LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  January 2005

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE January 2005

Subject:

Richard Levins versus the SWP

From:

Louis Proyect <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:57:03 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (127 lines)

I discovered that the new issue of the ISR, the theoretical journal of the
batty sect-cult that I used to belong to in a previous lifetime, has an
exchange between Richard (is he still here?) and Steve Clark, a long-time
hack who has written some truly bizarre articles on the environment written
falsely in the name of Marxism:

 >>"Capitalism, Labor, and the Transformation of Nature," an exchange
between Richard Levins and Steve Clark, is the final item in this issue.
Following publication of the articles by Clark in the Militant, Levins,
professor of population sciences and a researcher at the Harvard School of
Public Health, wrote a response.

Levins is active in the July 26 Coalition, a Boston-area Cuba solidarity
organization, and works with the Institute of Ecology and Systematics of
the Cuban Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment. Levins's
article is published here for the first time, followed by Clark's reply and
final comments by each author.<<

I am somewhat surprised that Richard would waste his time with these
lunatics who have no influence anywhere. Well, who am I to speak since I
answered Clark myself a while back on the Marxism list:

STEVE CLARK (Third of four parts in the Militant newspaper on farming,
science and ecology): Despite the near-hysterical pitch of the campaigns
against "genetic pollution," there is not a single documented case of a
human being anywhere in the world being harmed by food or medicine produced
in this way. Nor is there a single example of dreaded armies of
"superweeds" vanquishing fields and wetlands. By their very origins, in
fact, genetically modified plants are very dependent on human care and
cultivation; on their own, they are poorly adapted to nature "red in tooth
and claw."

The nostrums advanced by various bourgeois and middle class proponents of
"organic" agriculture are not neutral in their effects on the conditions
and prospects for liberation of working people, either those in the
oppressed nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America or those in the
imperialist countries.

COMMENT: Not surprisingly, what Clark fails to address is the context in
which genetic modified seeds are being introduced. They are fixes to a
system that Marx identified as riddled with internal contradictions over
150 years ago. The introduction of chemical fertilizers, pesticides,
monocrop cultivation--in a word, all of the staples of capitalist
farming--involve ecological overhead that leads to the undermining of the
ability of society to reproduce itself.

Obviously agribusiness is totally behind the introduction of GM. Why a
working-class newspaper would want to shill for the Monsantos of the world
is another question entirely.

In the underdeveloped countries, where small farms supply most of the food
needs for the local market, GM is much more likely to have destructive
consequences. In a report for Food First, Peter Rosset comented:

"In order to survive under such circumstances, and to improve their
standard of living, they [small farmers] must be able to tailor
agricultural technologies to their variable but unique circumstances, in
terms of local climate, topography, soils, biodiversity, cropping systems,
market insertion, resources, etc. For this reason such farmers have over
millennia evolved complex farming and livelihood systems which balance
risks -- of drought, of market failure, of pests, etc. -- with factors such
as labor needs versus availability, investment needed, nutritional needs,
seasonal variability, etc. Typically their cropping systems involve
multiple annual and perennial crops, animals, fodder, even fish, and a
variety of foraged wild products. Under such highly varied circumstances,
uniform varieties, such as those put forth under the green revolution, or
newer GE or 'transgenic' crop varieties, are unlikely to be widely adopted
or found useful by many such farmers.

"When GE crop varieties, carrying the Bt insecticide gene, for example, are
'forced' into such cropping systems, the risks are much greater than in
large, wealthy farmer systems, or farming systems in Northern countries.
For example, in the Third World there will typically be more sexually
compatible wild relatives of crops present, making pollen transfer to weed
populations of insecticidal properties, virus resistance, and other
genetically engineered traits more likely, with possible food chain and
super-weed consequences. Such farmers are unlikely to plant refuges, making
resistance evolution by insects more likely. Horizontal transfer of genetic
material is also highly risky in such circumstances. The associated risks
of super-weeds and new pathogen strains, among others, are likely to put
the poor in a more precarious position."

Obviously one can't expect a hack writer for the Militant to be as familiar
with such issues as Peter Rosset, who is an agroecologist and rural
development specialist with a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan. But
that should not inhibit somebody who is speaking on behalf of the
revolutionary proletariat. When you have such heavy responsibilities, who
can be bothered with wasting time on deep research.

CLARK: Major environmentalist organizations, for example, waged a
successful effort against the unquestionably toxic pesticide DDT, resulting
in a welcome halt to its use throughout the imperialist world.

No comparable energy or resources, however, are now being devoted to
campaigning against various imperialist governments and agencies that are
refusing to fund the use of DDT in some 25 semicolonial countries
where--applied in relatively small quantities--it is the most effective way
to control mosquitoes that spread malaria. That disease kills more than 1
million people annually worldwide, most of them children, and recurs for a
lifetime in those who are "cured."

COMMENT: This "analysis" from a Marxist publication is noteworthy for its
failure to analyze why diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, etc. are on
the rise in 3rd world countries. Malaria is not a function of hot weather.
It is a function of poverty. There are alternatives to DDT, including
bednets soaked in insecticide, use of lower-risk pesticides, elimination of
mosquito breeding grounds and the introduction of natural predators
including mosquito-eating fish. Obviously Clark is as interested in the
environmental consequences of DDT in the third world as he is in that of GM
seed. But most scientists free of industry ties agree that chlorine-based
pesticides are linked to birth defects, cancer and other diseases. The
answer obviously is to spend the money necessary to kill malarial
mosquitoes using safe methods, but the corrupt gangs typically running 3rd
world countries lack the political will to put imperialism on the spot.
After all, it was imperialism that caused the poverty that makes malaria an
epidemic. Thabo Mbeki's response is typical. He called for the
re-introduction of DDT at the same time he recommended quack medicine
against AIDS. A revolutionary approach would be to demand the elimination
of predatory capitalist "development" in the 3rd world and all the
despoliation that goes along with it. However, one would not expect that
from a "Marxist" newspaper, would one. They are much more comfortable
joining hands with the public relations department of outfits like Monsanto.

--

www.marxmail.org

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager