LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for UVMFLOWNET Archives


UVMFLOWNET Archives

UVMFLOWNET Archives


UVMFLOWNET@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

UVMFLOWNET Home

UVMFLOWNET Home

UVMFLOWNET  October 2005

UVMFLOWNET October 2005

Subject:

Re: Carotid Stent Follow up

From:

Bill Schroedter <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

UVM Flownet <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:51:03 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (127 lines)

As if this weren't all complicated enough! One more interesting thing that
is emerging in the literature with the new generation(s) of drug-eluting
stents may work too well, that is they may prevent the formation of any
neointimal lining. I have seen a few isolated reports of stents more than a
year out that are completely void of any intimal, ie: still bare metal
inside the artery. This would seem problematic to me......... I agree with
Jean - we clearly do not know much about this - perhaps we simply need to be
smarter! 

Bill Schroedter
Venice, Fl 


-----Original Message-----
From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jean
Primozich
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Carotid Stent Follow up

Gail,
Because we do not yet know the natural history of carotid stents, and 
because I believe that there is much to learn about what happens to these 
arteries after they are stented,  I think that follow up should be done more

often than with carotid endarterectomy; perhaps every 3 months, until we 
have some hard data to show that the vessels respond in the same manner as 
we espect after endartectomy.
The first follow up post op study should be within one month after the 
procedure and bilateral, so as to see if the contralateral side has changed 
(decrease flow) due to the elimination of the stenosis on the procedure 
side. (Just like with carotid endarterectomy). This should serve as a 
baseline scan, at least for the stented artery, and all other follow up 
studies should be compared to this study. Since we do not know what the 
normal velocity is within a stent or whether it is elevated for reasons not 
yet defined, we must keep in mind that this is not a "normal" vessel any 
longer. It has scaffolding, i.e. the stent, making the walls potentially 
stiffer and it has basically created a theoretical uniform flow channel 
without a bulb. It has also been ballooned (perhaps more than once) and has 
a metal structure against the walls potentially causing prolonged 
inflammation and therefore potential restenosis. We just don't know the 
answers yet. Which is why why we have to be very careful about using 
criteria that we use for native unstented arteries and criteria that was not

validated according to the NASCET method, that is using the distal ICA as 
reference. The old criteria that used the bulb as the reference, probably 
should not be used with any confidence for any studies (stented or not) that

we do these days, since all of the angiograms are now being standardly read 
using the distal ICA as reference.
I have included two references for criteria that I think look pretty good, 
although bear in mind, these are small studies and have not been tested 
prospectively or reproduced in other centers. But, nonetheless, the 
velocities look like what I might think would be legitimate 
(hemodynamically) in a stented vessels. I would be willing to discuss this 
in more detail if you would like, perhaps on the phone. Give me a call (206)

685-3225.
References:
Stanziale, SF, et al. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by 
duplex ultrasound. J Endovasc Ther. Jun; 12(3), 2005.
Lai BK, Hobson RW, Goldstein J, et al. Carotid artery stenting:is there a 
need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?. J Vasc Surg, 2004;39.

Hope this helps,
Jean Primozich
University of Washington




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anna Marie Kupinski" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:59 AM
Subject: Re: Carotid Stent Follow up


> Hi Gail,
>
> We usually scan them prior to discharge or at the first post-procedure
> office visit.  Then usually every 6 months.  The only criteria we have
> is what we currently use for the native carotid vessels. However, our
> velocities tend to be higher so our lower cut off was raised from 125 to
> 150 cm/s.
>
> Ann Marie
>
> Ann Marie Kupinski, PhD RVT
> Technical Director, Karmody Vascular Laboratory
> The Vascular Group, PLLC
> Albany, NY 12208
> phone:518-262-5050
> fax:518-262-6686
>
>>>> [log in to unmask] 10/11/2005 7:47:52 PM >>>
>
> Need some help.  Can someone tell me what the usually carotid stent
> surveillance protocol is and what criterias are being used -- Bandyk?
> Jeannie, Anne Marie...  Thanks
>
>
> Gail P. Size, BS, RVT, RVS, RCVT
> Educational Coordinator
> www.VASCULAR-WEB.COM
> A Resource for Vascular Professionals
> Western Office
> 13303 S. Desert Dawn Dr.
> Pearce, AZ  856252
> Phone 520-642-1303 Fax 520-642-1304
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
>
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
> 

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager