LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  August 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE August 2003

Subject:

Nuclear terrorism

From:

Ian Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:52:18 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (130 lines)

August marks another anniversary of the atomic bombing of Japan,
the ultimate act of terrorism in which 231,920 people have now died, the
latest, the children of 1945, from a plague of cancers.

John Pilger :14 Aug 2003


     I first visited Hiroshima 22 years after the atomic bombing. Although the
city had been completely rebuilt with glass boxes and ring roads, its suffering
was not difficult to find. Beside the river, less than a mile from where the
bomb burst, stilts of shacks rose from the silt, and languid human silhouettes
searched pyramids of rubbish, providing a glimpse of a Japan few can now
imagine.

            They were the survivors. Most of them were sick, impoverished,
unemployed and socially excluded. Such was the fear of the "atomic plague" that
people changed their names; most moved away. The sick received treatment in a
crowded state-run hospital. The modern Atomic Bomb Hospital, surrounded by
pines and overlooking the city, which the Americans built and ran, took only a
few patients for "study".

            On 6 August, the anniversary of the bombing, the Mainichi Shimbun
reported that the number of people killed directly and after exposure to
radiation had now reached 231,920. Today, in the same hospital wards I visited,
there are the children of 1945, dying from a predictable plague of cancers.

            The first Allied journalist to reach Hiroshima following the
bombing was Wilfred Burchett, the Australian war correspondent of the London
Daily Express. Burchett found thousands of survivors suffering mysterious
symptoms of internal haemorrhage, spotted skin and hair loss. In a historic
despatch to the Express that began, "I write this as a warning to the world",
he described the effects of radiation.

            The Allied occupation authorities vehemently denied Burchett's
reports. People had died only as a result of the blast, they lied, and the
"embedded" Allied press amplified this. "No radioactivity in Hiroshima ruin"
was the headline in the New York Times of 13 September 1945. Burchett had his
press accreditation withdrawn and was issued with an expulsion order from
Japan, which was later rescinded. Japanese film shot in the hospitals was
confiscated and sent to Washington, where it was classified as top secret and
not released for 23 years.

            The true motive for using this ultimate weapon of mass destruction
was suppressed even longer. The official truth was that the bomb was dropped to
speed the surrender of Japan and save Allied lives. Today, as the public
becomes more attuned to the scale of government deception, this was probably
the biggest lie of all. As the historian Gar Alperovitz, among others, has
documented, US political and military leaders, knowing that Japan's surrender
was already under way, believed the atomic bombing was militarily unnecessary.
In 1946 the US Strategic Bombing Survey confirmed this. None of this was shared
with the public, nor the belief in Washington that the atomic bomb "experiment"
in Japan, as President Truman put it, would demonstrate US primacy to the
Russians.

            Since then declassified files have shown that the United States has
almost used nuclear weapons on at least three occasions: twice in the 1950s,
during the Korean war and in Indo-China (against Ho Chi Minh's forces, which
were then routing the French), and during the 1973 Arab/Israeli war. During the
1980s, President Reagan threatened the use of "limited" nuclear weapons, until
huge demonstrations in Europe curtailed the American short-range missile
programme. Under George W Bush's essentially Reaganite administration, the US
(and British) military's love affair with nuclear weapons is on the rise again.
In 2001, the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the
landmark agreement with the Russians signed in 1972. This was the first time in
the nuclear era that Washington had renounced a major arms control accord.

            The most important official behind this is John Bolton, the
under-secretary of state for arms control and international security: an ironic
title, surely, given the extraordinary stand Bolton has taken and the threats
he has made. A former Reagan man who is probably the most extreme of George W
Bush's "neo-cons", Bolton had his appointment endorsed by Senator Jesse Helms,
one of America's greatest warmongers, with these words: "John Bolton is the
kind of man with whom I would want to stand at Armageddon...for the final
battle between good and evil."

            Bolton is Defence Secretary Rumsfeld's man at the "liberal" State
Department. He is a strong advocate of the blurring of the distinction between
nuclear and conventional weapons. This is described vividly in last year's
leaked Nuclear Posture Review, in which the Pentagon expresses its "need" for
low-yield nuclear weapons for possible attacks on a shopping list of "enemies
of the United States": Libya, Syria, Iran, Iraq and North Korea. The inclusion
of Iraq is significant. During the long charade about Saddam Hussein's elusive
weapons of mass destruction, no mention was made in Washington of US
willingness to use nuclear weapons against Iraq. It was left to Britain's
Defence Secretary, the caustic Geoff Hoon, to disclose this. On 26 March 2002,
Hoon told parliament that "some states" - he mentioned Saddam Hussein by name -
"can be absolutely confident that in the right conditions we would be willing
to use our nuclear weapons". No British minister has ever made such an outright
threat. As Hoon himself later admitted, British policy is merely an extension
of US policy.

            As for John Bolton, there is little doubt that he has been assigned
to lead the charge against North Korea, which has nuclear weapons. Bolton has
been travelling the world trying to assemble a "coalition" that will send
warships to "interdict" North Korean vessels. Two weeks ago he was in Seoul,
where he unleashed a remarkable stream of abuse against the North Korean
dictator Kim Jong-il who, he said, ran "a hellish nightmare". (In reply,
Pyongyang described Bolton as "human scum".)

            Last month I interviewed Bolton in Washington and asked him: "If
you stop ships, isn't there an echo of what happened in 1962, with the threat
of nuclear war? Won't the North Korean regime be moved to defend themselves
with the nuclear weapons they have?" He replied that a North Korean ship had
already been stopped and "the regime did nothing in response".

            "But if you take action, the nuclear risk is there, isn't it?" I
asked. He replied, "The risk is there if we don't take action... of them
blackmailing other countries." He quoted Condoleezza Rice, Bush's closest
adviser: "We don't want to wait for the mushroom cloud."

            Two weeks ago, on the 58th anniversary of Hiroshima's incineration,
a secret conference was held at the Strategic Air Command in Omaha, Nebraska,
the base where, 24 hours a day, the United States keeps its "nuclear vigil".
(It was the setting for Stanley Kubrick's Dr Strangelove.) In attendance were
cabinet members, generals and leading scientists from America's three main
nuclear weapons laboratories. Members of Congress were banned, even as
observers. The agenda was the development of "mini-nukes" for possible use
against "rogue states".

            The mantle of the greatest rogue state of all cannot be in doubt.
Since the end of the cold war, the United States has repudiated, rejected or
subverted all the major treaties designed to prevent war with weapons of mass
destruction, especially nuclear weapons. This is the rampant power to which,
says Hoon, we are inexorably tied.

            That, not an establishment brawl between the government and the
BBC, ought to be our most urgent concern.

http://pilger.carlton.com/print/133078

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager