LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  May 2002

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE May 2002

Subject:

Tribute to Stephen Jay Gould

From:

Louis Proyect <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 23 May 2002 13:34:32 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (142 lines)

http://www.marxist.com/scienceandtech/stephen_jay_gould.html

A tribute to a great scientist
Stephen Jay Gould
Who died on May 20, 2002
Sadly, on Monday, May 20, Stephen Jay Gould the famous American
palaeontologist died of cancer. He was 60 and died at his home in New York.

Gould made a major contribution to development of modern science with his
theories on evolution. Prior to his studies scientists had accepted
Darwin's view of a very slow and gradual process of evolution. Together
with Eldredge in the early 1970s, beginning with a study of land snail
shells, he discovered that there was another pattern to the evolutionary
process. They saw that what the fossil records showed was not one
continuous gradual process, but a series of sudden bursts of change
followed by relatively long periods of very slow development. Gould and
Eldredge coined the term "punctuated equilibria" to describe this process.

Gould and Eldredge then had to face quite widespread opposition from the
scientific community. By patiently explaining their ideas they managed to
convince many, but some to this day still reject their theory.

Alan Woods and Ted Grant wrote their book, Reason in Revolt, Marxist
Philosophy and Modern Science in 1995. The book was published 100 years
after the death of Frederick Engels and the purpose was to update Engels'
Dialectics of Nature. The last 100 years of scientific study have provided
ample proof that the method of Engels and Marx, i.e. that of dialectical
materialism, actually reflects the real processes of nature.

Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge demonstrated quite conclusively that
these processes are sometimes slow and protracted and at other times
extremely rapid. They show how a gradual accumulation of small changes at a
certain point provokes a qualitative change.

In this they finally resolved the problem Darwin had in understanding what
was known as the "Cambrian explosion". Prior to the Cambrian explosion very
few fossil records have been found. Then "suddenly" life forms seem to
develop very rapidly. In fact fossil records do not fit in to a gradualist
interpretation of evolution. There are periods where life forms change
rapidly, and then there are other long periods where nothing seems to
change. Darwin believed that it was just a question of time before new
discoveries in the fossil records would show the gradual change that had
taken place. But these records have never materialised. Gould and Eldredge
understood what had actually happened.

This discovery was yet another confirmation of one of the fundamental laws
of dialectics, the transformation of quantity into quality. Individual,
almost imperceptible, small changes pile up one upon another. At a certain
point the quantity provokes a sudden leap, a qualitative change. This has
been confirmed over and over again in the natural world. It can also be
applied to the development of society itself. Small changes over long
periods of time suddenly lead to abrupt leaps.

However, the scientific-academic world is dominated by bourgeois ideology,
that is, the way of thinking of the capitalist class. The capitalists
cannot accept the idea that the natural world and society change through
sudden leaps, i.e. revolutions. They want us to believe that everything is
gradual. Thus they are imposing upon the real objective processes of
nature, and of society, their own subjective viewpoint which is determined
by their privileged position. Unfortunately for them the most advanced
scientific research repeatedly contradicts this viewpoint. That explains
why Gould and Eldredge faced such vehement opposition to the conclusions
they drew from their studies.

Gould himself was actually aware of Marxist philosophical thought. In his
book Ever Since Darwin, he refers to Engels' essay The Part Played by
labour in the Transition from Ape to Man and he says the following:

"Indeed, the nineteenth century produced a brilliant exposé from a source
that will no doubt surprise most readers - Frederick Engels. (A bit of
reflection should diminish surprise. Engels had a keen interest in the
natural sciences and sought to base his general philosophy of dialectical
materialism upon a 'positive' foundation. He did not live to complete his
'dialectics of nature', but he included long commentaries on science in
such treatises as the Anti-Dühring.) In 1876, Engels wrote an essay
entitled, The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from Ape to Man. It
was published posthumously in 1896 and, unfortunately, had no visible
impact upon Western science.

"Engels considers three essential features of human evolution: speech, a
large brain, and upright posture. He argues that the first step must have
been a descent from the trees with subsequent evolution to upright posture
by our ground-dwelling ancestors. 'These apes when moving on level ground
began to drop the habit of using their hands and to adopt a more and more
erect gait. This was the decisive step in the transition from ape to man.'
Upright posture freed the hand for using tools (labour, in Engels'
terminology); increased intelligence and speech came later."

Gould understood the limitations of Western thought when he wrote that a
"deeply rooted bias of Western thought predisposes us to look for
continuity and gradual change."

Although the Soviet Union was a terribly deformed caricature of what
genuine socialism should be, among Soviet scientists there was a greater
understanding of dialectics. And in The Panda's Thumb he points out that:
"In the Soviet Union, for example, scientists are trained with a very
different philosophy of change - the so-called dialectical laws,
reformulated by Engels from Hegel's philosophy. The dialectical laws are
explicitly punctuational. They speak, for example, of the 'transformation
of quantity into quality.' This may sound like mumbo jumbo, but it suggests
that change occurs in large leaps following a slow accumulation of stresses
that a system resists until it reaches the breaking point. Heat water and
it eventually boils. Oppress the workers more and more and bring on the
revolution. Eldredge and I were fascinated to learn that many Russian
palaeontologists support a model similar to our punctuated equilibria."

Gould was not prepared to go all the way and accept that dialectics can be
applied not only to science, and palaeontology in particular, but to
society itself. Like many scientists he used the dialectical method in his
own sphere of studies without grasping the overall outlook of Marxism.
However, through his studies he made a major contribution to the
development of human thought and of our understanding of the world we live
in. Above all he provided more scientific evidence that strengthens the
position of Marxism, for it proves that dialectical materialism is not a
fantastic notion thought up by Marx himself, but it is simply the
reflection of the real material world as it is.

Through his works Gould became one of the most well-known American
scientists. He wrote volumes and openly expressed his views in opposition
to many gradualist evolutionary theorists. He also popularised his ideas
and made them easily accessible to millions of readers. He wrote a long
series of essays in Natural History magazine. He won the National Book
Critics Award in 1982 and came 24th in the Modern Library's list of the one
hundred non-fictional English language works of the 20th century. His works
were always permeated with a progressive outlook. He totally rejected
reactionary scientific theories. For example he refuted all attempts to use
pseudo-scientific theories to justify racism and discrimination.

His presence will be greatly missed by all thinking people. We recommend
that all our readers take the time to read at least his main works. This is
the best tribute we can make to one of the great scientists of the 20th
century.

Fred Weston,

London,
May 22, 2002


Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager