LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VTBIRD Archives


VTBIRD Archives

VTBIRD Archives


VTBIRD@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VTBIRD Home

VTBIRD Home

VTBIRD  July 2005

VTBIRD July 2005

Subject:

Ivory-billed Sightings Questioned

From:

"BUTLER, Bridget" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Vermont Birds <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:57:22 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (162 lines)

This from today's new York Times :

NY TIMES: Vanished/Sighted Woodpecker Controversy
3 Biologists Question Evidence in Sighting of Rare Woodpecker

By ANDREW C. REVKIN

Published: July 21, 2005

Three biologists are questioning the evidence used by a team of bird
experts who made the electrifying claim in April that they had
sighted
an ivory-billed woodpecker, a bird presumed to have vanished from the
United States more than 60 years ago, in the swampy forests of
southeast Arkansas.

The paper questioning the discovery has been provisionally accepted
by
a peer-reviewed journal, which could post the analysis online within
a
few weeks. But the paper will be accompanied by a fierce rebuttal by
the team that announced the discovery, and a response to that
rebuttal
by the challengers.

The expected publication of the paper and the rebuttal was confirmed
in
interviews and e-mail exchanges with two authors of the challenge,
Richard O. Prum and Mark B. Robbins, ornithologists at Yale and the
University of Kansas, as well as with two members of the team that
reported finding the woodpecker.

The third author of the new paper is Jerome A. Jackson, a zoologist
at
Florida Gulf Coast University and the author of the book, "In Search
of
the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker," published in 2004.

"In my opinion," Mr. Jackson wrote in an e-mail message on Wednesday,
"the data presented thus far do no more than suggest the possibility
of
the presence of an ivory-billed woodpecker. I am most certainly not
saying that ivory-billed woodpeckers are not out there. I truly hope
that the birds do exist in Arkansas or elsewhere and have been
championing this idea for a long time."

Both groups of scientists declined to name the journal or to discuss
the details of the challenge and the response until they were
published.

But they made it clear that the debate revolves around four seconds
of
fuzzy videotape that, by chance, captured a bird with sweeping
white-and-black wings as it darted from its perch on the far side of
a
tupelo tree in April 2004 and flicked over swampy waters before
vanishing in the trees 11 wing beats later.

That video clip was just one piece in a pile of drawings, recordings
and other evidence collected in more than a year of searching and
deploying cameras and listening devices across the vast swampy
reaches
of the Cache River National Wildlife Refuge.

Altogether, the original research team, led by scientists from
Cornell
University and the Nature Conservancy, compiled seven sightings,
including the video, as well as recordings of a "double knock" sound
typical of the ivory-billed bird.

But only the video was potentially solid enough to confirm for the
wider ornithological community the existence of the bird, the authors
said in various statements at the time.

Everyone agrees that the bird that appears on the tape is either an
ivory-billed woodpecker or a pileated woodpecker, a slightly smaller
bird that is relatively common. Both species have a mix of white and
black plumage. However, the ivory-billed woodpecker has a white
trailing edge to its wings while the pileated woodpecker has a black
trailing edge.

The team that conducted the original search for the bird ran
extensive
tests, including recreating the scene captured in video using
flapping,
hand-held models of the two types of woodpecker. They concluded that
the plumage patterns seen in the grainy image could only be that of
the
ivory-billed woodpecker. The authors of the new paper disagree.

Only extended scientific discussion - or new pictures of the bird
from
additional searches - will determine whose view will prevail. Another
intensive scientific search of the region is scheduled to begin in
November, Cornell officials said.

"The people who originally announced this thoroughly believe they got
an ivory-billed woodpecker," Dr. Robbins said in an interview.
Determining if a species has crossed the threshold of extinction
often
requires decades of observation to ensure that no stray individuals
have found a reclusive hideaway.

Supposedly extinct species have been rediscovered with some frequency
over the last century. One famed example is the coelacanth, a huge
fish
known only from fossils for generations but then caught by African
anglers.

In the case of the ivory-billed woodpecker, a magnificent bird with a
30-inch wingspan and a red crest, determining that it has not become
extinct has proved equally daunting. Individual birds were widely
dispersed, and the woodpecker shared habits and habitat with the
pileated woodpecker.

Van Remsen of Louisiana State University, an expert on the woodpecker
and a member of the team that reported finding the ivory-billed
species, said he remained confident of the discovery.

"We can counter everything," he said. "We stick to our guns."

The announcement of the bird's apparent discovery came on April 28,
when the scientists' findings were published in the online version of
the journal Science.

The announcement thrilled conservationists, who saw the bird as the
perfect symbol around which to build an invigorated protection plan
for
woodland habitat in the Southeast, which harbors a rich array of
wildlife and plants.

The Bush administration used the reported sightings in Arkansas to
promote its "cooperative conservation" philosophy. The day the
rediscovery was publicized, the administration announced a variety of
initiatives, including a plan to pay more than $13 million to
landowners within the region's floodplains who plant and maintain
forests.

John W. Fitzpatrick, the co-leader of the search for the bird and
director of the Cornell University Laboratory of Ornithology, said it
was normal for scientists to disagree about evidence of this sort,
especially because in this case the video in question was "pretty
crummy." But he said that extensive analysis was done and redone to
eliminate
the possibility that the bird was a pileated woodpecker.

Dr. Fitzpatrick added that there was "significant additional evidence
right now" that would be published in coming months. He declined to
comment on the challengers' assertions, saying any discussion could
jeopardize publication of the exchange of papers on
the video.


Enjoy!

Bridget Butler
Teacher/Naturalist
Audubon Vermont
www.vt.audubon.org

"In the child there is no separation between spirit, soul & body. Everything is reproduced in this inner being. He imitates his whole environment." - Rudolf Steiner

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager