LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  March 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE March 2003

Subject:

US arms dealer to be new dictator of Iraq

From:

Ian Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:26:12 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (220 lines)

Man who would be 'king' of Iraq

Oliver Morgan on Jay Garner, the hawkish head of the Pentagon agency that will
be handling lucrative reconstruction deals

Sunday March 30, 2003
The Observer

President, viceroy, governor, sheriff. It is difficult to know what to call Jay
Garner, the retired US general who will run Iraq if and when Saddam Hussein
is deposed.

The 'call me Jay' 64-year-old would prefer 'co-ordinator of civilian
administration'. That's the bland description of his job heading the Office for
Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance, the Pentagon agency preparing to
govern Iraq's 23 million people in the aftermath of war, provide humanitarian
support and administer the lucrative business of reconstruction.

Garners credentials are intriguing. He has a fine record in United
Nations-backed humanitarian operations, playing a senior role in protecting the
Kurds of northern Iraq from Saddam after the 1991 Gulf war in Operation Provide
Comfort. Crucially he is now out of khaki, a vital counterpoint to General
Tommy Franks, who is likely to act as a US military governor. On the other
hand, he is closely linked with the group of hawks centred on US Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (who gave him his latest job), his deputy Paul
Wolfowitz and Vice President Dick Cheney, who are as keen to bypass the UN in
the aftermath of war as they were before it.

He appears to share their strong pro-Israeli views. He has been involved in
formulating their more controversial defence policies, including the US
national missile defence system that has done much to undermine the 1972
anti-ballistic missile treaty. The company he now works for is a missile
specialist and makes money from systems deployed in Israel and by coalition
forces in Iraq.

With this background, the aid agencies are equivocal about his role. Phil
Bloomer of Oxfam says: 'Iraqis should run Iraq and in the transition the UN
should be in charge, not the US. A worst-case scenario would be to put in
charge of Iraqi reconstruction someone from the US or UK who was linked to the
arms or oil industries.'

Garner's view of the effectiveness of the US military in a humanitarian role
was made clear during Provide Comfort. The army, he said, was the merciful
instrument in shaping future humanitarian operations. But Provide Comfort was
carried out under very different circumstances. The war it followed was
mandated by UN Security Council resolutions, as was the humanitarian mission.

Today, relations between Garner and the UN appear strained, as was clear at a
frosty meeting earlier this month, when he explained his role before departing
for Kuwait. 'There was no co-ordination or consultation,' said one UN official.
'That would be inappropriate from the UN's point of view because its operations
are autonomous; we do not need to consult with the US. But also from the US
position, because it is common knowledge that they want to go it alone without
the UN.'

Despite movement towards a UN role in reconstruction through a new resolution
extending the Oil For Food programme, officials have deep suspicions about US
intentions, particularly those of Garner's friends. 'Powell [pro-UN Secretary
of State] has already lost the battle,' said one. 'It is clear that Rumsfeld,
Cheney and the rest have the ascendancy and they think, having gone it alone in
the war, they should get the benefit of being seen as liberators. Garner is
their man. He is a true believer.'

Beyond the strong Pentagon links of an ex-military man, Garner's political
constituency is with the Republican right. His contacts with the Vice President
go back to Provide Comfort, when Cheney was defence secretary to the first
Bush, while his relationship with Rumsfeld has been sealed through recent close
co-operation on missile defence policy.

These links have provoked unease among companies outside the US, which believe
that the Americans want to carve up reconstruction contracts among themselves,
regardless of any UN role. A subsidiary of Cheney's old company, Halliburton,
has recently secured a deal to put out oil well fires. Halliburton, and
Bechtel, another company with strong Republican links, were on a US-only
shortlist for a major $900m reconstruction contract that will be overseen by
Garner's office.

After strong lobbying from UK companies, the DTI agency Trade Partners UK
managed to get a British secondee into Garners office, and Trade Secretary
Patricia Hewitt lobbied the US government to include the British.

But contractors say ORHA is not responding to requests for contact. 'We have
worries about this,' said one. 'There is a huge row going on behind the scenes
about Halliburton and Bechtel winning deals, and we can't talk to the people on
the ground.'

But there are wider concerns, particularly Garner's work with Rumsfeld, his
commercial activities, and views on Israel. Rumsfeld headed the Commission to
Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, which reported to the
US Congress in 1998. The Rumsfeld Commission singled out three countries
threatening the US with ballistic missile development - North Korea, Iran and
Iraq - thus defining the axis of evil that underpins the US's pre-emptive
strategy.

Garner served on Rumsfeld II, which effectively extended missile defence into
space. He was involved in the deployment of Patriot missiles in Israel during
the 1991 Gulf War, and was commander of the US Army Space and Strategic Defense
Command from 1994 to 1996.

When Patriot's effectiveness was questioned at a 1992 congressional hearing,
Garner dismissed critics, saying 40 per cent of engagements in Israel and 70
per cent in Saudi Arabia were successful.

However, Ted Postol of the Massachussetts Institute of Technology, who gave
evidence at the hearing, said: 'We believe that these figures are too high, and
that it may be the case that zero engagements in Israel were effective. Garner
may have been involved in covering up the deficiencies of the system.'

Garner is now commercially involved in the latest version of Patriot, currently
deployed in Iraq. He is president of SY Coleman, a missile systems contractor
that gives technical advice and support on the running of the programme. Israel
is now protected by a new system called Arrow. SY Coleman is involved here too:
Garner helped oversee development work, a programme that Postol estimates was
80 per cent funded by the US.

Jack Tyler, SY's senior vice-president for business development, confirmed it
had worked both on Patriot and Arrow. However, he said, there was no
procurement, sale or royalty to the company from the systems, only advisory
fees.

Tyler dismissed suggestions that Garner was hired because of his defence
contacts, saying his role was that of a strategic planner. SY has strong
relationships with the then US government. In 1999 it won a Star Wars contract
worth up to $365m to provide the US forces with advice on space and missile
defence. The SY website lists a series of government logistics and R&D
contracts.Meanwhile, SY was bought by another company, L-3 Communications, last
year. L-3 is the ninth-largest contributor to US political parties in the
defence electronics sector. Last week it was awarded a $1.5bn contract to
provide logistics services to US special operations forces.

Garner's links with Israel are not limited to missile programmes. In October
2000 he put his name to a statement that said that 'Israel had exercised
remarkable restraint in the face of lethal violence orchestrated by the
leadership of a Palestinian Authority'.

The organisation behind the statement was the Jewish Institute for National
Security Affairs, which includes Cheney and Richard Perle, another arch-hawk,
among its advisers past and present.

Only last week Perle resigned from the chairmanship of a key Pentagon committee
advising Rumsfeld, after it emerged that he had struck a deal with bankrupt
telecoms company Global Crossing under which he stood to receive up to
$725,000. The deal is being reviewed by a government group that includes
Defense Department officials.

There is no suggestion that Garner might feel similarly compromised by past
association and some find the anti-Garner arguments overstated.

Eric Schwartz of Washington's respected Council on Foreign Relations think-tank
says: 'I am not sure this is a US go-it-alone guy. He understands the critical
importance of it not being the military doing the nation-building.' Schwartz
believes that, after an interim period, the UN will take control of critical
issues in Iraq's future, such as drawing up a constitution and overseeing
elections.

It will be for Washington to decide whether the Sheriff of Baghdad wears a US
or a UN star. His record suggests he would be equally happy in either. Its how
he uses the badge that counts.

http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,925325,00.html

_________

US arms trader to run Iraq

Exclusive: Ex-general who will lead reconstruction heads firm behind Patriot
missiles

Oliver Morgan, industrial editor
Sunday March 30, 2003
The Observer

Jay Garner, the retired US general who will oversee humanitarian relief and
reconstruction in postwar Iraq, is president of an arms company that provides

     ADVERTISEMENT

crucial technical support to missile systems vital to the US invasion of the
country.
Garner's business background is causing serious concerns at the United Nations
and among aid agencies, who are already opposed to US administration of Iraq if
it comes outside UN authority, and who say appointment of an American linked to
the arms trade is the 'worst case scenario' for running the country after the
war.

Garner is president of Virginia-based SY Coleman, a subsidiary of defence
electronics group L-3 Communications, which provides technical services and
advice on the Patriot missile system being used in Iraq. Patriot was made
famous in the 1991 Gulf war when it was used to protect Israeli and Saudi
targets from attack by Saddam Hussein's Scud missiles. Garner was involved in
the system's deployment in Israel.

SY Coleman has also worked on the Arrow missile defence system, deployed in
Israel, and is involved in the US national missile defence programme. Garner
joined SY Technologies, taken over last year by L-3, in 1997, after leaving the
US army.

Defence analyst David Armstrong of the Washington-based National Security News
Service says: 'It seems inappropriate for somebody to step into a humanitarian
and administrative role from a company with a role in providing equipment
which, albeit defensive, is vital to the success of the US operation.'

Phil Bloomer of Oxfam said 'The worst case scenario would be to put in charge
of the reconstruction someone from the US or UK linked to the arms or oil
industries.'

According to its website, SY Coleman provides technical services such as
missile system engineering and target system design for a wide range of US
military programmes, and also makes some components. It also provides
operational services such as battle management and 'warfighter support'.

The Ministry of Defence has confirmed that it was a Patriot missile that was
involved when a British Tornado was hit last week.

Jack Tyler, an SY Coleman senior vice-president, confirmed that Garner still
held his position at the company.


http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,925309,00.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager