LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  November 2003

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE November 2003

Subject:

Bill Gates Rescue Package

From:

Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 5 Nov 2003 07:48:14 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (167 lines)

--> If you pass this comment along to others please explain that
Commentaries are a premium sent to Sustainer Donors of Z/ZNet and
that to learn more folks can consult ZNet at http://www.zmag.org

==================================

ZNet Commentary
Bill Gates Rescue Package November 05, 2003
By Devinder Sharma

Bill Gates donation of US $ 25 million for biofortification -
breeding crops with higher levels of micronutrients - is an effort to
provide a life-saving shot to the dying family of public-sector
international agricultural research institutes. Ironically, the
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR),
responsible for ushering in the green revolution technology, is now
seriously grappling for its own survival.

Faced with huge staff layoffs, drastic cut in research programmes,
declining research output, vanishing financial commitments, the CGIAR
is contemplating a series of mergers to stay afloat. Gasping for
breadth, the CGIAR is even considering the merger of two of its
premier institutes - the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)
at Los Banos, in the Philippines, and the International Crop Research
Centre for Wheat and Maize (CIMMYT), in Mexico City.

Such has been the desperation that the CGIAR deviated from its stand
of public good when in 2002 it decided to take on board Syngenta
Foundation. This major shift in its known public image had prompted
the CG's committee of non-government organisations to freeze its
relationship with the organisation. The NGOs believe that the CG has
abdicated its responsibility of ensuring food security for the
world's poor by bringing in technologies that lead to economically
viable and sustainable farming systems. Instead the CGIAR has become
a service centre for the corporate interests.

The decade of the 1970s was the period when CGIAR's green revolution
technology, supported by appropriate national farm policies, ushered
in food self-sufficiency for many of the chronically food deficit
countries. Two decades later, in the 1990s, intensive agriculture had
begun to take its toll.

Not only the deteriorating environment, thousands of farmers all over
the world - from the technology-sophisticated and subsidy-rich United
States, European Union, Japan and Canada to the poor and marginalized
majority world in India, China, Argentina, Zimbabwe, Mexico, the
Philippines and you name it, an ever increasing number of farmers
have been involved in a serial death dance. Millions of others are
reeling under heavy debts, mortgaging in the process the meagre piece
of land on which they farm.

The CGIAR has remained a mute spectator. Not even once, did it find
it worthwhile to look into the real causes behind the new epidemic.
Ironically, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI),
which is a beneficiary of Bill Gates largesse, focussed more on how
to push in the market reforms. IFPRI is on the forefront of
suggesting dismantling of the national policies that had propelled
countries to take advantage of the green revolution technology. It
has even gone to the extent of suggesting that food aid, which is
governed by an inefficient UN Food Convention, be actually brought
under the World Trade Organisation. Isn't it time, the CGIAR begins
its restructuring by closing down the IFPRI - after all, where is the
need to duplicate what the World Bank can do more effectively!

The CG instead began to work for the corporate interests. It forgot
its duty and responsibility towards the toiling farmers. An
international research system, dominated entirely by western experts
who hardly knew a little about the ground realities in the developing
countries, sooner or later had to collapse. It became of victim of
its own flawed and donor-driven policies.

Bill Gates donation therefore comes as a blessing in disguise for the
failing CGIAR. Ever since the release of the dwarf wheat and rice
crop varieties, which was some 25-30 years ago, the international
agricultural research centres have only been engaged in maintenance
research - trying to protect what has already been evolved and
released. With no clear-cut direction and vision, the donors had
drifted away. The CGIAR therefore attempted a number of options -
suggesting special thematic research programmes under the 'challenge
programmes' - and then remained undecided on the approach to follow.
Food security was dumped for climate change, and sustainable
agriculture for market reforms and globalisation.

Biofortification was one of the misplaced research priorities that
CGIAR had proposed earlier but was unable to undertake in the light
of the public outcry. Nor did it make any research sense - research
programmes are no longer based on common sense - to breed for crops
that supplement micronutrients. The much-touted 'golden rice', which
contains a miniscule addition of beta-carotene in rice, has now been
widely accepted to be a misadventure. Distinguished scientists have
already gone on record saying that golden rice cannot address the
problem of Vit A deficiency.

In any case, fortified crops cannot eradicate nutrient deficiency.
Whether the newly evolved genetically-modified crops contains
supplements of Vit A, iron or zinc, these foods will not be helpful
for those who need it desperately - the malnourished. The reason is
simple. The human body requires adequate amount of fats to absorb
these nutrients, which is conspicuously absent in the malnourished
populations.

The hungry therefore gain nothing by eating these food supplements -
in turn would be able to afford less food because of the high price
as a result of more strict intellectual property control. The
biofortification programme in reality therefore is aimed at restoring
the credibility of the discredited biotechnology industry, which is
receiving a severe drubbing in Europe and elsewhere in Asia.

Bill Gates was probably not properly advised, and for obvious
reasons. Harvest Plus, a mere CGIAR public relations outfit, is in
dire need of financial resources and therefore used the emotional
card of hunger and malnutrition to seek funding from the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation. Not realising that 'hidden hunger', as
nutrient deficiency is generally referred to, cannot be removed by
providing the poor and hungry with an 'informed choice' of novel and
functional foods.

What the poor need is food - and which is abundantly available - and
that too rich in nutrients. In India, for instance, which is home to
one-third of the world's hungry and malnourished, more than 30
million tonnes of wheat and rice (which was a record 65 million
tonnes a year ago) are rotting in the open. The surplus food contain
an average of nine percent proteins - four to nine times more than
any fortified GM crop that scientists have developed so far.

A greater humanitarian purpose would have been served if Bill Gates
had instead donated grants to institutes and groups that would have
helped reach the available food to the poor, to ensure that the
hungry are adequately fed. The reality is that the poor and hungry do
not have the means to buy the food that is available, much of it
rotting in front of their dry eyes. If the hungry cannot afford to
buy their normal dietary requirement of rice (or for that matter any
other staple food) for a day, how does the CGIAR propose to make
available 'golden rice' to them is something that Bill Gates probably
forgot to ask. What is not being realised by the global scientific
and development community (including CGIAR) is that if they had aimed
at eradicating hunger in the first place, there would be no 'hidden
hunger'.

Bill Gates has to understand that biotechnology, the way it is being
promoted by corporate interests, has the potential to further the
great divide between haves and have-nots. The twin engines of
economic growth - technological revolution and globalisation - will
only widen the existing gap between the well fed and the hungry
masses. Biotechnology will, in reality, push more people in the
hunger trap. With public attention and resources being diverted from
the ground realities, hunger will only grow in the years to come.

CGIAR's blind support the corporate agenda, therefore, is a pointer
to the growing irrelevance of the international agricultural research
institutes. Such is the poverty of ideas to meet the growing food
needs of the world that the CGIAR has been gradually made to die a
premature death, much if it because of its own undoing. It is high
time the CGIAR board, which is firmly in the grip of the World Bank
and the Japanese government, follows what is enshrined in its
original mandate. The CGIAR should handover the 16 research centres
to the respective countries where these are located. This is what the
forefathers of the research system had said at the time of creating
the CGIAR, and they were so right.

Nothing can revitalise this dying horse. Not even Bill Gates with his
millions, unless of course the CGIAR is made to stand up for the
cause of the poor and marginalized farming communities #

(Devinder Sharma is a New Delhi-based food and trade policy analyst.
Responses can be emailed at: [log in to unmask])

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager