LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  November 2000

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE November 2000

Subject:

SF Gate: Nobel Winner's Theories Raise Uproar in Berkeley/Geneticist's views strike many as racist, sexist

From:

Leon Wofsy <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:03:00 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (138 lines)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was sent to you by someone who found it on SF Gate.
The original article can be found on SFGate.com here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/11/13/MN111208.DTL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
November 13, 2000 (SF Chronicle)
Nobel Winner's Theories Raise Uproar in Berkeley/Geneticist's views strike many as racist, sexist
Tom Abate, Chronicle Staff Writer


   Nobel laureate James Watson, whose co-discovery of DNA revolutionized the
field of genetics, has provoked a scientific controversy by suggesting
there are biochemical links between skin color and sexual activity and
between thinness and ambition.
   Watson advanced his thesis during a guest lecture at the University of
California at Berkeley last month, prompting several faculty members to
brand his remarks as racist, sexist and unsupported by any scientific
data.
   Witnesses were flabbergasted when the 72-year-old discoverer of the double
helix suggested there was a biochemical link between exposure to sunlight
and sexual urges. "That's why you have Latin lovers," Watson said. "You've
never heard of an English lover. Only an English patient."
   In a lecture hall jammed with more than 200 Berkeley students and faculty
members, Watson showed a slide of sad-faced model Kate Moss to support his
contention that thin people are unhappy and therefore more ambitious.
   "Whenever you interview fat people, you feel bad, because you know you're
not going to hire them," Watson said.
   Even those who chalked up Watson's remarks to his penchant for
deliberately stirring things up were concerned that hearing such views
expressed by a Nobel laureate would fuel irresponsible speculation about
how genes might influence behavior.
   "Doesn't a guy like Jim Watson have the responsibility to make this not
ugly?" asked UC Berkeley biologist Michael Botchan, a Watson protege.
"Yes. But I cannot tell Jim Watson to change his ways."
   Watson, who shared a Nobel Prize for his role in figuring out the
structure of DNA in 1953, and who launched the Human Genome Project in
1990, declined to answer questions about his lecture.
   However, a spokesman at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research
institute on Long Island where Watson serves as president, confirmed the
gist of his remarks and said Watson has voiced similar sentiments at other
scientific gatherings.
   Berkeley biology professor Susan Marqusee walked out about a third of the
way through Watson's hourlong lecture, titled "The Pursuit of Happiness:
Lessons from pom-C." CLAIMS UNSUPPORTED BY DATA
   "I was kind of in shock most of the time," Marqusee said. "He took a lot
of what I consider sexist and racist stereotypes and claimed a biochemical
basis without presenting any data."
   Botchan, who presided over the session, said Watson was merely trying to
call attention to a protein (pom-C) that helps create several different
hormones: One determines skin color (melanin); another enhances a sense of
well-being (beta endorphins); and the third plays a role in fat metabolism
(leptin).
   Botchan said Watson was wondering out loud why evolution had linked these
hormones, and whether the interrelationship of these mood and
behavior-influencing compounds might be affected by exposure to sunlight.
   Unfortunately, said Botchan, Watson advanced his hypothesis with "comments
that were crude and sexist and potentially racist." But Botchan, who did
post-graduate work under Watson, said he doesn't think the Nobel laureate
is racist or sexist, merely insensitive.
   "Jim says startling things," he said. "He is a person who tends to shock
people."
   For instance, Botchan said, Watson once suggested Japan should be bombed
for dragging its feet on supporting the Human Genome Project.
   Berkeley genetics professor Thomas Cline said Watson's lecture "crossed
over the line" from being provocative to being irresponsible because the
senior scientist failed to separate fact from conjecture.
   "If he wants to give a talk like this in his living room, that's his
business, but to give it in a setting where it's supposed to be scientific
is wrong," Cline said, adding that listening to Watson at the podium was
"more embarrassing than having a creation scientist up there." GRADUATE
STUDENTS UPSET
   The controversial talk was profoundly disturbing to some graduate students
in Berkeley's molecular biology department, who ultimately brought
Watson's comments into the public spotlight.
   "I found it really offensive," said Sarah Tegen, one of several graduate
students who recounted Watson's remarks.
   She said Watson happened to be in Berkeley when the department needed a
speaker for a regular scientific seminar. The lecture hall, which seats
around 200 people, filled to overflowing as word spread that Watson, one
of the founders of modern biology, would speak.
   Watson, who has a reputation as an engaging lecturer, started off
describing an experiment by scientists at the University of Arizona, who
injected male patients with an extract of melanin. They intended to test
whether they could chemically darken the men's skin as a skin cancer
protection, only to observe an unusual side effect -- the men developed
sustained and unprovoked erections.
   "He said this (melanin injection) is even better than Viagra because you
don't even have to think about sex," Tegen recalled.
   "Then he launched into this whole thing about the sun and sexual drive,"
added Berkeley graduate student Jill Fuss. She said Watson showed slides
of women in bikinis and contrasted them to veiled Muslim women, to suggest
that controlling exposure to sun may suppress sexual desire and vice
versa.
   Watson reportedly went on to suggest that people who live in northern
climates drink more alcohol to compensate for the unhappiness they suffer
because of sunlight deprivation. Then he delved into what he presented as
the bad news, good news aspects of being fat, the students said. The bad
news, said Watson, is that thin people are more ambitious and therefore
make better workers. On the other hand, fat people may be more sexual,
Watson told the assembly, because their bloodstreams contain higher levels
of leptin, one of the hormones derived from pom-C. He used a slide of a
Reubens painting to illustrate the assertion.
   Tegen was offended by Watson's repeated references to women. "To be a
woman in science is difficult enough as it is without one of your own
demeaning women," she said.
   Jeffrey Friedman, a molecular geneticist at Rockefeller University and a
leading authority on leptin and obesity, had this reaction when presented
with a distilled version of Watson's remarks: "People can speculate about
anything they want," he said. "But I know of no data linking differences
in weight to any particular set of personality differences." OTHER
LAUREATES TARNISHED
   If Watson's theories are judged as being beyond the scientific pale, he
would not be the first Nobel laureate to fall from grace after winning the
highest honor in science.
   Now-deceased Stanford University professor William Shockley, who shared a
Nobel for inventing the transistor, was ostracized during his lifetime for
calling certain races genetically inferior, and for suggesting that people
with IQs under 100 be paid bonuses if they agreed to be sterilized.
   Former biotech scientist Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel for inventing a
process to multiply DNA samples, was marginalized after he lent his name
to several dubious causes, including the discredited notion that HIV is
not the cause of AIDS.
   No matter how history judges Watson's emerging views on pom-C, his fame
guarantees a broad audience for his views, however politically unsettling
or scientifically unsound they may be.
   Berkeley biology professor Caroline Kane, who did not attend Watson's
talk, said she was disappointed that "a figure who looms so large in the
science of the late 20th century" would take such a provocative stance in
the absence of the precise data that is the hallmark of good science.
   "Sometimes, Nobel laureates are asked to give their opinions on areas
where they should keep their mouths shut," Kane said. "Unfortunately, Jim
just likes to talk."

   E-mail Tom Abate at [log in to unmask], Chronicle staff writer Todd
Wallack contributed to this report.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2000 SF Chronicle

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager