LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCHOOL-IT Archives


SCHOOL-IT Archives

SCHOOL-IT Archives


SCHOOL-IT@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCHOOL-IT Home

SCHOOL-IT Home

SCHOOL-IT  December 2002

SCHOOL-IT December 2002

Subject:

Technology Planning/Assessment update

From:

Bill Romond <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

School Information Technology Discussion <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 31 Dec 2002 08:51:31 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (93 lines)

Hi all -

Following a recent meeting in Washington, we are able to provide some
clarifications regarding technology requirements under the No Child Left
Behind Act (NCLBA). Vermont was represented by Bill Romond (Educational
Techology Coordinator from the Department of Education) and Phil Hyjek
(Director of Technology at Vermont Institutes).

We will continue to apply the NCLBA requirements in ways that make sense for
Vermont students and educators. However, the new federal law does "raise the
bar" in terms of having us examine our uses of educational technology so
that it benefits student learning.

Please pass this information along to your local administrators, media
specialists, curriculum coordinators, and technology specialists... and
PLEASE feel free to forward your thoughts and comments to me as to how you
think we should proceed in Vermont.


Bill Romond

Educational Technology Coordinator
Vermont Department of Education
120 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05620-2501
(802) 828-0064 (V)
(802) 828-3140 (F)
http://www.state.vt.us/educ
[log in to unmask]
*********************************************************

ITEM: Technology Literacy requirement: There IS a requirement in NCLB that
all Eighth Grade students achieve "technology literacy". There is no
deadline for when this goal must be achieved (there WAS a deadline in an
earlier version of the law) NOR is there a definition of what "technology
literacy" means. There has been speculation that the US DOE would create and
require states to administer a national technology assessment. THIS IS NOT
THE CASE. We have been told that there will NOT be a national technology
assessment.

WHAT THIS MEANS: Vermont's schools and the State Department of Education
will be required to demonstrate that we are addressing the Technology
Literacy requirement and making progress toward the goal. It will be up us
to determine how we will do this in Vermont. It is likely that we will
identify a number of strategies to support documentation of our progress in
reaching this goal. Among those strategies will be on-going surveys, the use
of valid observational data, and student performance. It is not at all clear
yet which methods will be voluntary or which methods, if any, will be
requirements. We expect further direction from the US DOE as the National
Technology Plan is developed both through a national "definition" of
technology literacy and through compilation of resources to support
surveying, observation, and student performance. Over the next couple of
months we will be working with the Vermont Institutes to provide you with
those resources. In the meantime, you can get a sampling of some of those
resources at:
http://www.vismt.org/programs/infotech/planning/oresources/assessmt_resource
s.html

In addition, our New England Regional support center (NEIRTEC) has a growing
set of resources focused on the specific NCLB requirements. Refer to their
"Tech Briefs" at: http://www.neirtec.org/products/techbriefs/default.asp

----------------------------------------------------

ITEM: National (and State) Technology Plan: The National Technology Plan
process is anticipated to begin in January, 2003.... somewhat behind
schedule. We continue to believe that we in Vermont should move slowly on
our State Technology Plan (and thus local plans) until we have more guidance
under the Federal Plan.

WHAT THIS MEANS: The National Plan will drive the State Plan, which will in
turn influence local planning. A review of Vermont's original State
Technology Plan (1996) was completed by Frank Watson and others some time
ago (2001). We have since aligned that review with the 15 specific NCLBA
requirements for the Vermont State Plan. NOTE that one of those requirements
is to have technology fully integrated into every school's curriculum by the
end of 2006. We will be creating a draft outline for a state plan and will
then convene a small planning team to reflect on that draft outline in the
spring of 2003. Following this session, we plan to have a larger statewide
meeting on the State Plan prior to the end of this school year. Since this
work will be ongoing, WE WILL EXTEND APPROVAL OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGY PLAN
UPDATES TO DECEMBER 31, 2003 (More than 90% of Vermont's schools now have
approved NCLB-compliant Plan updates.

We recommend that you focus your technology planning efforts on developing
and supporting Professional Development experiences in technology
integration that are consistent with the (research-based) National Staff
Development Council standards (http://www.nsdc.org), begin preliminary
discussions about other data gathering techniques such as surveying,
observation, and student performance (see above). In addition, the US DOE's
Office of Educational Technology (http://www.ed.gov/Technology/) will have a
growing set of resources to support our efforts.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager