LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  May 2004

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE May 2004

Subject:

MannGram®: Natl Geog plugs a new pesticide

From:

Robt Mann <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 4 May 2004 22:05:47 +1200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (101 lines)

Today's Headlines
ENN DAILY NEWS
http://www.enn.com/news/2004-05-04/s_22951.asp
EarthTalk: Are there any safe, nontoxic garden herbicides?

  - There are now several natural herbicides on the market.  One of the
most effective natural ingredients is corn gluten meal, a yellow powder
that is a waste product of the corn milling process.
   While the meal has been used in dog, fish, and other animal foods for
years, it has only recently been marketed as a natural herbicide. As
researchers at Iowa State University's (ISU) Horticulture Department
discovered, the material naturally inhibits the growth of seeds' initial
root systems, while doing no harm to already established plants.

   ISU researchers say that once vegetables or flowers have their first
true leaves, corn gluten meal can be safely and effectively applied to kill
weeds.  ISU scientists also note that, because corn gluten meal is high in
nitrogen, it is beneficial to surrounding plants, doubling as a fertilizer.

   It has been reported that corn gluten meal is particularly effective
against dandelions, pigweed, crabgrass, plantain, and curly dock. ISU
scientists suggest an application rate of 20 pounds per 1,000 square feet
and they say the product remains effective for five to six weeks.
Researchers say that corn gluten meal should be applied to lawns about
three to five weeks before weeds begin to grow.

   The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Pesticide
Programs urges people to decrease the amount of chemical herbicides used to
battle weeds.  There are already more than 865 active ingredients
registered for use in pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides.  About 350
pesticide products, including herbicides, are used on the foods we  eat and
to ward off pests from our homes and pets. But pesticides and herbicides
often contain toxic substances that are harmful to human and ecological
health.

   ChemFree+ is one brand of herbicide that uses corn gluten meal.
Available from Chem Free Lawns, it is advertised as both a natural weed
control and fertilizer for lawns and gardens and harmless to people, pets,
groundwater, insects, and soil microorganisms. Comparable products include
Dynaweed from the American Natural Products Company and "A-Maize-N" from
Planet Natural.

--------------

        < For those who judge a technology by its organisational origins
&/or control, and for those who predict from past misbehaviour of big
gangs, the USA maize-ethanol-gasohol-DDG etc industry, controlled by such
little-known big gangs as Archer Daniels Midland corp, any new 'OK'
byproduct should be viewed with scepticism.  I can predict many scientists,
let alone others, would feel it's a remote chance that corn gluten meal
would turn out to contain novel chemicals capable of poisoning e.g
predatory ladybirds that normally keep insect pests in check.  But that's
entirely plausible in view of the Showa Denko GM-bacilli.  One or more
maize GM-mutant might turn out to be toxic in some sense, if it were
properly examined; and the CGM from that mutant strain might contain most
or all of the toxin(s).
        I predicted the USA govt would dump on starving Africans the
millions-of tons stockpiles of USA GM-maize rejected by Europe where
GM-maize is not permitted for human consumption.  Refusal of some African
govts to accept these dumps has been one of the most heartening aspects of
the past half-decade.  Those govts, like Prince Charles, understand GMOs
far more than your typical media stooges or govts brainwashed by
gene-jiggering corps.
        Activism for conservation has a larger turnover than when I got
into it (before Greepneace), but is far less nimble  -  not on the balls of
its feet but rocked back on its heels or groping around in a fog of
ideology.  The work of Greenpeace NZ on toxic chemicals was shut down by a
lesbian/racist power-play, so that the firm has rarely been able to respond
in an informed way to new queries about chemical health hazards.
        Who will tell us about the testing of CGM?  How well tested was
CGM, in its role as a natural herbicide, before the glut of GM-maize?  What
chemical differences have been found in this or that GM-maize?  What
biological properties of the GM-CGM have been studied?
        I am suggesting that any attempt by ADM et al to add value of a
byproduct must be viewed with some awareness of the gangs in the particular
industry.  The most lavish offices I saw in DC 2 decade ago were those of
the gasohol industry, right handy on the foothills of Capitol Hill.
Extending petrol with ethanol is a reasonable way to increase
knock-resistance dubious process.  The resulting fuel, gasohol, containing
about 10% alcohol, is OK as a fuel; but there are other ways of boosting
knock-resistance (my favourite is water-injection), and it should be
clearly understood that energy farming as done by agribusiness absorbs more
energy (mostly as dieseline) than it produces in that fuel.  Energy farming
is an energy sink, not a net energy producer.
        If ethanol were produced as a byproduct of some valuable food, that
might be OK.  But to grow maize for the prime purpose of making ethanol is
a misconceived process.  So any value-added byproduct of this process
should be appraised carefully  -  it might help to make more profit, but we
should be wary of byproducts from misconceived industries. (The main
ethanol factory in NZ uses byproduct whey from the world's biggest casein
factory, which also features a 3MW biogas generator as the first stage of
the wastewater treatment.)

        OK class, that was today's routine item.  Now here's a more arcane
problem: why don't the oil/chemical complexes produce bulk ethanol?  Bulk
two-carbon compounds arise in petrochemical processing complexes, which
often adjoin refineries; is it really uneconomic to convert some to the
2-carbon alcohol?

R

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager