LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for MES Archives


MES Archives

MES Archives


MES@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MES Home

MES Home

MES  October 2000

MES October 2000

Subject:

Initiative

From:

Wavell Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Moretown Educational <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:21:13 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (71 lines)

As per our recent board meeting discussion, I propose the following
letter as the best means to ensure an opportunity to initiate face to
face discussions with our fellow WWSU board members.  Your thoughts on
this matter plus any suggested changes, additions, deletions, etc. are
important.   ..... Wavell

Dear School Board colleague:
     Our school board asks that you welcome 3 of our members to an early
future meeting of your board in order to discuss two issues which we
feel are festering because of a lack of any effective forum for frank
and respectful interchange.  These issues are summarized, from our
perspective, as follows:
     The authority vested in school board members is clearly defined by
law in Vermont Statutes Annotated (V.S.A.) Title 16.  This authority is
specifically limited in certain areas. School board members in a union
high school district, for instance, do not have the authority to change
the method by which the high school budget is assessed to participating
towns unless confirmed by a positive vote of the citizens from each of
the participating towns (V.S.A. 16  706n).
     When the Harwood school board violated this statute in allocating
the 1998 Harwood budget, the Moretown School Board, we believe, quite
properly protested.  This protest was upheld by the Commissioner of
Education after consultation with the legal staffs of the Department of
Education and of the Office of the Attorney General.   By this time two
additional annual budgets had been illegally allocated by the Harwood
board. Upon receiving this ruling, the Harwood board reverted to the
proper allocation procedure for the 2001 Harwood budget, but adopted the
stance that there was no need to rectify the improper allocations of the
previous three years.  A further recent ruling by the Commissioner of
Education simply recommended that this issue be resolved by correcting
the misallocation for only the most recent of the past three years. The
Harwood board have indicated a willingness to proceed in this manner,
and this may perhaps be a desirable solution. However, we maintain the
position that in accordance with the commissioner's earlier ruling, the
Harwood board lacks the authority to make such a decision without a
consenting vote of the citizens of each of the participating towns.  We
believe it is up to the voters of the towns of the WWSU to decide this
issue, not the Harwood board or any other school boards, including the
Moretown board, or for that matter, any select boards.

    A  comparable issue has to do with the allocation of the costs for
transportation by the board of the Washington West Supervisory Union
(WWSU). V.S.A.16  301 provides that all supervisory union expenses will
be allocated in proportion to student enrollment unless agreed otherwise
by participating districts.When the WWSU took over student busing from
the Harwood Union High School in the early 90s it was decided to
continue the practice of allocating costs based on a factor relating to
total mileage rather than student enrollment.  While this was
permissable when Harwood was contracting out the service, it is not
permissable for the WWSU to do so in the absence of a consenting vote of
all districts.  It is not clear that such a vote was ever taken.  It is
certain that such a vote was not applied in respect to the recently
negotiated new transportation contract accepted by the supervisory
union.  We believe it is a dangerous precedent to select any specific
supervisory union service and not ensure that the per student cost for
this service is the same in all participating towns.  If one service is
not so treated, why not others, which if carried to the extreme would
destroy the whole concept and meaning of a supervisory union.  For these
reasons the Moretown board questions both the desirability and legality
of the current proposed allocation of the WWSU transportation costs.

    We look forward to the opportunity for perhaps 3/4 hr. of dialogue
in what we hope will begin a more frequent and productive interaction
between our two boards.


      Regards
      Kent Holden
      Secretary,
      Moretown School Board

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
October 2006
July 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
August 2005
April 2005
March 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager