LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCHOOL-IT Archives


SCHOOL-IT Archives

SCHOOL-IT Archives


SCHOOL-IT@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCHOOL-IT Home

SCHOOL-IT Home

SCHOOL-IT  February 2004

SCHOOL-IT February 2004

Subject:

Re: FYI This is your brain on Data

From:

Vince Rossano <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

School Information Technology Discussion <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:02:48 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (237 lines)

Steve,

I'm glad you made the distinction in your subject line that the article's author does not: data, in itself,  is not necessarily information, i.e. it doesn't necessarily inform us of anything.  Some of it is totally useless, and more of it requires some astute analysis to turn it into actual information.   Our brains on data are quite different than our brains on information.   As I see it, this is one of the major roles of tech educators (as well as traditional school librarians): help kids to understand the difference and keep their sanity (or reasonable facsimile thereof).

Vince

Vince Rossano
Information Technology Director
Montpelier Public Schools
58 Barre Street
Montpelier, VT 05602

Voice: (802) 229-5355
Fax: (802) 223-6146
Email: [log in to unmask]

>>> [log in to unmask] 2/6/2004 3:21:47 PM >>>

  Reclaim your brain
  By Brian Wheeler
  BBC News Online Magazine

  More information has been produced and stored in the past five years,
than at any time in human history. E-mails, text messages, mobile phone
calls, TV, websites. We are drowning in the stuff. But how much of it
has added to the sum of human knowledge? And has anyone thought what it
is doing to our brains?

  Researchers from the University of California estimate that 800MB of
new information is produced and stored each year for every member of
the human race.

        What's in your 800MB?

         92% is information stored on magnetic media. The vast
        majority is held on computer hard drives as well as audio
        and video tapes

        7.75% is photographs and films

        0.03% is on paper, including books, newspapers and magazines
        - this has increased by 36% since 1999, largely due to people
        printing computer documents

        0.001% Optical storage media such as CDs and DVDs

  That is double the amount produced just three years ago - and is the
equivalent of two floppy disks per day for every man, woman and child
on the planet.

  This massive explosion in information has arguably empowered millions,
transforming them from passive consumers of culture into active
participants in a 24 hour global debate.

  But others claim that when the fog of new data has cleared we will be
left with very little in the way of new knowledge or understanding.

  "I think you are going to see more rapid production of further
information," says Keith Kendrick, head of neuroscience at the Babraham
Institute, Cambridge.

  I don't think creativity will disappear entirely, but it has become a
world of expertise
   Keith Kendrick
  "What you might not necessarily see is the answers to the really big
questions."

  In science, Professor Kendrick says, the vast amounts of information
researchers now have to wade through means they are focusing on
ever-smaller areas of expertise.

  As a result, there are fewer "big thinkers". It has become harder to
see the bigger picture, because it has simply become too big.

  And, he argues, if your ideas are constantly reviewed against everyone
else's, there is arguably less room for idiosyncratic and original
thinking.

  "I don't think creativity will disappear entirely, but it has become a
world of expertise in a more limited field.

  "The big thinkers who try to make sense of a whole area of science are
fairly rare."

  Commercial noise

  The marketing industry is often blamed for the increase in cultural
background noise and unwanted information.

  Opinion is divided as to how many commercial messages a person is
exposed in a single day. Recent research in the US said it could be as
many as 2,500.

  "We have absolutely no idea what this constant advertising babble is
doing to us," Kalle Lasn, founder of anti-commercial group Adbusters
has said.

  "The situation is similar to what we were experiencing at the start of
the environmental movement 40 years ago, when people just didn't want
to believe that three parts per billion of some chemical in the air or
water could be toxic and have all kinds of unforeseen consequences down
the road.

  "Today we are repeating that same mistake in our mental environment."

  Adbusters, which is best known for its sophisticated spoofs, such as
its Joe Chemo - a swipe at Camel cigarettes - campaigns against what it
calls the "corporate colonisation of the mind".

  It encourages "culture jamming", small acts of defiance against
encroaching commercialism, such as asking for the home phone number of
telesales callers or returning faxed or e-mailed ads to their senders.

  Valuable brain space

  The group also holds an annual Turn-off TV Week, although it claims a
15 second "uncommercial" for the event was rejected by most of the
country's television networks.

  Other groups, such as Commercial Alert, are campaigning for a ban on
selling naming rights to public spaces and the commercialisation of
health care, education and culture.

  But Professor Kendrick casts doubt on the idea that all the extra
information in the world is using up valuable brain space.

  Apart from anything else, the brain does not necessarily have a finite
capacity.

  "The potential for the brain to memorise is enormous. No one wants to
put a final limit on it," he says.

  The mind does not store information in a cold, clinical way like a
computer. Memory is strongly linked to emotion.

  So although we are bombarded with information all the time, we are
unlikely to remember much of it.

  The problem is not the amount of information you take in, but what
your brain does with it, Professor Kendrick says.

  "Trying to take in lots of information and organising it in such a way
that you can bring it back in the right way, at the right time, is
quite a problem.

  "We have got so much information now that you are likely to overload
your own personal capacity."

  'Emotional euphoria'

  People have had to learn how to cut through the "noise", selecting
what is relevant and what is not.

  "You have to be able to gloss over information extremely fast, instead
of dealing with everything in phenomenal detail."

  The effort that used to be involved in researching a subject,
Professor Kendrick argues, meant strong emotions were associated with
it, making it stick in the mind.

  "If you find it hard to get information it sticks. Before the internet
came along, just the achievement of finding out something was an
emotional euphoria all by itself."

  It's a sobering thought. But will you remember it tomorrow?

  Add your comments on this story, using the form below.

  There has been an enormous amount of information available for
centuries, increasing vastly in the last 150 years. Admittedly this has
not been in an electronic format but in the form of newsprint, books,
photographs, radio, TV. And up until now no one's brain has exploded as
we're well adapted to ignoring the huge amount of useless information
that we're surrounded by every day.
  John Cahill, UK

  I can just see it, 50 years from now, emblazoned across the sky in
mile high lettering (Arial, 50,000,000 pt) "Today's sunset was brought
to you by BIGCORP plc and the weather was controlled by WEATHERCORP inc
- we hope you tune in to EARTH.COM tomorrow for some pleasant afternoon
sunshine followed by a light shower". I've recently ditched my mobile
phone in an effort to 'get away' from information overload - I don't
want to be contactable 24x7 and I certainly DON'T want mobile spam.
  Simon Mills, UK

  The massive increase of information we have to process is a problem.
However the real damage is being done to children who are growing up
pre-programmed into certain brands and ideals. Their information
filters are not as sophisticated as adults. We live in a time where
everything has a dollar sign attached to it by ad-men and marketing
consultants. We now spend so much time processing adverts and thinking
what we want, we are forgetting others.
  Robin, UK

  How a brain that evolved on the plains of Africa copes with the
increasing sophistication of verbal and written perceptions of our
world has yet to be seen. Happiness indexes constantly show we are no
more happier than 50 years ago, so this data doesn't seem to be
improving our lives. We need to be taught how to filter this
information, using emotional tools to remember the stuff that really
matters, moral ways to live and the like, not what the recent 2 for 1
offer down the supermarket is.
  Ben, England

  Like stress, there is a good level information - that is, enough to
allow us to function proactively, make quick rational decisions, and
support a level of multi-tasking. Too much information is increasingly
detrimental to our effectiveness and a reactive or passive behaviour
results. I worry for my children who risk having their individuality
and creativity suppressed at an early age. I can still remember making
my own entertainment - for them a natural reaction to a lull in life
will be to turn-on whatever, log-in to something, switch into receive
mode!
  Chris,UK

  The point that "Memory is strongly linked to emotion" is interesting -
advertisers know this and this is exactly why they increasingly resort
to shock tactics. They're competing to shriek above their own racket
like noisy schoolchildren. What possible good does all-pervading
"ambient" advertising do for society? If I want information, I'll get
it myself, thanks.
  Ben, UK

  I think one of the most vital talents or skills a human being can have
in the modern world is being able to sift out what is important from
what is not from the sea of facts and figures we have before us. Can
this ability be taught? I think it can and that we should start
teaching it to kids now.
  Mick, UK

  Story from BBC NEWS:
  http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3230665.stm

  Published: 2003/11/03 15:00:58 GMT

   BBC MMIV

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager