LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  June 2005

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE June 2005

Subject:

SPACE WEAPONS ARE REALLY A TERRIBLE IDEA

From:

Carmelo Ruiz <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:28:37 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (168 lines)

--- Karl Grossman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005
> Subject: SPACE WEAPONS ARE REALLY A TERRIBLE IDEA
>
> JUNE 29, 2005
> Minute Man Media
>
> SPACE WEAPONS ARE REALLY A TERRIBLE IDEA
> By Karl Grossman
>
> The White House is expected in coming weeks to
> declare space a new arena of
> war. It is anticipated that the Bush administration
> will give the go-ahead
> to long-developing strategy to -­ as U.S. military
> plans explicitly state
> ­- “control” the “ultimate high ground” of space and
> from it “dominate” the
> planet below.
>
> Indeed, after expending billions of dollars in
> preparation -­ especially
> for the Star Wars program of the Reagan era -- the
> United States has the
> technology to move into space with weapons. But that
> the United States will
> end up as the only nation up there is a huge
> miscalculation.
>
> A tragic mistake is in the making that will lead to
> an arms race in space
> and no nation having any advantage. The United
> States can be first to
> deploy weapons in space, but then, in response,
> China and Russia -­ and who
> knows what other nation next -- will be up there,
> too.
>
> Vast amounts of financial resources will have to be
> expended by the
> citizens of all these countries -­ money desperately
> needed for medical
> care, education, the environment and all the other
> great wants on Earth.
> And, it will divert resources from the war on
> terrorism.
>
> Just a few decades ago, the United States joined
> with the United Kingdom
> and the Soviet Union to prevent the weaponization of
> space. The three
> nations put together a visionary document: the Outer
> Space Treaty, enacted
> in 1967 and now ratified by most of the nations on
> Earth.
>
> “Inspired by the great prospects opening up before
> mankind” as a result of
> the “entry into outer space, recognizing the common
> interest of all mankind
> in the progress of the exploration and use of space
> for peaceful purposes,”
> it prohibits the placement of “nuclear weapons or
> any other kinds of
> weapons of mass destruction” in space.
>
> In recent years, our neighbor, Canada, has led -­
> along with Russia and
> China -­ efforts to broaden the treaty and ban all
> weapons in space.
>
> The United States has opposed this and would now
> break the Outer Space
> Treaty by deploying weapons of mass destruction. One
> U.S. program,
> nicknamed “Rods From God,” would hurl cylinders of
> tungsten, titanium or
> uranium at targets on Earth each striking with the
> force of a “small”
> nuclear weapon. That’s a weapon of mass destruction.
>
> And to other nations responding and meeting us in
> kind in space, a high
> U.S. diplomat told me as he prepared to vote at the
> United Nations against
> a resolution barring all space weapons, U.S.
> military analyses have
> determined China is “30 years behind” in competing
> with the U.S. militarily
> in space, and Russia “doesn’t have the money.” I
> recounted travels in
> China, observing its technological strength, noted
> its space prowess, and
> pointed to the enormous space capabilities of
> Russia. A big error is being
> made, I said. He disagreed.
>
> In recent weeks, there have been declarations that
> China and Russia would
> counter with force if the United States moves to
> weaponize space. If “we
> find ourselves in a situation where we need to
> react, of course we will do
> it,” said a Russian official.
>
> Moreover, consider if space is armed and there is a
> shooting war with laser
> weapons and hypervelocity guns and particle beams (a
> preferred energy
> source: on-board nuclear power) and other weapons
> exchanging fire. There
> would be so much debris left orbiting at high speed
> above the planet that
> humanity would be precluded for millennia from again
> getting up and out and
> exploring space. As Edgar Mitchell, a former
> astronaut who walked on the
> moon, has said: “Getting out to deep space would be
> like swimming in a
> piranha-full river or running through a hail of
> bullets.”
>
> Bruce Gagnon, coordinator of the Global Network
> Against Weapons & Nuclear
> Power in Space, says the proposed new Bush National
> Space Policy Directive
> must be “met with a resounding chorus that says we
> will not allow this plan
> for space warfare to go forward.”
>
> People must demand warfare not be allowed to extend
> to the heavens.
>
> --
>
> Karl Grossman, professor of journalism at the State
> University of New
> York/College at Old Westbury, is author of “Weapons
> In Space” (Seven
> Stories Press) and host of the television
> documentary “Star Wars Returns”
> (EnviroVideo). A photo of Karl Grossman is available
>
>
<http://www.opedresource.com/AUTHORS%20PHOTOS.htm>CLICK
> HERE
>
>


=========================================

Carmelo Ruiz-Marrero
Director, Proyecto de Bioseguridad http://www.bioseguridad.blogspot.com
Research Associate, Institute for Social Ecology http://www.social-ecology.org/
Senior Fellow, Environmental Leadership Program http://www.elpnet.org/

http://carmeloruiz.blogspot.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/carmeloruiz/



__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager