MEDLIB-L Archives

March 2003, Week 1

MEDLIB-L@LIST.UVM.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Medical Libraries Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
T Scott Plutchak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:50:52 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
T Scott Plutchak <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Just to add my bit to the discussion of the Brandon-Hill lists from last
week, the lists have never gone through the regular BMLA/JMLA peer
review process.  MLA published the lists in the BMLA/JMLA as an
effective way of distributing them.  Now they can be made available more
quickly through the Brandon-Hill website.  Therefore, librarians should
consider the lists as published on the Brandon-Hill website to be just
as authoratative as they have been when printed in the BMLA/JMLA.

As noted in other comments, the announcement about the Brandon-Hill
lists no longer appearing in the JMLA is in my January editorial
(http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=141179), "The Art
and Science of Making Choices".

T. Scott Plutchak

Editor, Journal of the Medical Library Association

Director, Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2