LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  April 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE April 2003

Subject:

The greatest myth

From:

Ian Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:02:17 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (142 lines)

Prospect

The greatest myth
April 2003

American myths about the second world war fuel rhetoric over Iraq.
Real survivors of the "greatest generation" merit better history

William I Hitchcock

      On a windy Saturday in late October 2002, politicians, Hollywood moguls,
television personalities and American second world war veterans gathered in
front of the National D-Day Museum in New Orleans to pay tribute to historian
Stephen Ambrose, who had died of lung cancer a week earlier. Tom Hanks, Steven
Spielberg, and NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw all joined the proceedings. Former
President George H W Bush was also there and declared that "Stephen Ambrose was
one of the greatest historians of his time or any time." Though Ambrose himself
never served in the military, the memorial service befitted that of a war hero.

      Ambrose was the author of some 36 books, the best known of which
chronicled the experiences of soldiers in the US army during the second world
war. His 1992 book about a company of soldiers fighting in Europe, Band of
Brothers, was made into a television series. His 1994 book, D-Day, inspired
Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan. And Citizen Soldiers, about Americans fighting
in Europe from June 1944 to Germany's surrender, was a bestseller. Former US
Senator George McGovern, a veteran himself, noted at the memorial service that
Ambrose "probably reached more American readers than any historian in this
country's 200 years."

      What explains this outpouring of praise? Surely not the quality of
Ambrose's writing, nor the novelty of his insights, nor even his scholarship,
which came under fire for plagiarism. No, Ambrose's achievement was to have
almost single-handedly created a myth about how and why Americans fought and
won the second world war.

      The basic components of Ambrose's mythology are easily identified. First,
America won the war with little help from its allies. The D-Day invasion of
Normandy therefore takes pride of place in all his histories. Britain and
Russia rarely feature in his accounts of the war. One searches his books in
vain for accounts of the battle of Britain or Stalingrad. Second, the war was
won not by generals but by courageous young American men who "didn't want to
live in a world in which wrong prevailed." Third, the war was a contest between
democracy and fascism, and America's victory revealed which system was
superior. As Ambrose put it, the story of the war was that "the Boy Scouts from
America beat the Nazi youth."

      To be sure, the US made an enormous economic contribution to the overall
Allied war effort. But Americans did far less actual fighting in Europe than
the Russians. America lost 295,000 soldiers in combat (in both major theatres)
and suffered very few civilian casualties, while Russia paid the almost
unfathomable price of 25m lives. All the other major combatants suffered more
overall casualties in the war than the US, from Germany's 7m, to Poland's 6.8m,
Yugoslavia's 1.7m, France's 600,000, Britain's 380,000, and half a million each
for Austria, Greece, and Italy. As for why they fought, American veterans tend
to point out that they fought because, under conscription, they had little
choice and because they wanted to show loyalty to their fellow soldiers.

      Still, Ambrose's portraits of young American heroes have proven
irresistible to the American public, and other authors have joined in this
frenzy of glorification. Television journalist Tom Brokaw cashed in with his
1998 book The Greatest Generation: "They answered the call to save the world
from the two most powerful and ruthless military machines ever assembled,
instruments of conquest in the hands of fascist maniacs... They succeeded on
every front. They won the war; they saved the world." According to Brokaw,
these young Americans were not just great, but constitute "the greatest
generation any society has ever produced."

      These popular histories leave out awkward facts about the American
experience in the second world war, such as the unwillingness of the US to
accept Jews seeking refuge from Nazi Germany, the internment of Japanese
Americans, or the American firebombing of Japanese and German cities. More
importantly, these fuzzy historical accounts provide a false sense of
historical consciousness that can be manipulated in times of crisis.

      In rallying his country to wage war on Iraq, Bush has frequently dipped
into the grab-bag of popular nostrums provided by Ambrose and others. What is
America doing in Iraq? Not just disarming a tyrant or containing a dictator.
Not for us the small-bore work of arms inspections. Rather, in George Bush's
mind, every day is 7th December 1941. We have been attacked; we will respond;
and we shall go further, and liberate the oppressed from tyranny, for that is
our nature.

      On the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Bush declared that "this nation
has defeated tyrants and liberated death camps, and raised the lamp of liberty
to every captive land. We have no intention of ignoring or appeasing history's
latest gang of fanatics trying to murder their way to power." A few months
later, in his January 2003 State of the Union speech, Bush again drew a link
between Nazism and Saddam, claiming that "the ideology of power and domination
has appeared again, and seeks to gain the ultimate weapons of terror." And on
27th February 2003, he declared that America's cause "is right and just: the
liberty for an oppressed people." Just as America sought no empire in 1945, so
it does not seek one today. In postwar Germany and Japan, said the president,
"we did not leave behind occupying armies, we left constitutions and
parliaments." That news will surprise the Germans and Japanese, not to mention
the South Koreans, who since 1945 have been sharing their countries with large
numbers of US soldiers.

      In deploying these bland half-truths, Bush wants to place on the
defensive the Europeans who oppose war: to block America's righteous purpose is
akin to appeasing Hitler. But Bush's eagerness to embrace the legacy of the
second world war also betrays his discomfort in referring to other conflicts in
which the US has fought since 1945, few of which offer such unambiguous
lessons. In Korea, Americans fought a war for which they were woefully
unprepared, almost lost, then offered a truce. Today, the stalemate continues.
Were the 50,000 Americans killed in Korea less courageous than the "greatest
generation"? What of the Vietnam war, when American leaders also hearkened back
to Hitler and appeasement to justify the defence of freedom and the liberation
of Asia from communist tyranny? Some 58,000 Americans died there, but they have
no place in the pantheon of American military glory.

      Certainly, the millions of young Americans who fought in the second world
war deserve to be honoured by posterity. But those soldiers earned their glory
only after great hardship, and it is that genuine sacrifice Bush often fails to
recall. Yet sacrifice - the deprivation of comforts and safety, the surrender
of self in a larger purpose - was central to the second world war experience.
More than 16m Americans served in the military during that war, which was then
more than 12 per cent of the population. Everyone knew somebody in the service,
and on the home front, rationing and privation were constant reminders of the
reality of war. This sense of national sacrifice was notably absent from later
wars. In the Korean and Vietnam wars, only about 4 per cent of the US
population did time in the military, and during the Gulf war, the figure
dropped to 1 per cent. As for casualties, in the second world war, 1.8 per cent
of all those Americans enrolled in the services were killed in action. In
Vietnam, that figure dropped to 0.6 per cent and in Korea 0.5 per cent. In the
Gulf war, 148 soldiers were killed in combat, a mere 0.005 per cent of those on
active duty.

      Thus, as American leaders invoke the glories of past wars, the actual
number of Americans who have served in any branch of the military, or seen
combat, or known anyone who was killed in combat, has dropped off sharply. And
because so few Americans now have personal knowledge of war, we are that much
more vulnerable to the temptations offered by an inflated rhetoric of heroism,
guts and glory. It is telling that those Americans who do remember the second
world war tend to oppose war with Iraq: a Los Angeles Times poll taken in
January showed that, while 58 per cent of Americans supported sending troops to
Iraq, only 35 per cent of those over 77 did so. Here is an awkward paradox:
despite the president's call to arms, the members of the "greatest generation"
are those least willing to fall in line.


http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager