Coni:

Back in 1990 when I was first learning  carotids (on the Diasonics 400) it
took me almost 90 minutes  per exam . My mentor ( Her  name was Ruth Meyer
RDMS/RVT at Nanticoke MH in Seaford DE.), could do the same uncomplicated
exam in <20 minutes. Carotids were scheduled in 60 minute time slots. She
once told me that she probably could have them scheduled in 30 minute slots,
and still do a quality job.

 I rolled my eyes in awe and disbelieve.

She commented that it was a one -machine department , however. If management
wanted two machines, they would have to purchase another unit...she had no
intention of becoming one!   Over the years, (albeit with Color Flow, and
much better equipment!) I also achieved the <20 min carotid. When I train
sonographers to do carotids, I tell them the same thing that Ruth told me :
" If they want a machine, they will have to go out and purchase one,  they
didn't purchase me."

Rich Dempsey RDMS/RVT


----- Original Message -----
From: "Coni Lucas" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: Tech Volumes


> I've worked in a variety of labs with as many differing factors.  One
> director insisted I spend at least an hour on a carotid exam or the
patient
> was being cheated.  Where I am now the "medical director" freaks out if we
> spend more than 5-6 minutes on a normal carotid.  I do what I feel is best
> for my abilities and the patient's care.  A lot depends on equipment,
> transport, paperwork, etc etc.  You get the picture.  I don't think its
fair
> to accuse another tech of doing substandard studies because they do more
> patients than another tech feels is the "appropriate number".  We all have
> varying degrees of abilities.  Lighten up!
> Coni Lucas RVT