LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  September 2000

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE September 2000

Subject:

Re: [Fwd: Please distribute widely]

From:

George Salzman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:01:20 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (444 lines)

Thank you, Michael.
George

Michael Goldhaber wrote:

> >Read below and gasp! AS I mentioned yesterday, all hell is going to break
> >loose when the American Anthropological Association meets in SF this
> >november around the issue below. Talk about Nazi medicine....
> >JIm
> >-----------------------
> >From: Donna J. Haraway <[log in to unmask] Sent: Thursday, September
> >14, 2000 4:13 PM Subject: Fwd: Imminent anthropological scandal
> >
> >Colleagues,
> >
> >I am forwarding this message in case you have not seen it.
> >
> >This is something we should all know about.  Very, very ugly.  It makes
> me pay
> >attention again to the hard and on-going problem of how to be
> responsible in
> >the many worlds of genetics--in biology, anthropology, medicine, journalism,
> >science studies, art, women's studies, popular culture, dog worlds--in short,
> >in all those places in which we all work.
> >
> >Donna
> >
> >========== To: Louise Lamphere, President, American Anthropological
> >Association
> >([log in to unmask])
> >
> >Don Brenneis, President -elect, American Anthropological Association
> >([log in to unmask])
> >
> >From: Terry Turner, Professor of Anthropology, Cornell University. Head
> of the
> >Special Commission of the American Anthropological Association to Investigate
> >the Situation of the Brazilian Yanomami, 1990-91 ([log in to unmask]
> >
> >Leslie Sponsel, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Hawaii, Manoa.
> >Chair of the AAA Committee for Human Rights 1992-1996 ([log in to unmask])
> >
> >In re: Scandal about to be caused by publication  of  book by Patrick Tierney
> >(Darkness in El Dorado. New York. Norton.  Publication date: October 1, 2000).
> >
> >Madam President, Mr. President-elect:
> >
> >We write to inform you of an impending scandal that will affect the American
> >Anthropological profession as a whole in the eyes of the public, and arouse
> >intense indignation and calls for action among members of the
> Association. In
> >its scale, ramifications, and sheer criminality and corruption it is
> >unparalleled in the history of Anthropology. The AAA will be called
> upon by
> >the
> >general media and its own membership to take collective stands on the
> >issues it
> >raises, as well as appropriate redressive actions. All of this will obviously
> >involve you as Presidents of the Association-so the sooner you know
> about the
> >story that is about to break, the better prepared you can be to deal
> with it.
> >Both of us have seen galley copies of a book by Patrick Tierney, an
> >investigative journalist, about the actions of anthropologists and associated
> >scientific researchers (notably geneticists and medical experimenters) among
> >the  Yanomami of Venezuela over the past thirty-five years.  Because of the
> >sensational nature of its revelations, the notoriety of the people it exposes,
> >and the prestige of the organs of the academic establishment it implicates,
> >the
> >book  is bound to be widely read both outside and inside the
> profession. As
> >both an indication and a vector of its public impact, we have learned
> that The
> >New Yorker magazine is planning to publish an extensive excerpt, timed to
> >coincide with the publication of the book (on or about October 1st).
> >
> >The focus of the scandal is the long-term project for study of the
> Yanomami of
> >Venezuela organized by James Neel, the human geneticist, in which Napoleon
> >Chagnon, Timothy Asch, and numerous other anthropologists took part. The
> >French
> >anthropologist Jacques Lizot, who also works with the Yanomami but is
> not part
> >of Neel-Chagnon project, also figures in a different scandalous capacity.
> >
> >One of Tierney's more startling revelations is that the whole Yanomami project
> >was an outgrowth and continuation of the Atomic Energy Comissions secret
> >program of experiments  on human subjects James Neel, the originator and
> >director of the project, was part of the medical and genetic research team
> >attached to the Atomic Energy Commission since the days of the Manhattan
> >Project. He was a member of the small group of researchers responsible for
> >studying the effects of radiation on human subjects. He personally
> headed the
> >team that investigated the effects of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs on
> >survivors,. He was put in charge of the study of the effects of atomic
> >bombs at
> >Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and later was involved in the studies of the
> >effects of
> >the radioactivity from the experimental A and H bomb blasts in the Marshall
> >Islands on the natives (our colleague May Jo Marshall has a lot to say about
> >these studies in the Marshalls and Neel's role in them). The same group also
> >secretly carried out experiments on human subjects in the USA. These included
> >injecting people with radioactive plutonium without their knowledge or
> >permission,in some cases leading to their death or disfigurement ( Neel
> >himself
> >appears not to have given any of these experimental injections). Another
> >member
> >of the same AEC group of human geneticists and medical experimenters, a
> >Venezuelan, Marcel Roche, was a close colleague of Neel's and spent
> some time
> >at his AEC-funded center for Human Genetics at Ann Arbor. He returned to
> >Venezuela after the war and did a study of the Yanomami that  involved
> >administering doses of a radioactive isotope of iodine and analyzing
> >samples of
> >blood for genetic data. Roche and his project were apparently the connection
> >that led Neel to choose the Yanomami for his big study of the genetics of
> >"leadership" and differential rates of reproduction among dominant and
> >sub-dominant males  in a genetically "isolated" human population. There is
> >thus
> >a genealogical connection between the  the human experiments carried
> out by
> >the
> >AEC, and Neel's and Chagnon's Yanomami project, which was from the outset
> >funded by the AEC.
> >
> >Tierney presents convincing evidence that Neel and Chagnon, on their
> trip to
> >the Yanomami in 1968, greatly exacerbated, and probably started, the epidemic
> >of measles that killed "hundreds, perhaps thousands" (Tierney's language-the
> >exact figure will never be known) of Yanomami. The epidemic appears to have
> >been caused, or at least worsened and more widely spread, by a campaign of
> >vaccination carried out by the research team, which used a virulent vaccine
> >(Edmonson B) that had been counter-indicated by medical experts for use on
> >isolated populations with no prior exposure to measles (exactly the Yanomami
> >situation). Even among populations with prior contact  and consequent partial
> >genetic immunity to measles, the vaccine was supposed to be used only with
> >supportive injections of gamma globulin.
> >
> >It was known to produce effects virtually indistinguishable from the
> >disease of
> >measles itself.  Medical experts, when informed that Neel and his group used
> >the vaccine in question on the Yanomami, typically refuse to believe it at
> >first, then say that it is incredible that they could have done it, and
> are at
> >a loss to explain why they would have chosen such an inappropriate and
> >dangerous vaccine. There is no record that Neel sought any medical advice
> >before applying the vaccine. He never informed the appropriate organs
> of the
> >Venezuelan government that his group was planning to carry out a vaccination
> >campaign, as he was legally required to do. Neither he nor any other
> member of
> >the expedition, including Chagnon and the other anthropologists, has ever
> >explained why that vaccine was used, despite the evidence that it actually
> >caused or at a minimum greatly exacerbated the fatal epidemic.
> >
> >Once the measles epidemic took off, closely following the vaccinations with
> >Edmonson B, the members of the research team refused to provide any medical
> >assistance to the sick and dying Yanomami, on explicit orders from
> Neel. He
> >insisted to his colleagues that they were only there to observe and
> record the
> >epidemic, and that they must stick strictly to their roles as
> scientists, not
> >provide medical help.
> >
> >All this is bad enough, but the probable truth that emerges, by implication,
> >from Tierney's documentation is  more chilling. There was, it turns
> out, a
> >compelling theoretical motive for Neel to want to observe an epidemic of
> >measles, or comparable "contact" disease, or at least an outbreak virtually
> >indistinguishable from the real thing-precisely the effect that the
> vaccine he
> >chose was known to cause-and to produce one for this purpose if necessary.
> >This
> >motive emerges from Teirney's documentation of Neel's extreme eugenic theories
> >and his documented statements about what he was hoping to find among the
> >Yanomami, interpreted against the background of his long association
> with the
> >Atomic Energy Commission's secret experiments on human subjects.  Neel
> >believed
> >that  "natural" human society (as it existed everywhere before the
> advent of
> >large-scale a gricultural societies and contemporary states with their vast
> >populations) consisted of small, genetically isolated groups, in which,
> >according to his eugenically slanted genetic theories, dominant genes
> >(specifically, a gene he believed existed for "leadership" or "innate
> >ability")
> >would have a selective advantage, because male  carriers of this gene could
> >gain access to a disproportionate share of the available females, thus
> >reproducing their own superior genes more frequently than less
> "innately able"
> >males. The result, supposedly, would be the continual upgrading of the human
> >genetic stock. Modern mass societies, by contrast, consist of vast genetically
> >entropic "herds" in which, he theorized, recessive genes could not be
> >eliminated by selective competition and superior leadership genes would be
> >swamped by mass genetic mediocrity. The political implication of this
> >fascistic
> >eugenics is clearly that society should be reorganized into small breeding
> >isolates in which genetically superior males could emerge into dominance,
> >eliminating or subordinating the male losers in the competition for leadership
> >and women, and amassing harems of brood females.
> >
> >A big problem for this program, however, was the tendency, generally
> >recognized
> >by virtually all qualified population geneticists and epidemiologists, for
> >small breeding isolates to lack  genetic resistance to diseases
> incubated in
> >other groups, and their consequent vulnerability to contact epidemics. For
> >Neel, this meant that the emergence of genetically superior males in small
> >breeding isolates would tend to be undercut and neutralized by epidemic
> >diseases to which they would be genetically vulnerable, while the supposedly
> >genetically entropic mass societies of modern democratic states, the
> >antitheses
> >of Neel's ideal alpha-male-dominated groups, would be better adapted for
> >developing genetic immunity to such "contact" diseases. It is known
> that Neel,
> >virtually alone among contemporary geneticists, rejected the genetic (and
> >historical) evidence for the vulnerability of genetically isolated
> groups to
> >diseases introduced through contact from other populations. It is possible
> >that
> >he thought that genetically superior members of such groups might prove to
> >have
> >differential levels of immunity and thus higher rates of survival to imported
> >diseases. In such a case, such exogenous epidemics, despite the enormous
> >losses
> >of general population they inflict, might actually be shown to increase the
> >relative proportion of genetically superior individuals to the total
> >population, and thus be consistent with Neel's eugenic program. However this
> >may have been, Tierney's well-documented account, in its entirety,  strongly
> >supports the conclusion that the epidemic was in all probabilty deliberately
> >caused as an  experiment designed to produce scientific support for  Neel's
> >eugenic theory.  This remains only an inference in the present state of our
> >knowledge: there is no "smoking gun" in the form of a written text or recorded
> >speech by Neel. It is nevertheless the only explanation that makes
> sense of a
> >number of otherwise inexplicable facts, including Neel's known
> interest in
> >observing an epidemic in a small isolated group for which detailed
> records of
> >genetic and genealogical relations were available, his otherwise inexplicable
> >selection of a virulent vaccine known to produce effects virtually identical
> >with the disease itself, his behavior once the epidemic had started (insisting
> >on allowing it to run its course unhindered by medical assistance while
> >meticulously documenting its progress and the genealogical relations of those
> >who perished and those who survived) and his own obdurate silence,
> until his
> >death in February, as to why he carried out the  vaccination program in the
> >first place, and above all with the lethally dangerous vaccine.
> >
> >The same conclusion is reinforced by considering the objectives of the
> >anthropological research carried out by Chagnon under Neel's initial direction
> >and continued support. Chagnon's work has been consistently directed toward
> >portraying Yanomami society as exactly the kind of originary human society
> >envisioned by Neel, with dominant males (the most frequent killers)
> having the
> >most wives or sexual partners and offspring. If this pristine, eugenically
> >optimal society could be shown to survive a contact epidemic with its
> >structure
> >of dominant male polygynists essentially intact, regardless of quantitatively
> >serious population losses, Neel might plausibly be able to argue that his
> >eugenic social vision was vindicated. If the epidemic was indeed produced
> >as an
> >experiment, either wholly or in part, the genetic studies on the
> >correlation of
> >blood group samples and  genealogies carried out by Chagnon and some of his
> >students thus formed integral parts of this massive, and massively fatal,
> >human
> >experiment.
> >
> >As another reader of Tierney's ms commented,  Mr. Tierney's analysis is
> a case
> >study of the dangers in science of the uncontrolled ego, of lack of respect
> >for
> >life, and of greed and self-indulgence. It is a further extraordinary
> >revelation of malicious and perverted work conducted under the aegis of the
> >Atomic Energy Commission.
> >
> >Tierney's revelations begin, but do not end, with the 1968 epidemic.
> There are
> >many more episodes and sub-plots, almost equally awful, to his
> narrative of
> >the
> >antics of anthropologists among the Yanomami. Enough has been said by this
> >time, however, for you to see that  the Association is going to have to make
> >some collective response to this book, both to the facts it documents
> and the
> >probable conclusions it implies.There will be a storm in the media, and
> >another
> >in the  general scholarly community, and no doubt several within anthropology
> >itself. We must be ready. Tierney devotes much of the book  to a
> critique of
> >Napoleon Chagnon's work (and actions). He makes clear Chagnon has faithfully
> >striven, in his ethnographic and theoretical accounts of the Yanomami, to
> >represent them as conforming to Neel's ideas about the Hobbesian
> savagery of
> >"natural" human societies , and how this constitutes the natural selective
> >context for the rise to social dominance and reproductive advantage of males
> >with the gene for  "leadership" or "innate ability" (thus Chagnon's
> >emphasis on
> >Yanomami "fierceness" and propensity for chronic warfare, and the supposed
> >statistical tendency for men who kill more enemies to have more female
> >sexual/reproductive partners). He documents how all these aspects of Chagnon's
> >account of the Yanomami are based on false, non-existent or misinterpreted
> >data. In other words, Chagnon's main claims about Yanomami society, the ones
> >that have been so much heralded by sociobiologists and other partisans
> of his
> >work, namely that  men who kill more reproduce more and have more female
> >partners, and that such men become the dominant leaders of their communities,
> >are simply not true. Thirdly and most troublingly, he reports that
> Chagnon has
> >not stopped with cooking and re-cooking his data on conflict but has actually
> >attempted to manufacture the phenomenon itself, actually fomenting conflicts
> >between Yanomami communities, not once but repeatedly.
> >
> >In his film work with Asch, for example, Chagnon induced Yanomami to enact
> >fights and aggressive behavior for Asch's camera, sometimes building whole
> >artificial villages as "sets" for the purpose, which were presented as
> >spontaneous slices of Yanomami life unaffected by the presence of the
> >anthropologists. Some of these unavowedly artificial scenarios, however,
> >actually turned into real conflicts, partly as  a result of Chagnon's
> >policy of
> >giving vast amounts of presents to the villages that agreed to put on the
> >docu-drama, which distorted their relations with their neighbors in
> ways that
> >encouraged outbreaks of raiding. In sum, most of the Yanomami conflicts that
> >Chagnon documents, that are the basis of his interpretation of Yanomami
> >society
> >as a neo-Hobbesian system of endemic warfare, were caused directly or
> >indirectly by himself: a fact he invariably neglects to report. This is not
> >just a matter of bad ethnography or unreflexive theorizing: Yanomami were
> >maimed and killed in these conflicts, and whole communities were
> disrupted to
> >the point of  fission and flight.(Brian Ferguson has also documented
> some of
> >this story, but Tierney adds much new evidence). As a general point, it is
> >clear that Chagnon's whole Yanomami oeuvre is more radically continuous with
> >Neel's eugenic theories, and his unethical approach to experimentation on
> >human
> >subjects, than appears simply from a reading of Chagnon's works by themselves.
> >
> >Chagnon is not the only anthropologist mentioned in Tierney's
> narrative. Some
> >of his students, like Hames and Good, are also dealt with (not so
> >unfavorably).
> >The F French  anthropologist, Jaques Lizot, also gets a chapter. He has had
> >nothing to do with Neel or Chagnon (in fact has been a trenchant and cogent
> >critic of their work), but he has an Achilles heel of his own in the
> form of a
> >harem of Yanomami boys that he keeps, and showers with presents in exchange
> >for
> >sexual favors (he has also been known to resort to young girls when
> boys were
> >unavailable). On the sexual front, there are also passing references to
> >Chagnon
> >himself demanding that villagers bring him girls for sex.
> >
> >There is still more, in the form of  collusion by Neel and Chagnon with
> >sinister Venezuelan politicians attempting to gain control of Yanomami lands
> >for illegal  gold mining concessions, with the anthropologists providing
> >"cover" for the illegal mine developer as a "naturalist" collaborating with
> >the
> >anthropological researchers, in exchange for the politician's guaranteeing
> >continuing  access to the Indians for the anthropologists.
> >
> >This nightmarish story  -a real anthropological heart of darkness beyond
> >the     imagining of even  a Josef Conrad (though not, perhaps, a Josef
> >Mengele)--will be seen (rightly in our view) by the public, as well as most
> >anthropologists, as putting the whole discipline on trial. As another
> >reader of
> >the galleys put it, This book should shake anthropology to its very
> >foundations. It should cause the field to  understand how the corrupt and
> >depraved protagonists could have spread          their poison for so long
> >while
> >they were accorded great respect throughout the Western World and generations
> >of undergraduates received their lies as the introductory substance of
> >anthropology. This should never be allowed to happen again.
> >
> >We venture to predict that this reaction is fairly representative of the
> >response that will follow the publication of Tierney's book and the New Yorker
> >excerpt. Coming as they will less than two months before the San Francisco
> >meetings, these publication events virtually guarantee that the Yanomami
> >scandal will be at its height at the Meetings. This should give an optimal
> >opportunity for the Association to mobilize the membership and the
> >institutional structure to deal with it. The  writers, both emeritus
> >members of
> >the Committee for Human Rights, have arranged with Barbara Johnston, the
> >present chair of the CfHR, that the open Forum put on by the Committee this
> >year be devoted to the Yanomami case. This seemed the best way to
> provide a
> >venue for a public airing of the scandal, given that the program is of  course
> >already closed. With Johnston's consent, we have invited Patrick
> Tierney to
> >come to the Meetings and be present at the Forum. He has accepted. He
> has also
> >agreed to have a copy of the book ms sent to Johnston, for the use of the
> >CfHR.
> >We have also tentatively agreed with Barbara that the CfHR should draft a
> >press
> >release, which the President (either or both of you) could (if you and the
> >Executive Board approve) circulate to the media. There are obviously human
> >rights aspects of this case that make the CfHR appropriate, but the Ethics
> >Committee, the Society for Latin  American Anthropology, and the Association
> >for Latina and Latino Anthropology should also be notified and involved,
> >separately or jointly. These obviously do not exhaust the
> possibilities--- a
> >lot of thought and planning remains to be done. Our point is simply
> that the
> >time to start is now.
> >
> >------- End of Forwarded Message ______________________________ Donna J.
> >Haraway History of Consciousness Dept. University of California at
> Santa Cruz
> >Santa Cruz, CA  95064 fax: 831-459-3733
> >
> >
> >Attachment Converted: "c:\program files\eudora\attach\nielsft.vcf
> >




--
=======================================================
[log in to unmask]
http://omega.cc.umb.edu/~salzman

Current home address (dirección actual)
Quetzalcóatl N° 220    int 2
Centro C.P.68000
Oaxaca, Oax. Mexico
    tel (from U.S. 011-52) (9)514-8242

Home address in U.S. (dirección cuando esté en Estados Unidos)
12-14 Laurel Street
Cambridge, MA 02139
    tel (from Mexico 95)617/547/5033

Physics Department
Univ of Massachusetts
Boston, MA 02125
    tel 617-287-6067
    fax 617-287-6053 (at dept)

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager