LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  August 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE August 2003

Subject:

Legalization of Human Genetic Engineering Sparks Controversy

From:

Ian Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:04:17 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (102 lines)

Legalization of Human Genetic Engineering Sparks Controversy
Dwayne Hunter
Betterhumans Staff
Thursday, August 21, 2003, 4:19:03 PM CT

A decision by the New Zealand government to introduce a bill that some say will
promote human germline modification -- genetic engineering of the species --
has sparked debate among experts around the world.

GE Free NZ, a New Zealand-based nonprofit organization concerned with local,
national and international developments in genetic engineering, describes the
Human Assisted Reproductive Technology bill proposed by the New Zealand
government as eugenic legislation that hasn't been seen since Nazi Germany in
the 1930s.

Advocates of human genetic modification have countered those claims, saying
that GE Free NZ and its supporters are fear mongering and pointing out that a
ban on germline modification would limit reproductive options and subject
reproduction to greater state control.

"Most dangerous"

GE Free NZ says that New Zealand members of parliament have no public mandate
to make the country the world's first to legalize inheritable human genetic
engineering.

The group calls such genetic engineering "the most dangerous of all eugenic
technologies" and says that the New Zealand government has added to controversy
by also proposing to legalize the use of sex selection, embryo selection and
mandatory genetic testing.

"This presents a nightmare scenario for the potential 'genetic cleansing' of
the NZ population," says Jon Carapiet, a spokesperson for GE Free NZ. "The HART
bill needs to be drastically changed."

While HART prohibits some reproductive technologies, such as human cloning and
the creation of human-nonhuman hybrid embryos, GE Free NZ says that this raises
more questions about the government's motivations

"Why the government has rightly proposed a ban on human cloning, but not
inheritable human genetic engineering is a mystery," says Carapiet. "They are
both species-altering technologies that can usher in a posthuman era."

Enlisting support

GE Free NZ has enlisted written testimony from a number of people who oppose
human genetic modification, including Mae Wan Ho of the UK Institute of Science
in Society, David King of the UK Human Genetics Alert, Richard Hayes of the US
Center for Genetics and Society, Stuart Newman of New York Medical College and
Gregor Wolbring, a biochemist, bioethicist and disability rights activist from
the University of Alberta in Canada.

Newman calls HART scientifically inconsistent and medically dangerous in
allowing the legalization of germline engineering. He believes that there is no
way to assess the safety of germline procedures in human beings without
exposing prospective children to unwarranted experimentation, and that the
experimental alteration of prospective humans cannot be justified under any
ethical standard of justifiable risk.

King also opposes germline engineering. "Humankind would begin to take charge
of its own evolution, and so enter into a new era of human history," he says.

Fear mongering

Other experts in reproductive technologies and human genetic engineering have
accused GE Free NZ and its supporters of fear mongering and working to limit
reproductive choice.

Gregory Stock, author of Redesigning Humans and director of the Program on
Medicine, Technology and Society at the University of California, Los Angeles
says that germline modification opponents have a tendency to overreact.

"Even cautious approaches to genetic interventions and research are decried by
bioluddite activists who see any alteration of human genetics as pernicious,"
says Stock. "They conveniently ignore that genetic selection is going on with
every reproductive decision we make."

"We should work on developing safe, reliable, beneficial new technologies,
instead of engaging in deceptive fear mongering about the possibilities of the
future," says Stock

Improve human flourishing

Nick Bostrom, an Oxford University philosopher and chair of the World
Transhumanist Association, an organization that supports the use of technology
for transcending human limitations, sees human genetic modification as an
important way to prevent disease and improve human flourishing.

"Genetic medicine is not black magic, as some bioconservative writers seem to
think, but a natural outgrowth of our increasing understanding of the
biochemistry that underlies health and sickness," says Bostrom.

Bostrom believes that society can create a general regulatory framework for
germline modification, but he thinks that it would be both unethical and
dangerous for society to eliminate reproductive choices of parents by banning
germline modification.

"History teaches us that governments ought not to be deciding what sort of
people there should or shouldn't be," says Bostrom. "One mold doesn't fit all."

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-08-21-3

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager