LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  August 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE August 2003

Subject:

Frankensteins in the Pentagon

From:

Ian Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:06:28 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (217 lines)

Frankensteins in the Pentagon
DAPRA's Creepy Bioengineering Program

By Cheryl Seal
25 August 2003
DARPA Bioengineering Program Seeks to Turn Soldiers Into Cyborgs

Not long ago, the public was stunned by the practical and moral idiocy of the
Pentagon researcher (and unprosecuted war criminal) John Poindexter, who
proposed a 'football pool' scheme for predicting terrorist attacks. We all
laughed at such insanity and were relieved to see the scheme speedily
deep-sixed. However, this bit of lunacy was just the lightest ice in the tip of
the very large, very dark iceberg that the Pentagon's research program, better
known as DARPA, has become.

Just a few weeks before the bizarro world 'terrorism gambling' project was
exposed, a DARPA (which stands for Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency)-sponsored conference was held in Washington, DC, that showcased the
latest love child of the Bush Pentagon: military bioengineering. The euphemisms
being used by the Pentagon to disguise the true nature of this research are
being spread as thick as bondo and cheap paint at a used car lot. For example,
the title of the conference was: 'Harvesting Biology for Defense Technology,'
while the subheading of the section on human 'bioengineering' was entitled,
rather ominously, in light of the military's history, 'Enhancing Human
Performance.'

So how does the Bush DARPA seek to 'enhance' human performance? In a kinder,
gentler administration, the solution would be better training, better food,
better pay, more leave time, and greater use of stress-reducing duty rotations.
But this is not a kinder, gentler -or even rational- administration. Bush and
Company plan to enhance soldier performance by squeezing the most that can be
humanly -and not so humanly- squeezed from troops without having to resort to
anything as primitive as decent pay. Their motto: Get the most human output for
the least human input: After all, it's the corporate way!

Here are some examples of DARPA 'Human-enhancing' schemes:

The 'Brain Interface Program' is the most lavishly funded of nearly all the
DARPA bioengineering efforts (the project has been given $24 million for the
next two years). It is aimed at developing ways to 'integrate' soldiers into
machines -literally- by wiring them (remotely or directly) to their planes,
tanks, or computers. An implantable brain chip is now under development in this
sick program, which has already proudly demonstrated how rats can be turned
into living robots through the manipulation of stimulus-response signals in the
brain via electrodes. The Pentagon hopes to use these pathetic, 'modified'
creatures (you should see the photos -makes you want to join People for the
Ethical Treatment of Animals!) in mine clearance.

"The use of animals in warfare is ugly enough without the further insult to
their dignity involved in turning them into involuntary cyborgs," writes James
Meek in the Guardian. "And a military command committed to the use of creatures
which are part-animal, part-machine, is going to be that bit less reluctant to
interfere in its soldiers in similar ways."

But, as the conference heading would have you believe, DARPA isn't
interfering -it is merely 'enhancing.' After all, as an official at DARPA
recently observed, "The human is becoming the weakest link in defense systems."

Enhancement efforts at the Brain Interface Program are now progressing nicely.
The chief Frankenstein of the project, one Alan S. Rudolph, now wants to be
able to transmit images or sound directly into the brains of rats -and of
course, later, soldiers...or prisoners of war (just imagine the torture
potential here!).

The 'Metabolic Dominance and Engineered Tissue' program is aimed at being able
to artificially pump up soldier endurance and muscle strength.

The 'Persistence in Combat' program is a bizarre self-treatment scheme which
would include pain-reducing and blood-stopping devices and techniques soldiers
would apply to their own wounds -even moderately severe ones- thereby bypassing
the need for a medic and enabling a soldier to keep fighting, despite serious
wounds! Yep, just keep on runnin' through the jungle on that broken leg or with
that bullet in the gut! Once that pain-obliterating electrode in your brain is
activated, you won't feel a thing!

The 'Continuous Assisted Perfomance' program hopes to find biotechnological
ways (implants, metabolic manipulation, etc) to make it possible to push
exhausted soldiers on without loss of performance for up to seven days without
sleep.

The above technologies are referred to by DARPA under the subheading of
'neuroengineering.' Neuroengineering was played around with back in the early
1990s (no doubt given the initial green light by Bush I), but became a rather
minor and exotic 'side line' of research in the Clinton years. Since Bush II
came on the scene, however, neuroengineering programs have been shoved into a
position of major importance.

The wording of the descriptions of all the 'human enhancement' programs is
extremely deceptive -even deliberately misleading. For example, having read the
Brain Interface Program background in Nature magazine, I know for a fact that
'noninvasive' technologies (contrary to what is claimed in the description) are
not currently the project priority and are considered at best a remote goal.
What is in the works right now is a microprocessing chip that can be implanted
beneath the skull and remotely manipulated. In a June 19 Nature article,
Rudolph estimated that a usable chip that could be field-tested in rats is
about two years away, while noninvasive technologies (whatever that means -how
can it not be when you are manipulating someone's neurons?) is only an
aspired-to ideal.

The researchers also try to hide behind grandiose-sounding claims of working to
the greater good as a way to fool the public, and possibly themselves, into
believing that these projects really do have some benign reasons for being, if
only to promote the cause of 'science.' That is why nearly every program in the
conference guide comes with a 'suggested benign use' (my own flippant phrase).
After all, whines Rudolph, today's soldier's brain chip may be tomorrow's brain
damage therapy. We should be impressed? After all, the same argument was used
by Hitler's researchers to justify their heartless 'medical' experiments on
Jews, gypsies, retarded children, enemy soldiers, prisoners, et al.). What is
truly chilling is that these technologies, in essence, are seeking to turn our
soldiers into human fighting machines, sacrificing their autonomy and, very
likely, long-term quality of life for short term military savings -savings that
will go right into the pockets of the government's beloved defense contractors.
There is no way these technologies can be benign -the whole concept is totally
against what America stands for and against any other reasonable code of
ethics, for that matter. In addition, with the way they are being rushed
through the research gamut, there is no way they can be proven safe, especially
long-term. I can just imagine the residual tissue damage, cancers,
post-traumatic stress disorders, etc, that DARPA-style 'human enhancement' will
inflict on our guys and gals in uniform. Remember Agent Orange? Remember
aboveground nuke testing? Remember submarine sailors being gassed as a DARPA
'experiment,' or those soldiers, most of them black or Hispanic, fed LSD? As it
is, more than half of all Gulf War vets have now filed for disability because
of the devastating effects of Gulf War Syndrome.

The only variable that has been conclusively linked to the syndrome is the
ingestion by US Gulf War soldiers (and some British troops) of a 'cocktail' of
anti-bacterial inoculations (including the anthrax vaccine) and an anti-nerve
gas agent. A clear pattern was shown: Soldiers who did not receive the
'cocktail' (including all French soldiers) did not later report Gulf War
syndrome symptoms, even if exposed to depleted uranium (another suspected
cause). This finding came out in European journals way back in the mid-1990s.
French commanders and many British commanders seriously questioned the wisdom
of the cocktail at the time. But not the Pentagon! After all, the cocktail was
'human enhancing.' So now, will beneath-the-skull implants for soldiers become
as mandatory as anthrax vaccines? (for my theory of Gulf War syndrome, read the
paragraph after this article).

With the insane Bush DARPA plunging forward with its Darth Vader research, the
possibilities for horrific misuse and long-term consequences are staggering.
For example, one of the DARPA Frankensteins, one Ted Berger of the University
of Southern California, envisions pilots who would be able to pilot their
planes by thought alone, thanks to brain implants. This concept, like so much
military research, fails to consider realistic variables. To name just a few of
these: what about the impact of fear, exhaustion, pain, or dizziness on
effective neural function? Whoops -didn't mean to crash into that busy highway!
Or how about ruthless generals turning their pilots into 'instant Kamikazes' as
a shortcut to winning a battle? Or, for that matter, who's to stop the enemy or
a lone terrorist who has gained access to the technology from finding a way to
repeat 9/11 scenarios using our own pilots or soldiers? At the very least,
there can be no benign consequence to pushing men and women beyond their
'unassisted' endurance. The risk of brain damage, brain tumors, cancers,
catastrophic immune responses similar to host-graft disease, heart attacks
(from electronic signals triggering arrhythmias), and other assaults on the
body seem the most imminent dangers. But who knows what unforeseen consequences
may emerge? For example, the children conceived during and right after the
first above-ground nuclear tests are just now approaching 60 - who knows what
sort of long smoldering cancers may yet erupt into 'epidemics.'

One chief neuroethicist at the Center for Cognitive Neurosciences at the
University of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia has questioned not just the ethics
of some of DARPA's research, but the ethics of those researchers who accept
DARPA money. If they do so knowing the research is questionable, she asserts,
then they have compromised their ethics.

And, I might add, our soldier's lives.

Resources on DARPA's Neuroengineering Project

Click here for information on the DARPA-sponsored convention.
http://tinyurl.com/lc7w
Click here for James Meek's Roborat Ethics article.
http://www.wireheading.com/roborats/ethics.html
Click here for tips on how to investigate military research at your university.
http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Housing/8930/guide2.html

To help get you started, here's a list of names of DARPA 'human enhancement'
program research fund recipients and their universities. Miguel Nicolelis, Duke
University at Durham, North Carolina; Tomaso Poggio, James DiCarlo and Christof
Koch, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Sam Deadwyler, Wake Forest
University; Jon Kaas, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; Ted Berger,
University of Southern California.

Afterword: My Gulf War Syndrome Theory

Based on hundreds of readings I have done on the human immune system in the
course of my abstracting job, I have formulated the following theory:

All vaccines cause a temporary weakening of the immune system as they 'kick
in,' including the common flu vaccine. This effect lasts from about 7-14 days.
If you combine a mishmash of powerful and, let's face it, largely unproven
vaccines, along with an anti-nerve gas agent, you will be dealing a formidable
temporary blow to your natural immune system. Because the immune system is
responsible not just for warding off viruses and bacteria, but for confronting
all other sorts of foreign 'invaders' including irritants such as toxic
particles in the air, chemical sprays (bug spray, sun screen, etc.), a slammed
immune system (ask any AIDS patient) can leave you wide open to all sorts of
nasty stuff, from skin lesions to tumors. So, I believe the cocktail was a
secondary agent of damage -primary elements of the soldiers' immune systems
were knocked out, then assaulted by carcinogens, irritants, and other elements
that ordinarily could have been resisted, as they were by most troops who did
not receive the vaccines. This would also explain why the symptoms of the
Syndrome are so diverse. It all depended on what you happened to get exposed to
out in the field following the cocktail and how, specifically, your immune
system responded to the assault on it by the vaccine cocktail.

Copyright 2003 by the News Insider and Cheryl Seal

Copyright notice

The use of the editorials published on this site is free, as long as News
Insider is notified and referred to as the source of the information cited. We
believe in the free sharing of information, but we do not encourage plagiarism.
If our editorials are of use to you, please contact us to let us know. Thank
you for your cooperation.

http://www.newsinsider.org/seal/frankensteins_in_the_pentagon.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager