LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  August 2004

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE August 2004

Subject:

comments on 'Depleted Uranium: The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War'

From:

Robt Mann <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:02:38 +1200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (418 lines)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR407A.html

Depleted Uranium: The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War

by Leuren Moret

World Affairs - The Journal of International Issues, July 2004

www.globalresearch.ca    8 July 2004

>
>              Leuren Moret has worked at two US nuclear weapons
>laboratories as a geoscientist.  In
>              1991 she became a whistleblower at the Livermore nuclear
>weapons lab, and since then
>              has worked as an independent citizen scientist and radiation
>specialist in communities
>              around the world, and contributed to the UN subcommission
>investigating depleted uranium.
>              Her research on the environmental and public health effects
>of low level radiation from
>              atmospheric testing fallout, nuclear power plants, and
>depleted uranium weaponry, is
>              available on the internet and at http://www.mindfully.org .
>In 2003, she testified at
>              the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan held in
>Japan, and presented at the
>              World Depleted Uranium Weapons Conference in Hamburg,
>Germany, and at the World
>              Court of Women at the World Social Forum in Bombay, India in
>January 2004. She is
>              a Global Research Contributing Editor, a City of Berkeley
>Environmental Commissioner, and
>              the Past President of the Association for Women Geoscientists.
>
>              More on Mindfully.org by Leuren Moret

 >             The use of depleted uranium weaponry by the United States,
defying all international
              treaties, will slowly annihilate all species on earth
including the human species, and yet
              this country continues to do so with full knowledge of its
destructive potential.

                        < This keynote serves notice: no moderate or
uncertain conclusions are to be expected from this author.  Out-Caldicott
Caldicott, that's the task.
                < Most treaties have nothing to do with depleted uranium
(DU).  By saying all treaties are defied by DU weapons, Moret is letting us
know clearly that she will insist on hyperbole, as a main theme of this
article.
                < But that exaggeration is minor compared with the main
assertion: DUW will exterminate all life.   Not just the human sp, tho'
that is explicitly stipulated; all spp, including those known to be orders
of magnitude more radiation-resistant and much more rapidly mutating.
                < Moret is suggesting that the biological harm from USA DWU
is bound to be greater than not only all the nuclear explosions to date but
even the scale of nuclear war envisaged by those who conceived 'nuclear
winter'.  All those thousands of bombs are envisaged to decrease the human
population half a dozen orders of magnitude, but nobody has imagined
extermination of the human sp, let alone the cockroaches, fungi, benthic
algae, deep-smoker worms who will know little or nothing of this
catastrophe up on the surface, etc.

        < What may look like a scholarly jnl is printing blatant rubbish.


    ...

  >            The fact is that the United States and its military partners
have staged four nuclear wars, "slipping nukes under the wire" by using
dirty bombs and dirty weapons in countries the US needs to control.

        <  I object to this attempt to equate DUW to nuclear explosives.
The similarities are not great.
         < Also I object to this false statement that the USA 'needs to
control' any other countries.

...

 >             Described as the Trojan Horse of nuclear war, depleted
uranium is the weapon that keeps killing.  The half-life of Uranium-238 is
4.5 billion years, the age of the earth.  And, as Uranium-238 decays into
daughter radioactive products, in four steps before turning into lead, it
continues to release more radiation at each  step.  There is no way to turn
it off, and there is no way to clean it up.  It meets the US Government's
own  definition of Weapons of Mass Destruction.

              After forming microscopic and submicroscopic insoluble
Uranium oxide particles on the battlefield, they remain suspended in air
and travel around the earth as a radioactive component of atmospheric dust,
contaminating the environment, indiscriminately killing, maiming and
causing disease in all living things where  rain, snow and moisture remove
it from the atmosphere.  Global radioactive contamination from atmospheric
testing was the equivalent of 40,000 Hiroshima bombs, and still
contaminates the atmosphere and lower  orbital space today.  The amount of
low level radioactive pollution from depleted uranium released since 1991,
is many times more (deposited internally in the body), than was released
from atmospheric testing fallout.

        < Can this be true?  Who else has looked into it?  In view of the
global distribution of strontium-90 etc from explosions thru the
stratosphere , crossing the equator as had been previously thought barred
by the Hadley cells, this claim is on its face dubious.


   >           A 2003 independent report for the European Parliament by the
European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR), reports that based on
Chernobyl studies, low level radiation risk is 100 to 1000 times greater
than the  International Committee for Radiation Protection models estimate
which are based on the flawed Atomic and  Hydrogen Bomb Studies conducted
by the US Government.  Referring to the extreme killing effects of
radiation on biological systems, Dr. Rosalie Bertell, one of the 46
international radiation expert authors of the ECRR  report, describes it as:

                     >                   "The concept of species
annihilation means a relatively swift,
                                        deliberately induced end to
history, culture, science, biological
                                        reproduction and memory.  It is the
ultimate human rejection
                                        of the gift of life, an act which
requires a new word to
                                        describe it: omnicide."

        <  This, I'm sorry to say, is another of the Caldicott genre.  As I
recall, she's an ex-nun with some qualification in science but a record of
wild exaggeration about nuclear weapons.
        < I was a main critic (as v-p NZCND) of the NZ govt's cosying up to
the USA & other nuclear powers in the 1970s.  NZCND pres Richard Northey
(later MP) and I originated what became the NZ govt bipartisan policy and
law excluding vehicles known normally to carry nuclear weapons.  I yield to
none in opposition to nukes.  However, I believe the opposition will
succeed only if based on fact, not wild exaggerations beyond fact & reason.


   >           1943 MANHATTAN PROJECT BLUEPRINT FOR DEPLETED URANIUM

 >             In a declassified memo to General Leslie R. Groves, dated
October 30, 1943, three of the top physicists in the  Manhattan Project, Dr
James B Conant, A H Compton, and H C Urey, made their recommendation, as
members  of the Subcommittee of the S-1 Executive Committee, on the 'Use of
Radioactive Materials as a Military  Weapon':

   >                        "As a gas warfare instrument the material would
be ground into particles
                           of microscopic size to form dust and smoke and
distributed by a
                           ground-fired projectile, land vehicles, or
aerial bombs.  In this form it would
                           be inhaled by personnel. The amount necessary to
cause death to a person
                           inhaling the material is extremely small   There
are no known methods of
                           treatment for such a casualty   it will permeate
a standard gas mask filter in quantities                >large enough to be
extremely damaging."

 >             As a Terrain Contaminant:

   >                        "To be used in this manner, the radioactive
materials would be spread on
                           the ground either from the air or from the
ground if in enemy controlled
                           territory. In order to deny terrain to either
side except at the expense of
                           exposing personnel to harmful radiations   Areas
so contaminated by
                           radioactive material would be dangerous until
the slow natural decay of the
                           material took place   for average terrain no
decontaminating methods are
                           known. No effective protective clothing for
personnel seems possible of
                           development.   Reservoirs or wells would be
contaminated or food poisoned
                           with an effect similar to that resulting from
inhalation of dust or smoke."

 >             Internal Exposure:

 >                          "  Particles smaller than 1 [micron] are more
likely to be deposited in
                           the alveoli where they will either remain
indefinitely or be absorbed into
                           the lymphatics or blood.   could get into the
gastro-intestinal tract from
                           polluted water, or food, or air.   may be
absorbed from the lungs or G-I
                           tract into the blood and so distributed
throughout the body."

        < Suppose this is authentic 1943 material; can it really be the
best info today?  Nearly everything now known about such concepts has been
discovered since then.


   >           The pyrophoric nature of depleted uranium, which causes it
to begin to burn at very low  temperatures from friction in the gun barrel,
made it an ideal radioactive gas weapon then and now.

        < If that is so, how can a DU bullet or shell arrive at its target
in a fit state to penetrate it?  Ooutsiders like me have been well aware
that Pu is pyrophoric; it surprises me if U is also, as I'd have expected
to hear of it.


>Also it  was more available because the amount of depleted uranium
>produced was much greater than the amount of  fission products produced in
>1943.

        < This much is true.  It had to happen sometime.

 >             Britain had thoughts of using poisoned gas on Iraq long
before 1991:

                                        "I am strongly in favour of using
poisoned gas against
                                        uncivilized tribes. The moral
effect should be good... and it
                                        would spread a lively terror..."
(Winston Churchill commenting on
                                        the British use of poison gas
against the Iraqis after the First World War).

        < I'm afraid I won't accept, from Moret, that Winnie said this,
until I get a ref. so I can go & look it up.  Why is M privileged from
citing refs?  It is a v bad sign, denoting a certain arrogance.

  ...


>100 per cent of the depleted uranium in bombs and missiles is aerosolized
>upon impact and immediately released into the atmosphere. This amount can
>be as much as 1.5 tons in the large bombs. In bullets and cannon shells,
>the amount aerosolized is 40-70 per cent, leaving pieces and unexploded
>shells in the environment, to provide new sources of radioactive dust and
>contamination of the groundwater from dissolved depleted uranium metal
>long after the battles are over, as reported in a 2003 report by the UN
>Environmental Program on Yugoslavia. Considering that the US has admitted
>using 34 tons of depleted uranium from bullets and cannon shells in
>Yugoslavia, and the fact that 35,000 NATO bombing missions occurred there
>in 1999, potentially the amount of depleted uranium contaminating
>Yugoslavia and  transboundary drift into surrounding countries is
>staggering.

       ...

 >             Nearly 700,000 American Gulf War Veterans returned to the US
from a war that lasted just a few weeks.  Today more than 240,000 of those
soldiers are on permanent medical disability, and over 11,000 are dead.  In
a US Government study on post-Gulf War babies born to 251 veterans, 67 per
cent of the babies were reported to have serious illnesses or serious birth
defects. They were born without eyes, ears, had missing  organs, fused
fingers, thyroid or other malfunctions.  Depleted uranium in the semen of
the soldiers internally  contaminated their wives.  Severe birth defects
have been reported in babies born to contaminated civilians in  Iraq,
Yugoslavia, and Afghanistan and the incidence and severity of defects is
increasing over time.  Women in  Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq are
afraid now to have babies, and when they do give birth, instead of asking
if it is a girl or a boy, they ask 'is it normal?'.

        <Is a death rate of 11,000/700,000 over 13 y unusually high for
such a cohort of Yanks?  Moret begs this question.  She merely implies it
is high.
        < On the other hand the birth defect rate alleged is enormous.  (My
supposition would be that *several* causes would have to synergize to
produce such a huge rate of birth defects. )  If that is an accurate quote,
it doesn't constitute evidence that DU was 'the' cause.



  >            KNOWN ILLNESSES INFLICTED BY INTERNALIZATION OF DEPLETED
URANIUM PARTICLES

  >             Table 1: Compiled by Leuren Moret from Interviews with Gulf
War Vets and their families

                                  < this is a huge list of almost every
illness ever heard of.  It is of obscure significance.  I particularly like
the inclusion of 'Gulf War syndrome'.



                                                                   VISIE:

http://www.xs4all.nl/~stgvisie/VISIE/du-diagnosis.html

                                                                   DESERT
SHIELD/DESERT STORM
                                                                   website:

http://www.ushostnet.com/gulfwar/articles.htm
                                                                     04/1504


...

>              Soldiers who served in Bradley fighting vehicles, where it
>was common to sit on ammunition boxes where depleted uranium ammunition
>was stored, are now reporting that many have rectal cancer.

        < One advantage of this interesting hypothesis is that toxicity of
U could scarcely be involved; if the U had any effect, it was presumably
thru radiation.  The dose rate to those bums is easy to replicate &
measure.  What is it?  Does the claimed 'many' correspond with known
productivity of rectal cancer by external radiation?



   >           "DEPLETED URANIUM SCARE" - Claimed by President George W.
Bush on the official White House website:

                                        "During the Gulf War, coalition
forces used armor-piercing
                                        ammunition made from depleted
uranium, which is ideal for
                                        the purpose because of its great
density. In recent years,
                                        the Iraqi regime has made
substantial efforts to promote the
                                        false claim that the depleted
uranium rounds fired by
                                        coalition forces have caused
cancers and birth defects in
                                        Iraq. Iraq has distributed
horrifying pictures of children with
                                        birth defects and linked them to
depleted uranium. The
                                        campaign has two major propaganda
assets:"

                                        "Uranium is a name that has
frightening associations in the
                                        mind of the average person, which
makes the lie relatively
                                        easy to sell; and Iraq could take
advantage of an established
                                        international network of
antinuclear activists who had already
                                        launched their own campaign against
depleted uranium."

                                        "But scientists working for the
World Health Organization, the
                                        UN Environmental Programme, and the
European Union could
                                        find no health effects linked to
exposure to depleted
                                        uranium."

< Moret seems to imply that just because Dubya said it, it must be wrong.

...

>              In 1990, the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA)
>wrote a report warning about the potential health and environmental
>catastrophe from the use of depleted uranium weapons.  The health effects
>had been known for a long time.  The report sent to the UK government
>warned "in their estimation, if 50 tonnes of  residual DU dust remained
>'in the region' there could be half a million extra cancers by the end of
>the century [2000]."  Estimates of depleted uranium weapons used in 1991,
>now range from the Pentagon's admitted 325 tons, to other scientific
>bodies who put the figure as high as 900 tons.  That would make the number
>of estimated cancers as high as 9,000,000, depending on the amount used in
>the 1991 Gulf War. In the 2003 Gulf War, estimates of 2200 tons have been
>given - causing about 22,000,000 new cancer cases.  Altogether the total
>number of cancer patients estimated using the UKAEA data would be
>25,250,000. In July of 1998, the  CIA estimated the population of Iraq to
>be approximately 24,683,313.

        < It's all too easy to forget that cancer strikes about 1 in 3.
The idea that this will be trebled by DU to 1 in 1, i.e everybody, is hard
to believe.

         ...


>Clearly, this has been a genocidal plan from the start.

...

> More than ten times the amount of radiation, released during atmospheric
>testing, has been released from depleted  uranium weaponry since 1991.

        < This statement, buried in a caption of a dubious diagram (but
also asserted earlier, above), is open to testing by independent
calculation.  Who will do it?


> In 2002 the US government admitted that  every person living in the US
>between 1957 and 1963 was internally contaminated with radiation.

        < This is a classic of pseudo-scientific scaremongering.  The
statement itself is a platitude  -  every organism on the surface of the
Earth must have incorporated *some* fallout.  The question is *how much* ;
by now you may not be surprised at Moret's skipping this.
        < Having drafted scientific parts of the NZ govt's pleadings to the
World Court in our successful suit against the Fr govt over the fallout
imposed on us by their atmospheric tests, and having campaigned hard in CND
against those tests, including sending the Peace Flotilla in 1972-74, I
again yield to nobody in regard to the wrongfulness of low-level radiation
when those exposed have no choice and get zero benefit.  I just want
reasonable science, not loose raving.

        <The rest is mainly about The Carlyle Group.  It is of v dubious
relevance to the issue of DU.

        < This raver Moret does the cause little good by putting out such
rubbish.  She has had trips around the world, like Caldicott; but she
brings a most important cause into disrepute.


        It is extremely difficult to discern how important are the effects
of DU.  Formation of a scientific opinion is not assisted by Moret's raving.

R

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager