Middlebury will not be able to make the meeting on the 2nd.
From: Gary Snider [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Secretary Election Proposals
I have to agree with Colleen and Annette. As time goes on we have to be
willing to consider change. It is much better for us if we are part of the
solution than having someone else decide how we will deal with the issue at
Fortunately, I have a small town and I don't see same day registration as
being a problem for us. Motor voter however has taken up many hours of
time. I would imagine that the time saved on motor voter would more than
compensate for the extra time spent on same day registration, even in the
larger towns. State wide checklist should deter voter fraud, hopefully.
As far as changing the date of the primary, there needs to be more time
between when we get the ballots from the printers and the General Election.
There just isn't enough time to get the early ballots out to those in our
armed forces and get them back to us. The only way to give more time is to
have the primary earlier in the year. Just as a thought, having it in May
or June might be better than early or mid August as it would make it easier
for those clerks who plan on attending Salve each August.
Sorry, I will not be able to make the meeting on the 2nd in Barre but
thought I would just give you my two cents.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colleen T Haag" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: Secretary Election Proposals
> I fully agree with you and your statements. Our society has changed
> dramatically in the last 10 years and we have to change with it. I'd
> like to think that people would be informed about their voting rights at
> all times but this is no longer the case.
> I had a full time person for the affidavit process in the November
> election. So if we had same day voter registration it would be no more
> and probably less work for me and my staff. And we all know that motor
> voter isn't working.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nora Wilson
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:22 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Secretary Election Proposals
> Annette, I agree with you - I think it will work and I do dislike the
> Motor Voter Reports and all the carbon signatures and the no oath
> registrations. Thanks for you input. Nora
> Annette Cappy Town Clerk wrote:
>>As a clerk in a large town for several years who has been through many
>>elections I'd like to give some thoughts about some of the election
>>While I understand concerns over the proposals, and agree
>>with your philosophies of teaching democracy and civic duty in schools,
>>lot of what we would like to see will only happen in a perfect world.
> In a
>>perfect world everyone would register as soon as they were old enough,
>>forget to tell us when they move, and never miss voting in any
> election. We
>>know that will never happen!
>>RE: same day voter registration
>>The reality is (and we all see it every day) that people often really
>>think ahead about voting and all of a sudden here it is, election day
>>they aren't registered! We forget that while we've been living and
>>breathing elections for many months leading up to the "Big Day", others
>>(besides our families that have had to listen to us gripe and the
>>candidates) most others haven't.
>>With technology making life seem like just one click away, I am afraid
>>if we don't keep up the pace and modernize the way we do things, we'll
>>future generations except for a few serious die-hards. I do think that
>>can make life simpler for voters and still protect the integrity of
>>elections but we all need to work together.
>>Brattleboro is a border state with New Hampshire who already has same
>>voter registration. Local people here listen to NH radio stations,
> read NH
>>newspapers and watch NH TV. All of which promote same day
>>Many that I turned away on 11/2 were under the impression that they
>>register on election day.
>>To be honest, if I wasn't familiar with the system, didn't lead a
>>life and I had to struggle every day just to get by, would I remember
>>notify the town clerk when I moved to the next town over? Lives are
>>more transient than they were 50 years ago.
>>I do agree that same day registration will mean lots of work but it
> will be
>>positive work rather than the negative work we are currently doing with
>>registrants......and if I were to total up all the staff hours we have
>>invested in maintaining our checklist according to DMV reports over
>>course of a year that have proven to be inaccurate, I'd take same day
>>This would be a huge change for us but I believe that with a plan in
>>a statewide checklist and carefully thought out legislation, we can
> make it
>>work so everyone comes out a winner and citizens feel like they are
>>If we had gone to same day voter registration a few years ago we would
>>have had to deal with "motor voter".
>>RE: Self-Administering Oath
>>I am also on the "other side" about this topic. I personally like the
>>and don't care to see it abolished but I am strongly in favor of having
>>I have received too many voter registration applications that have
>>to be sent back because no one had administered the oath. It is an
>>especially cumbersome process for overseas and military voters
>>the slowness of the postal system in foreign countries.
>>Voters might actually read it and digest it more thoroughly than they
>>currently do having it read aloud to them.....and no more "Needs Oath"
>>voters to deal with on election day. We currently have approx. 150-200
>>so on our list.
>>I hope this isn't too lengthy and I hope I haven't come across as too
>>preachy. I only mean to share my thoughts for what I believe can be a
>>better way of doing business.
>>Annette L. Cappy, Town Clerk
>>230 Main St., Suite 108
>>Brattleboro, VT 05301-2885
>>phone 802-254-4541 x 129
>>email [log in to unmask]