LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  March 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE March 2003

Subject:

"Socialist" Bernie Sanders

From:

"Aaron S. Hawley" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:37:17 -0500

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (116 lines)

March 31, 2003
Hedging His Bets
Bernie Sanders Votes Maybe on the War
http://counterpunch.org/jacobs03312003.html
By Ron Jacobs

The US House of Representatives recently voted to endorse Bush and
Rumsfeld's war on Iraq. They did this under the guise of a bill nominally
supporting the troops that, in reality, endorses Bush's decision to invade
and occupy Iraq. Only 11 congresspeople voted against the bill and 22
stood aside. The rest of the so-called representatives of the people
outdid many of their constituencies in their unabashed support for
America's latest imperial war. Indeed, many of those congressmembers who
voted for the this resolution and the war represent districts where the
sentiment continues to be against the current violence in the Gulf region.
Perhaps nowhere was this more apparent than in Vermont, which is
represented by its lone "independent" representative, Bernard Sanders .

Upon receiving notice of Sanders vote, I immediately called his office and
registered my dismay. Within days, I received a letter from the office
wherein Sanders reminded me that he voted against the October 2002
resolution granting GW Bush authority to use whatever force it required to
take over Iraq. He wrote that he believes history will prove this to have
been the correct vote. Further to his credit, before Sanders cast a yes
vote for the most recent resolution, he entered a short speech into the
Congressional Record decrying the partisan nature of the resolution. He
went on to state further that he did not support the Bush administration's
policies that "led us to where we are today." After stating his support
for the UN inspections regime and reminding the House of the "phenomenon
of blow-back," Sanders attacked the GOP leadership for cutting veteran's
benefits in the same session they voted to create more veterans.

There seems to be some kind of contradiction here. Sanders may have voted
against the budget that cut these veteran's benefits, but by voting to
support Bush's war (no matter how much he protested it), history will most
likely judge him to have sided with that leadership. Like a baseball line
score, when one looks back at a legislator's voting record, s/he only sees
the "yay" or the "nay." There is no play-by-play account--your team either
has the winning score or the losing score. No details are provided about
runners on third who got thrown out at the plate or an incredible pitching
performance. Likewise, when history looks back on Bernie's vote for this
resolution, they will see that he cast his lot with the GOP hawks, and not
the Democrats and others who voted against the bill, despite their support
for the human beings wearing America's uniform in Iraq.

At one time, Sanders claimed to be a socialist. When he was elected mayor
of Vermont's biggest city, Burlington, in 1980, his victory was almost
universally cheered by left and progressive folks in the US. Since he
moved to Washington six terms ago, however, those cheers have diminished,
especially amongst those who know him bes--his fellow Vermonters. It is
time the rest of the country wakes up to this truth: Sanders Sanders is
not a socialist and is not that progressive, especially when it comes to
matters of war and peace. Instead, Bernie's politics are reminiscent of
the Social Democrats of Germany during and after World War I. Despite a
popular groundswell against that war, the Social Democratic leadership
supported the war against the wishes of many in their own party. Then,
during the failed revolution of 1919 against the German government, it was
some of that same leadership that diverted the revolution from the masses
and had Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht killed, precisely because
these two revolutionaries exposed the duplicity and anti-worker policies
of the Social Democrats.

This is not the first time Sanders has supported America's wars. For those
of us with a memory longer than the average US news reporter, we can
remember Bernie's staunch support for Clinton's 100-day bombing of
Yugoslavia and Kosovo in 1999. I served as a support person for a dozen or
so Vermonters who sat-in in his Burlington office a couple weeks into that
war. Not only did Sanders refuse to talk with us via telephone (unlike his
Vermont counterparts in the Senate-Leahy and Jeffords), he had his staff
call the local police to arrest those who refused to leave until Sanders
spoke with them. The following week Sanders held a "town meeting" in
Montpelier, VT., where he surrounded himself with sympathetic war
supporters and one university professor who opposed the war and Bernie's
support for it. During the question and answer part of the meeting,
Sanders yelled at two of the audience's most vocal opponents to his
position and told them to leave if they didn't like what he had to say.
They chose to remain and point out that Bernie's style of democracy seemed
awfully authoritarian.

After the bombing of Yugoslavia had ended and the US plan to Balkanize the
Balkans neared its completion, I received many emails and calls regarding
our sit-in at Bernie's office and opposition to his politics of war. Most
of these messages came from outside of Vermont and considered what we did
to be counterproductive. After all, the messages stated, Sanders went to
Chiapas to support the Zapatistas and he's against the various free trade
agreements and the WTO. He's more of an ally than a foe, isn't he?

My answer to these challenges is that I'm not sure. So called progressive
politicians who do not draw the link between corporate America's wars and
its attack on social security, health care, the minimum wage, forty- hour
work week, and other issues working people consider important are doing us
a disservice. The wars fought by the US military are ultimately fought for
one reason only--to maintain and expand the power of corporate America at
the expense of workers and the poor around the world. Didn't neoliberal
writer Thomas Friedman write, "McDonald's cannot flourish without
McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps
the world safe for Silicon Valley's technologies is called the United
States Army, Air Force Navy and Marine Corps."

As the reader can tell, Friedman thinks this is a good thing. Judging from
Bernie's support for the current war on Iraq, the sanctions against that
country, and his support for previous US adventures in Afghanistan and
Yugoslavia, one wonders if Sanders thinks so, too. Is this what
progressives want to support? If not, I urge you to send Sanders a letter
opposing his war support (no matter how lukewarm it might be) instead of a
donation the next time you get a mailing in his name. Perhaps he will
listen and mount a movement in Congress to end funding for the folly in
Iraq. After all, in his letter to me, he wrote: "Please be assured that I
will remain a strong voice for peace during these difficult times."
Leading a congressional movement that calls for an immediate ceasefire and
refuses to fund Bush and Rumsfeld's folly in Iraq is a good place to use
that voice.

Ron Jacobs is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history of the Weather
Underground.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager