LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  June 2005

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE June 2005

Subject:

Re: Science & denial

From:

Louis Proyect <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:16:52 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (101 lines)

>Here's an article that surveys the available archeological evidence and
>critiques the claim that warfare has always been part of human society:
>
>R. Brian Ferguson, "The Birth of War," Natural History, July/August 2003,
>available online at http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/0703/0703_feature.html.
>
>The problem is that any science that contradicts contemporary social
>values is, ipso facto, controversial,so while it may be good science, it
>won't be "unarguably good science" until the values change.
>
>Ferguson replies to his critics here:
>http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1134/is_8_112/ai_108551806.
>
>--PG

http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/fascism_and_war/ehrenreich.htm
Barbara Ehrenreich on war

I guess I have gotten used to how bad the Nation magazine has become, but
every once in a while I run into something so rancid that I have to pause
and catch my breath. This was the case with a review by DSA leader Barbara
Ehrenreich of 3 books on war. This review was accompanied by a review by
Susan Faludi of Ehrenreich's new book on war titled "Blood Rites". All this
prose is dedicated to the proposition that large-scale killing has been
around as long as homo sapiens has been around and that it has nothing much
to do with economic motives. Looking for an explanation why George Bush
made war on Iraq? It wasn't over oil, "democratic socialist" Ehrenreich
would argue. It was instead related to the fact that we were once "preyed
upon by animals that were initially far more skillful hunters than
ourselves. In particular, the sacralization of war is not the project of a
self-confident predator...but that of a creature which has learned only
'recently,' in the last thousand or so generations, not to cower at every
sound in the night."

In a rather silly exercise in cultural criticism, Ehrenreich speculates
that the popularity of those nature shows depicting one animal attacking
and eating another are proof of the predatory disposition we brutish human
beings share. I myself have a different interpretation for what its worth.
I believe that PBS sponsors all this stuff because of the rampant oil
company sponsorship that transmits coded Social Darwinist ideology. Just as
the leopard is meant to eat the antelope, so is Shell Oil meant to kill
Nigerians who stand in the way of progress.

One of the books that Ehrenreich reviews is "War Before Civilization: The
Myth of the Peaceful Savage" by Lawrence Keeley. Keeley argues that
material scarcity does not explain warfare among Stone Age people. It is
instead something in our "shared psychology" that attracts us to war.
Keeley finds brutish behavior everywhere and at all times, including among
the American Indian. If the number of casualties produced by wars among the
Plains Indians was proportional to the population of European nations
during the World Wars, then the casualty rates would have been more like 2
billion rather than the tens of millions that obtained. Ehrenreich swoons
over Keeley's book that was published in 1996 to what seems like
"insufficient acclaim".

I suspect that Keeley's book functions ideologically like some of the
recent scholarship that attempts to show that Incas, Aztecs and Spaniards
were all equally bad. They all had kingdoms. They all had slaves. They all
despoiled the environment. Ad nauseum. It is always a specious practice to
project into precapitalist societies the sort of dynamic that occurs under
capitalism. For one thing, it is almost impossible to understand these
societies without violating some sort of Heisenberg law of anthropology.
The historiography of the North American and Latin American Indian
societies is mediated by the interaction of the invading society with the
invaded. The "view" is rarely impartial. Capitalism began to influence and
overturn precapitalist class relations hundreds of years ago, so a
laboratory presentation of what Aztec society looked like prior to the
Conquistadores is impossible. Furthermore, it is regrettable that
Ehrenreich herself is seduced by this methodology since she doesn't even
question Keeley's claims about the Plains Indian wars. When did these wars
occur? Obviously long after the railroads and buffalo hunters had become a
fact of North American life.

The reason all this stuff seems so poisonous is that it makes a political
statement that war can not be eliminated through the introduction of
socialism or political action. For Ehrenreich, opposing war is a
psychological project rather than a political project:

"Any anti-war movement that targets only the human agents of war -- a
warrior elite or, on our own time, the chieftains of the
'military-industrial complex' - risks mimicking those it seeks to overcome
... So it is a giant step from hating the warriors to hating the war, and
an even greater step to deciding that the 'enemy' is the abstract
institution of war, which maintains its grip on us even in the interludes
we know as peace."

Really? The abstract institution of war maintains its grip on "us"? Who
exactly is this "us"? Is it the average working person who struggles to
make ends meet? Do they sit at home at night like great cats fantasizing
about biting the throats out of Rwandans or Zaireans in order to feast on
their innards? The NY Times has been reporting more and more concern among
Clinton administration officials about Kabila's drive toward the overthrow
of Mobutu, our erstwhile puppet. It is not out of the question that Clinton
and his European allies would put together an expeditionary force to
protect "democracy" in Africa. Who would be responsible for this war? The
ruling class or the poor foot soldiers who get drummed into action?

--

www.marxmail.org

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager