Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:02:48 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Great.
Quoting "Costello, Stephen" <[log in to unmask]>:
> They are doing a story for tomorrow, I hear.
>
> Steve Costello
> 747-5427
> CVPS Cow Power - Providing renewable energy one cow at a time. To
> enroll, call 1-800-649-2877.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vermont Birds [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gregory R.
> Askew
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:40 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [VTBIRD] more ? on W. Crane
>
> I believe that the poster was making a joke as the bird was wandering to
> points
> at the same exact latitude as the summering grounds, so I take it that
> Wyoming
> must be in line with Wisconsin, Southern Ontario, and Vermont. Perhaps?
> As for capture, I think they might want to see if she'll make her way
> back on
> her own. Definitely fascinating. I'm surprised the Free Press hasn't run
> a
> special interest piece on the bird as well as the project. Perhaps Ian
> et al
> wanted to keep it quiet so the bird isn't harassed or worse.
> Greg
>
> Quoting C and R STEWART <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> > Greg,
> >
> > Thanks for posting web page for WOCR history. Fascinating reading.
> >
> > I found it curious that the team (as of june 15) had written
> "rather
> > than attempt to capture her where she is, the Tracking Team plans to
> set up
> > a pen in Wyoming." I don't understand this comment. I assume
> someone
> > out there (Ian, Ron?) is in daily contact with the Team. Could you
> > forward this for an explanation? What is the reason not to capture
> and
> > why WY and not WI, which is where the other birds are?
> >
> > Ruth
> >
> >
> >
> > Charlie & Ruth Stewart
> > E. Dorset, Vermont
> > U.S.A.
> >
>
>
> --
>
--
|
|
|