IT-DISCUSS Archives

April 2002

IT-DISCUSS@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Departmental Technology Coordinators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:33:53 -0400
Reply-To:
Departmental Technology Coordinators <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
"Jessica L. Dion" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<003f01c1ef8d$7cb5a1f0$e96cc684@lachesis>
Organization:
University of Vermont
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (21 lines)
Thanks Geoff for your update on FTP software.  I have one question:

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Geoffrey Duke wrote:

...

> We have been distributing SSH.com's Secure Shell, which combines a
> remote terminal (like telnet) client with a file transfer client. CIT
> Client services staff have concerns that this product may not continue
> to provide what we need.

Can you add a little more detail to this?  Do you think SSH.com's Secure
Shell is going to be less desirable in the future than it is now, or do
you think that our current needs would not be met by distributing only
this program?  I just want to be clearer on what this program lacks that
we think we need.

Thanks -

                                                - Jessica Dion

ATOM RSS1 RSS2