The list title is not just "Science," it also includes "for the people,"
which mandates using the list for what currently is the most flagrant
attack on the people of the world, u.s. foreign policy as a whole.
Being for the people and for the war is utterly incoherent. There should
be no need to debate that on a progressive list.
"J. Wyatt Ehrenfels" wrote:
> I for one support the war. This trend of
> co-opting discussion groups for political purposes of
> questionable relevance to the group is getting old
> J. Wyatt