LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  November 2000

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE November 2000

Subject:

Mistakes Cleaning Voter Databases Might Have Influenced Election

From:

Rich Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:46:05 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (228 lines)

http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,402957,00.html

This article has some new research into mistakes, or possibly intentional,
bad computer programming that ended up removing not just felons
from the Florida voter list, but also legitimate registered voters
whose name (and ethnic identity) were similar to those of prisoners.

Was this sloppiness intentional or was it just a mistake?  The new
info published Sunday was that the firm that did the computer
processing was a major contributor to the Bush campaign.  It would
be good for those of you with some academic resources to look
into this.

-rich cowan





From:  [log in to unmask]
Date:  Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:04:44 EST

Dear American Media:

Could you please check out the following story. It ran in Sunday's Observer
in the United Kingdom.  The last portion of the story details how Katherine
Harris, the Florida Secretary of State, hired Database Technologies to
examine the Florida voter rolls.  This examination resulted in 12,000 mostly
African-Americans being disqualified as voters for allegedly having criminal
records.  This information was in error in the vast majority of cases and
resulted in more than enough people being disqualified to tip the election
into this recount and contest faze.

The parent company for Database Technologies allegedly made a six figure soft
money contribution to the Republicans.  If these facts are even in part true
they need to be public and Katherine Harris needs to be investigated for
prejudice in her official duties.

Please review the pertinent parts of the article and let me know what you
think.  The American people have a right to know if the Florida Secretary of
State was using a company with ties to the Republican party to disqualify
voters who should not have been purged from the rolls.

The author's email address appears at the end of the article.  A hyperlink
and web address directly to the Observer precede the article.

Check it out.  The American people want the truth.


Sincerely,

Ed Rudd
409 Redbud Drive
Gadsden, Alabama
-------------------------------------------------------------------

The Guardian
<A
HREF="http://ads.guardianunlimited.co.uk/html.ng/Params.richmedia=yes&location
=bottom&spacedesc=03&site=Observer&navsection=1364&section=102271&rand=05463
33">Observer | Business | Best democracy money can buy</A>
http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,402957,00.html
28.11.2000


    Best democracy money can buy

Gregory Palast examines the sources of the $500m that boosted Bush's bid for
the White House

Sunday, November 26, 2000

Last week, I mailed my overseas ballot for the US presidency -- and you can
wipe that smug little grin off your face. I won't put up with condescending
comments about America's democratic rituals from a nation with an unelected
House of Lords occupied by genetic fossils and, soon, Chris Woodhead.
In fact, you could think of the $3 billion spent in the US campaign in
positive, New Labour terms. Call it 'the efficient privatization of the
democracy' -- though an outright auction for the presidency would be more
efficient still.

If the guy who lost the vote, George W. Bush, nevertheless wins the White
House, he'll have surfed in on a crushing wave of nearly half a billion
dollars ($447 million), my calculation of the suffocating plurality of cash
from corporate America, a good 25 per cent more than Al Gore's take.

George W could not have amassed this pile if his surname were Jones or Smith.
The key to Dubya's money empire is Daddy Bush's post-White House work which,
incidentally, raised the family's net worth by several hundred per cent.

Take two packets of payments to the Republican Party, totalling $148,000,
from an outfit called Barrick Goldstrike. That's quite a patriotic
contribution from a Canadian company. They can afford it. In 1992, in the
final hours of the Bush presidency, Barrick took control of US
government-owned property containing an estimated $10bn in gold. For the
whole shooting match, Barrick paid the US Treasury only $10,000.

Barrick made deft use of an 1872 gold rush law meant to allow pan-and-bucket
prospectors to gain title to their tiny claims. In 1992, Clinton's newly
elected administration was ready to prevent Barrick's stunning grab. But
Barrick is a lucky outfit. Bush's Interior Department expedited procedures to
ram through Barrick's claim stake before Clinton's inauguration.

Ex-Pres George Bush was lucky, too. When the electorate booted him from the
White House, he landed softly -- on the Barrick Goldstrike payroll, where he
comfortably nested until last year.

Who is Barrick? Its founder, Peter Munk, made his name in Canada in the 1950s
as the figure in an infamous insider stock-trading scandal. Munk headed a
small speaker manufacturer that went belly-up, just after he sold his stock.
This is not quite the expected pedigree for an international minerals mogul.

If we look in the shadows behind Munk we can see the more accomplished player
who provided the capital to set up Barrick - Saudi arms dealer Adnan
Khashoggi.

During Bush's presidency, Khashoggi was identified as conduit in the
Iran-Contra conspiracy. He had already run into trouble with US lawmen when,
in 1986, he was arrested and charged -- but not convicted -- of fraud. He was
bailed out of the New York prison by Munk, who provided the $4m bond. Bush
performed an even bigger favour for Khashoggi: as his last act in office, the
president pardoned Khashoggi's alleged co-conspirators, key members of Bush's
own cabinet. As a result, no case could be made against Khashoggi.

In 1996, a geologist prospecting in Indonesia, Mike Guzman, announced his
discovery of the world's richest gold field. Munk rapidly deployed his
president. Bush, on behalf of Barrick, contacted officials of the former
dictator Suharto who were in control of mining concessions. Thereafter, De
Guzman's company was told it would have to turn over 68 per cent of its claim
to Barrick.

Barrick didn't have long to gloat. Jim-Bob Moffett, the tough, old, Louisiana
swamp dog who heads Freeport-McMoRan Mining, had a private meeting with his
old benefactor Suharto. At the end of the meeting, Jim-Bob and the dictator
stood on the steps of the presidential palace to announce that
Freeport-McMoRan would replace Barrick. (Ironically, Barrick lucked it again.
The gold find was a hoax. After Jim-Bob learnt he'd been suckered, his
company invited geologist De Guzman to talk it over. Sadly, on way to the
meeting, De Guzman fell out of a helicopter.)

While Mr Munk's president did not pay the cost of his rental in Indonesia,
Bush could redeem himself in Africa. In 1996, as genocide in Rwanda fomented
civil war in Zaire, Barrick smelt opportunity. We have learnt that, at that
time, Bush spoke with his old golfing buddy, Mobutu Sese Seko (then dictator
of Zaire) about diamond concessions.

I don't know what ex-CIA director Bush told the panicked dictator, but we do
know that Mobutu granted Barrick exclusive rights to mine diamonds in
north-west Zaire.

Maybe Bush talked about Barrick's mining experience in neighbouring Tanzania
where, according to Amnesty International, Barrick's subsidiary carried out
'extra-judicial killings'. Amnesty reports that 50 independent miners who
refused to move off the Barrick unit's concession were buried alive in the
pits by company bulldozers. Barrick denies the allegations.

Beyond Barrick, Daddy Bush has many other friends who filled up his
sonny-boy's campaign kitty while Bush performed certain lucrative favours for
them. In 1998, Bush père created a storm in Argentina when he lobbied his
close political ally President Carlos Menem to grant a gambling licence to
Mirage Casino corporation.

Bush wrote that he had no personal interest in the deal. That's true. But
Bush fils did not do badly. After the casino flap, Mirage dropped $449,000
into the Republican Party war chest.

The ex-president and famed Desert Strormtrooper-in-Chief, also wrote to the
oil minister of Kuwait on behalf of Chevron Oil Corporation. Bush says
honestly that he, 'had no stake in the Chevron operation'.

Following this selfless use of his influence, the oil company put $657,000
into Republican Party coffers. Most of that loot, reports the Center for
Responsive Politics, came in the form of 'soft money' That's the squishy
stuff corporations use to ooze around US law which, you may be surprised to
learn, prohibits any donations to presidential campaigns in the general
election.

Not all of the elder Bush's work is voluntary. His single talk to the board
of Global Crossing, the telecoms start-up, earned him $13m in stock. The
company also kicked in another million for his kid's run.

And while the Bush family steadfastly believes that ex-felons should not have
the right to vote for president, they have no objection to ex-cons putting
presidents on their payroll. In 1996, despite pleas of US church leaders,
Daddy Bush gave several speeches (he charges $100,000 per talk) sponsored by
organisations run by Rev Sun Myung Moon, cult leader, tax cheat - and
formerly, the guest of the US federal prison system.

There are so many more tales of the Bush family daisy chain of favours,
friendship and campaign funding. None of it is illegal - which I find
troubling. But I don't want to seem ungrateful. After all, the Bushes helped
make America the best democracy money can buy.

Blackout in Florida

Vice-President Al Gore would have strolled to victory in Florida if the state
hadn't kicked 12,000 citizens off the voters' registers five month ago as
former felons.

In fact, only a fraction were ex-cons. Most were simply guilty of being
African-American. While 8,000 of those disenfranchised went through the legal
rigmarole of getting on to the voting list, the rest - enough to have won the
state for Gore - did not.

A top-placed election official (not a Democrat) told me that the government
had conducted a quiet review and found - surprise! - that the listing
included far more African-Americans than would statistically have been
expected, even accounting for the grievous gap between the conviction rates
of blacks and whites in the US.

The source of this poisonous blacklist: Database Technologies, a division of
ChoicePoint, and hired by Governor Jeb Bush's frothingly partisan Secretary
of State, Katherine Harris. My thanks to investigator Solomon Hughes for
informing me that DBT is a division of ChoicePoint. Under fire for mis-use of
personal data in state computers, ChoicePoint founder Rick Rozar made a
strategic six-figure soft cash donation to the Republican Party.

• Email: [log in to unmask]







Organizers' Collaborative      PO Box 400897, Cambridge MA  02140
[log in to unmask]                         www.organizenow.net

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager