LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  August 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE August 2003

Subject:

Scientists Debate Value of Citizens' Advisory Panels

From:

Art McGee <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:27:10 -0400

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (136 lines)

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/6463875.htm

Knight Ridder Newspapers

August 5, 2003

Scientists Debate Value of Citizens' Advisory Panels

By Robert S. Boyd

WASHINGTON - Scientists perform many wonders, but sometimes
they scare the dickens out of people. Genetic tinkering,
radioactive nuclear waste, cloning, embryonic stem cells,
robots that reproduce themselves and other high-tech
developments have stirred widespread distrust and alarm.

To address such fears, the National Science Foundation, an
arm of the federal government, is experimenting with a
system of citizens' advisory panels that it hopes can help
head off future eruptions. The panels consider the ethical,
social and practical implications of new technologies and
recommend policies that might reduce misunderstanding and
obstruction.

For example, the worldwide uproar over genetically modified
foods - crops whose genes have been artificially altered -
has wrecked foreign markets for some American products.
Resistance to so-called "Frankenfoods" also is spreading in
the United States. Billions of dollars are at stake.

"We don't want another backlash like the one over
genetically modified foods," said Jane Macoubrie, the leader
of the NSF project at North Carolina State University in
Raleigh. "Current practices are producing a hostile public
and decreasing trust in government and science. Citizens
perceive technology as out of control."

Each panel consists of 15 nonexpert volunteers who spend
three months studying a particular controversy. They read
background materials, question authorities representing
various points of view, debate among themselves and try to
reach a consensus. Finally they write a report offering
their advice on the issue to policy-makers such as state
governors and members of Congress.

The first of these advisory panels recommended, among other
things, that the government tighten regulations for growing
genetically modified foods and require the products to be
labeled clearly, so shoppers could choose to avoid them.

Some European countries require such foods to be labeled.
Canada is considering a voluntary system. The U.S. Food &
Drug Administration so far has declined to require labeling.

At a hearing before the House of Representatives Science
Committee in April, Langdon Winner, a political scientist at
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., said
citizens' panels would "establish a voice for ordinary
folks." He urged Congress to "to create ways in which small
panels of ordinary, disinterested citizens, selected in much
the way that we now choose juries, (can) be assembled to
examine important societal issues."

The House passed a bill in May directing the government to
seek the public's advice on nanotechnology, the
fast-developing science of the extremely small.

The bill, which hasn't passed the Senate, is a response to
fears roused by such books as "Prey," a science-fiction
thriller by Michael Crichton in which murderous "nanorobots"
run amok.

"Why not include the public in deliberations about
nanotechnolgy early on in the process, rather than after the
products reach the market?" Winner asked.

Macoubrie's group conducted two preliminary "Citizens
Technology Forums," as they were formally called, last year.
Six more are under way at North Carolina State and a
nationwide trial is planned for next year.

For the first conference, panelists met face-to-face. The
others are being conducted mostly over the Internet, a novel
use of high technology to counter fears about high
technology.

"Citizens, scientists and policy makers are all dissatisfied
with the status quo," Macoubrie, a specialist in
communications theory, said in a telephone interview.
"Citizens are afraid. Scientists think uninformed citizens
are incompetent to comment on technology. Policy makers are
besieged on all sides. Everybody sees a problem. No one is
happy."

So the NSF asked North Carolina State to devise a process
that would minimize these problems by giving citizens
unbiased, factual information on which to make sound
decisions. It's modeled after a similar process that's been
used in Denmark for 15 years.

"Once people have knowledge they get over their fears,"
Macoubrie said.

Patrick Hamlett, the director of the Program on Science,
Technology & Society at North Carolina State, said consensus
conferences were far different from hired pollsters
telephoning people at dinnertime, or from political focus
groups, which spend a couple of hours in an evening on a
topic.

The NSF-sponsored panels spend three weekends over the
course of two months, for a total of 20 hours, considering
their assigned issues, plus time studying on their own.
Panelists are selected from volunteers who respond to
newspaper ads. They are paid $500 for their participation.

"We are trying to measure what the average citizen who
bothered to study an issue would think about it," Hamlett
explained.

What impact the conferences will have on public policy
remains to be seen. "When I wake up at night, that's what
bothers me," Hamlett said.

One skeptic on the Science committee, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher,
R-Calif., scoffed that they will "just give the nuts a
podium."

Macoubrie, the project leader, is undeterred.

"I believe that high-quality citizen decisions can come out
of these conferences," she said.

Copyright (c) 2003 KR Washington Bureau and wire service
sources. All Rights Reserved.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager