LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  November 2002

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE November 2002

Subject:

Re: Lula won!

From:

Maurice Bazin <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:26:25 -0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (170 lines)

Dear friends,
Claudia and Sam Zaslavsky wrote to me the following as Lula won the
presidency of the Federal Republic of Brazil:
>Congratulations on your new president. We wish him and his party success
>in carrying out his program and overcoming the forces of reaction. I just
>read that in a program initiated by the Workers Party, poor people receive
>monetary rewards when they send their children to school, and enrollment
>has increased greatly!   Best wishes >

Many of you wrote in a similar vein.

I thank you all and we indeed need all your wishes, and your continuying
vital opposition to the US Government's agressivity, military, economic and
cultural.
Yes, it is a potential new era. It smells of Chile in 1970. However some
differences with Chile indicate a more difficult "transition": the
political culture of Chile involved individuals who used politics to rule
and decree to the advantage of the ruling segments of the country (pretty
obvious, of course) and did it all openly, clearly, in other words pretty
honestly as catholic bourgeois, called Christian Democrats in the Frei
government that preceded Allende's.
In partial contrast, the avowed political culture here is today a grown-up
culture of falsehood and mere taking personal advantage of one's position
for the benefit of a few cohort members. Within this system of privileges
and advantages, objecting to "corruption" is considered naivety. It is
simply part of daily official political life and scandals end up in
congressional ethics committees... But, the day before a committee will
propose the expulsion of a congresman or a senator, that individual resigns
not to lose his right to  active political life and ...  he indeed gets
reelected at the next election. This happened with two major crooks just a
few months before this last election, and they were both reelected!  We
cannot think of them as "reaction"; they are a major part of the ongoing
action. It is also true that others of the same ilk did not make it in
again.  This last "sweep away of the dinausors" is a good sign but the
reelection of the two others is part of a reality that is entrenched at all
levels of political relationships. We know, using the words of the
brazilian educator Paulo Freire, that "the present is influenced by the
past and the future is built up from the present".    So, the principled
behavior of the Workers' Party when governing municipalities, more and more
of them, during the past decade still represents an exception, if a hopeful
and inspiring one. It did contribute to the growth in votes for the party
and Lula as its emblematic figure.
However, we must look with some care at this simple conclusion by taking
the case of the state of Rio Grande do Sul and the municipality of Porto
Alegre, its capital. Everyone knows of Porto Alegre today because of the
Social Forum of this year; indeed the Workers' Party has governed the city
for the past 10 years, with two more to go to the next municipal election.
It also grew in strength and succeeded in taking the government of the
State four years ago... and lost it in this last election.  "Explaining"
this last phenomenon is a task for those who believe in the democracy of
propaganda machines, media, multinational influence and
personality-centered brazilian regionalist politics.
The serious problem is the easiness with which this loss is taken as an
example of the beauty of formal liberalism, or the fairness of electoral
democracy, and certainly not as representing any dialectical opposition of
interests. All sectors of the political spectrum play softly:  At one end,
Lula himself, in his first pronouncement, talked of "benefitting the whole
of the population. We shall create a National Pact within Brazil." That
notion of National Pact has historical resonances of quieting down those
who push for immediate correction of the country's "social debts" that Lula
mentions generically. Somehow, the Landless Peasant Movement, all quiet
during the electoral campaign not to embarras Lula, most active in Rio
Grande do Sul and very present in all international progressive Forums, is
not mentioned in Lula's four-page pronouncement.    At the other end of
Brazil's real societal structure we find the editorialists of conventional
provincial newspapers that typically always comfort the local ruling elite
while remaining in harmony with the owners of their medium (usually the
dominant "Globo" media network). Safely, they quote Peter Flynn, a
"brazilianist" from the University of Glasgow, as "happy with the marketing
style of the free electoral slots" on the dominant TV channel, "a show of
massive expression of citizenship through the vote". They want it to remain
just a show. And they are proud of the approval of the foreign "schollar"
(sic) who does not look at the social forces involved.

The local political structure in the State of Santa Catarina, next to Rio
Grande do Sul, is another example of probable ongoing difficulties: the
present governor is the husband of the present mayor of the capital city,
Florianopolis: the Amin's. She will stay on for another two years and he
was just defeated by a liberal politician who says that he is an ally of
Lula. So the votes cleared out another feudal controller indeed. However,
it is fundamental to remember how this local lord fought his latest (lost
by less than 1%) battle.  When the opinion measurers announced a close race
he threw his supporters into the streets, T-shirts in hand with his number
on it, giving out 10 or 20 Reais (the value of four or eight hamburgers at
MacDonald) to each person who would wear the T-shirt. He printed leaflets
that were distributed by acquiescent school directors (his wife nominates
them), and raised outdoors on the front of the house of everyone who had
been benefited by his politico-administrative machine. There were cars with
flags with his number all over, rental dump-trucks parked at major
intersections with flags and number tatooes all over...  There was costly
"visibility" indeed.  What makes the difference between this all-out
propaganda style and the U.S. style is what happened the morning after Lula
and the opposition governor won: no-one was to be seen anymore wearing one
of these T-shirts and all the outdoors had magically disappeared.  My
lesson is that although Lula declared that his victory showed that "hope
won over fear", that same fear remained among the "defeated"; their way of
looking at political victory/defeat has not changed overnight. People
expect to loose the favors they were used to, so they hide their
allegiance, however superficial it might have been.
My take is that the allegiance to "Lula la!" is culturaly superficial too.
In the days of Chile and Allende, the "option" was clear-cut: it was called
"the road to socialism".  Here I have not heard the word pronounced once
today. Of course it used to be pronounced when the Workers' Party (PT) was
founded and the first "intellectual" to sign up as a party member said that
he wanted "socialism, without any adjective attached". This was 20 years
ago...


Today "the left in Brazil" as you, my American friends, use the term, is
headed by Lula's collaborators who all have lived within real brazilian
politics ("real" like in "real socialism") for many years. The Chinese
always reminded William Hinton that "things are not so simple" and this is
the case here too.   When Lula announces that his first action will be to
face hunger among the people by creating a Commission on Social
Emergencies, I feel that this is not showing (and less attacking) deep
causes.....   This is not the way Fidel et al. went about solving the
problem.  Lula's promise to "combat hunger" reminds me of the "war on
poverty". The problem is of course "how" you combat the causes of hunger
and poverty. Instead of causes Lula talks of a consequence: the need, the
duty (with a tinge of guilt from the progressive catholic allies)  to
remedy the "social debt" accumulated during centuries.
Everyone saw the price of bread rise 25% during the week preceding the
election. The owners of bakeries put up hand-written apologies to their
customers, explaining that they had to follow the "absurd increase in the
price of flour". I found myself waiting in vain for a Fidel-type didactic
speech explaining the real reasons for this state of affairs. Ordinary
people simply saw the price of bread rise while the bakers could at least
talk about the price of flour. But who would talk, teach, explain that 80%
of Brazil's flour is imported, paid in dollars whose "value" rose 50% (in
steps each 25th of the month over the last six months due to the banks'
manipulations when the internal debt (calculated in dollars!) becomes due.
If the people knew all this they might demand some concreteness about
Lula's "capacity to guarantee the restart of growth, of economic
development with creation of jobs and distribution of income" and as he
promises "already in 2003, to put exportations on the offensive" especially
in the agricultural domain. Some more precise words could have been used
considering that the major export is soy, that has displaced wheat in many
fields in recent years... Or is "a selective program of competitive
substitution of imports" going to solve all this? "selectively" and with
"competition"?
  So the internal problems are linked to international economic relations
indeed. But here again the party's program and Lula's pronouncement accept
and replay standard concepts and values of the liberal credo, "to
constitute a broad mass consumer market that will give security to the
investments of companies, attract productive international investments and
represent a new model of development and compatibilize income distribution
and economic growth".   What is new there is the honesty of the wish.
As I write, the price of gasoline just went up 20% and the middle class
starts blaming Lula. A newspaper editorial starts asking: How long can road
transporters keep narrowing their margins of profit?
Am I dreaming about Chile?

Maurice
P.S.  I would like if one of you would take this to the Monthly Review
office, on your way to the Brecht Forum.  They may publish it if they wish.
Thanks.





Maurice Bazin
Rua Pau de Canela 1101
Campeche/Florianópolis
88063-505    BRASIL
Fone: 55  48  237 3140
Fax: 55  48  338 2686 (Talvez você precise avisar.  May need oral warning)

e-mail:   [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager