LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  March 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE March 2003

Subject:

World Water Forum in Kyoto, Japan

From:

Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:19:01 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (235 lines)

The 3rd World Water Forum: A Civil Society Backgrounder
=======================================================

by Maude Barlow, Council of Canadians

 From March 16-22 of this year, an estimated 8,000 people from all
over the world will gather in Kyoto, Japan, to attend the 3rd World
Water Forum. There, decisions will be made about the future of the
world's freshwater resources that will affect every living being on
the planet. This memo is offered as a brief history of the events and
players instrumental in the lead-up to this forum and is a critique
of the private sector interests that have developed around the
control of water.

The Backdrop

The world is running out of fresh water. Humanity is polluting,
diverting and depleting the finite wellspring of life at a startling
rate. Our per capita use of water is doubling every 20 years, at more
than twice the rate of human population growth. A legacy of factory
farming, flood irrigation, the construction of massive dams, toxic
dumping, wetland and forest destruction and urban and industrial
pollution has damaged the earth's surface water so badly that we are
now mining the underground water reserves far faster than nature can
replenish them.

Quite simply, unless we dramatically change our ways, between
one-half and two-thirds of humanity will be living with severe fresh
water shortages within the next quarter century. The global fresh
water crisis looms as one of the greatest threats ever to the
survival of our planet.

Tragically, this global call for action comes in an era guided by the
free-market principles of what has been called the "Washington
Consensus." This includes an unprecedented assault on the commons.
Everything is now for sale, even those areas of life, such as social
services and natural resources, that were once considered the common
heritage of humanity. Faced with the suddenly well-documented fresh
water crisis, governments and international institutions are
advocating the privatization and commodification of water. Price
water, they say in chorus; put it up for sale and let the market
determine its future.

At the same time, governments are signing away their control over
domestic water supplies to regional trade agreements like NAFTA and
the World Trade Organization (WTO). These global trade institutions
effectively give transnational corporations unprecedented access to
the fresh water resources of signatory countries. Already,
corporations have started to sue governments in order to gain access
to domestic water sources and, armed with the protection of these
international trade agreements, are setting their sights on the
commercialization of water.

The Corporate Players

There are ten major corporate players now delivering freshwater
services for profit. Between them, the two biggest - Vivendi and Suez
of France - deliver private water and wastewater services to over 200
million customers in 150 countries, and are in a race, along with the
others such as Bouygues SAUR, RWE-Thames Water and Bechtel-United
Utilities, to expand to every corner of the globe.

The performance of these companies in Europe and the developing world
has been well documented: huge profits, higher prices for water,
cut-offs to customers who cannot pay, little transparency in their
dealings, reduced water quality, bribery and corruption. They are
aggressively accelerating their operations in Third World countries
where debt-struck governments are forced to abandon public water
services and hand over control of local water supplies to private
interests. Based on the market policy known as "full cost recovery,"
the water companies are able to impose rate hikes that are
devastating to millions of poor people who cannot afford privatized
water.

A new type of water consortium has emerged in Germany which may be a
prototype for the future. Companies such as AquaMundo put together
giant investment pools using overseas government aid, private bank
investments and public utilities funds in the recipient country.
Then, in an arrangement called "cross-border leasing," they hire
local contractors to run the water services. Some keep their money in
tax havens, thus allowing them to avoid paying national taxes; this
lets them offer a "deal" to local cash-strapped municipalities.

Transnational water companies have become so powerful that they now
share in decision making with governments in international meetings.
United under the banner of the corporate lobby group, Business Action
for Sustainable Development, the water companies played a pivotal
role at the World Summit on Sustainable Development that was held in
Johannesburg, South Africa, last August 26-September 4. There, with
governments and the United Nations, they launched a "new" strategy
for the delivery of efficient water and sanitation services to the
world's poor which accelerates public-private partnerships,
guaranteeing the companies a steady profit from public funds.

Water for profit takes a number of other forms. The bottled water
industry is growing at an annual rate of 20 percent. Last year,
nearly 100 billion litres of bottled water were sold around the world
- most of it in non-reusable plastic containers, bringing in profits
of $22 billion to this highly-polluting industry. Fierce disputes,
especially in the Third World, are being waged between local
communities and companies like CocaCola and Nestle, aggressively
seeking new supplies of "boutique water." As one company explains,
water is now "a rationed necessity that may be taken by force."

Corporations are now involved in the construction of massive
pipelines to carry freshwater long distances for commercial sale
while others are constructing supertankers and giant sealed water
bags to transport vast amounts of water across the ocean to paying
customers. The mass movement of bulk water could have catalytic
environmental impacts. Nevertheless, the World Bank says that, "One
way or another, water will soon be moved around the world as oil is
now."

The Institutional Players

Private water companies are aided and abetted by a number of powerful
international institutions with whom they work closely. The main
source of financing of private water services in the Third World
comes from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which demands
private water services in exchange for debt relief, the World Bank,
which can withhold project funds unless a country cooperates, and a
myriad of regional banks, such as the European Investment Bank, the
Inter-American Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, and the
African Development Bank.

The World Bank serves the interests of water companies through the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which provides
loans to governments and can impose conditions in exchange for money,
and the International Finance Corporation, which provides direct
capital funding.

The World Trade Organization is another powerful institution that
promotes the commodification of water. The WTO is mandated to remove
tariff and non-tariff barriers to the free flow of goods, including
water, across national borders and is negotiating free trade in water
services through the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS).
The big water corporations have strategically positioned themselves
to play an effective role in the WTO through two powerful lobby
groups - the U.S. Coalition of Service Industries and the European
Forum on Services.

The United Nations has also been working closely with the big water
corporations. In July, 2000, the UN announced a "Global Compact" with
a number of global transnational companies, including Suez. And it is
through UN conferences and forums that three important new
international organizations promoting water-for-profit have been
created.

The Global Water Partnership was established in 1996 to reform water
utility systems and water resource management around the world and is
funded in part by the World Bank. The World Water Council, also
formed in 1996, sees itself as a policy think tank whose main task is
to provide decision makers with advice and assistance on global water
issues. Made up of 175 member groups, the WWC organized the 2nd World
Water Forum in The Hague in March, 2000.

The World Commission on Water for the 21st Century, formed in 1998,
is composed of 21 "eminent" persons and is mandated with fostering
sustainable use of water resources.

Representatives of the global water corporations are strategically
placed at the top levels of all three of these agencies. Their
industry association, the International Private Water Association,
works closely with the World Water Council, the World Bank and the UN.

The 2nd World Water Forum

All of the above were major players at the 2nd World Water Forum held
in The Hague in March, 2000, and are intimately involved in
preparations for the 3rd World Water Forum to be held in Japan in
March, 2003. From the beginning, the 2nd World Water Forum, which was
attended by over 5,000 people, was designed to be a showcase for
public-private partnerships and to create a "consensus" among all the
"stakeholders" that privatization and full cost recovery are the
answers for the world's water crisis. World Bank and water
corporation officials dominated the positions of power in every
session; civil society groups were not even given a place to meet.
Translation services for the myriad of non-English speaking delegates
were non-existent.

The World Water Council presented its pre-written World Water Vision
report endorsing an aggressive water-privatization agenda to the
Forum as a "fait accompli." The Vision, which also recommended a
corporate model of agriculture, was adopted by the powers that ran
the event, even though the statement was opposed by the majority of
civil society groups present.

As well, pushed by corporate representatives, the 140 governments
officials who attended the Ministerial Conference attached to the
Forum, agreed to weaken their final declaration. Instead of water
being declared a "basic human right" (which would mean that
governments were responsible for ensuring that all their citizens
have access to water on a not-for-profit basis), the government
delegates agreed only that water is a "basic human need," thereby
opening up the water market to companies on a for-profit basis.

However, it was not so simple for the organizers of the event. A new
international coalition of civil society organizations and trade
unions came together in the Hague to challenge the corporate
"consensus." The Blue Planet Project, made up of groups from many
countries, launched an "international effort to stop the
privatization of the world's fresh water" and challenged the Forum
organizers from the floor, at press conferences, and with a "NGO
Major Group Statement" to the Ministerial Conference. This statement
rejected the World Water Council's Vision, asserted that water is a
basic human right and called for the decommodification of water.

The 3rd World Water Forum

Since The Hague, civil society groups have been growing and
consolidating their work. They met at the World Social Forum in Porto
Alegre in January, 2002, and at the World Summit on Sustainable
Development in Johannesburg, in August, 2002. With international
groups present, Japanese civil society organizations met in March,
2002, to plan their strategy toward the 3rd World Water Forum. There,
they agreed to participate in the Forum as long as the goal was to
put forward a clear alternative vision and strategy to the World
Water Council.

This planning was further evolved at an international strategy
meeting held in Ottawa in October, 2002. Here participants agreed
that the main goals would be to split the World Water Council
"consensus" on a corporate model of water governance and to promote a
new democracy model of water governance. It was understood that the
Forum, unlike a meeting of the World Bank or the WTO, will attract
thousands of people who might actually agree with the emerging civil
society consensus around water and that it is essential to put
forward an alternative vision at the event.

The 3rd World Water Forum in Kyoto will play a major role in
determining the future of the world's freshwater resources. Civil
society must be there in strength. Future generations depend on it.

http://www.citizen.org/cmep/Water/cmep_Water/articles.cfm?ID=9130

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager