of collection development librarians will
[or already does] include assessing electronic textbooks for a digital
"collection". They will be asking, Should they invest $100 in one printed
text book that gets 20-30 uses a year, or subscribe to the same textbook
online and subsidize the access to it? Should they charge for use of their
printers, whereas they now charge for use of their photocopiers? Will they
shift their budget from book processing to online subscriptions?

The larger concern should be, not the survival of libraries, rather their
relationship with publishers. This is not a new concern: we are constantly
discussing the rising costs of publications. However, in an age of
priceline.com where people can name the price they are willing to pay for
any commodity, we should be negotiating with the publishers from a stronger
position.

Other concerns are the longevity, or archiving, of the digital format, which
has been discussed on this list;  the selections for the digital library, as
mentioned in the article; and the assurance that the peer review process
will not be circumvented.

Jonquil D. Feldman, MLS
Assistant to the Library Director
Briscoe Library, U Texas Health Sci Ctr at San Antonio, MSC 7940
7703  Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX  78229-3900
(210) 567-2400   FAX: (210) 567-2490
mailto:[log in to unmask]       web: http://www.library.uthscsa.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Kleinmuntz, Dalia [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 10:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Reply to: interesting NY Times article - implications


We all know it is possible - but how much does it cost? ( and I am not
interested in the question, just the issue of doing away with the library
which is what publishers might be aiming for all along -?)

Dalia Kleinmuntz


-----Original Message-----
From: Silver, Janis I [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 8:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: interesting NY Times article


Today's NY Times has an interesting story on companies which digitize books
to create electronic libraries so researchers won't have to
go-to-the-library to do their research.
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/06/circuits/articles/15book.html
<http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/06/circuits/articles/15book.html>

Jan Silver, MA, AHIP
Health Sciences Library
Southern NH Medical Center
8 Prospect St/ PO Box 2014
Nashua  NH 03061-2014
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LIST.UVM.EDU CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV