LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for BLOGGING Archives


BLOGGING Archives

BLOGGING Archives


BLOGGING@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BLOGGING Home

BLOGGING Home

BLOGGING  November 2005

BLOGGING November 2005

Subject:

Mystery of Gossipy Blog on the Judiciary Is Solved

From:

Steve Cavrak <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

UVM Blogging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:09:12 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (88 lines)

Mystery of Gossipy Blog on the Judiciary Is Solved
By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: November 16, 2005

Alex Kozinski, a federal appeals court judge in California, was a  
little miffed last year when a blog called Underneath Their Robes, a  
dishy hybrid of People magazine and The Harvard Law Review, failed to  
list him as a candidate for "male superhottie of the federal judiciary."

So he nominated himself ("discerning females and gay men find  
graying, pudgy middle-aged men with an accent close to Gov.  
Schwarzenegger's almost totally irresistible"), and he won.

Yesterday, Judge Kozinski was mourning what was apparently the death  
of the blog. Soon after The New Yorker magazine disclosed on Monday  
that its author was not, as the blog claimed, a female lawyer at a  
big firm with a taste for gossip and luxury goods, but rather a male  
federal prosecutor in Newark, the site disappeared behind a password- 
protected virtual wall.

Judges and their law clerks made up much of the site's readership,  
and several said yesterday that they had found its mixture of  
judicial celebrity sightings and over-the-top commentary irresistible.

In one of its last posts, the blog defended its judicial beauty  
contests with a play on the Latin phrase for "the thing speaks for  
itself."

"Have you seen Judge Kimba Wood and Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw?" the  
blog asked. "Babes ipsa loquitur!!!"

The blog's author was until recently known only as Article III  
Groupie, after the part of the Constitution concerning the judiciary.  
A year ago, another fan, Richard A. Posner, a federal appeals court  
judge in Chicago, voiced doubts about whether the female diva persona  
should be taken seriously.

"I have a theory that the author is not a she, but a he," Judge  
Posner told The ABA Journal eReport. "The thing is exaggeratedly  
feminine and constantly drawing attention to her gender."

The judge was right. Article III Groupie turns out to be a 30-year- 
old prosecutor, David B. Lat. That was news to his employer, the  
Justice Department.

"It's fair to say that it came as a great surprise to many people in  
the U.S. attorney's office that David was the author of the blog,"  
said an official who insisted on anonymity, saying the situation was  
novel and under investigation.

Mr. Lat, a graduate of Harvard and the Yale Law School, did not  
respond to e-mail messages and did not return calls to his office,  
his home and his mobile phone. He explained to The New Yorker that he  
decided to come clean, because "I was putting a lot of time into this  
and was unable to get any credit for it."

Jeffrey Toobin, the author of the New Yorker article, said that he  
would not have published the article without Mr. Lat's cooperation.

Howard Bashman, a lawyer who runs How Appealing, a blog devoted to  
appellate litigation, said that Underneath Their Robes "was one of  
the most popular, gossipy and frivolous law blogs around."

But Mr. Bashman said he suspected that Mr. Lat, who appeared  
frequently in the federal appeals court in Philadelphia, was playing  
a dangerous game in commenting on the judges there.

Judge Posner, who contributes to a blog, said government employees  
should be free to blog.

"If he does it on his own time and does not compromise his official  
duties in some way, I don't see the problem," the judge said in an e- 
mail message. "We have free speech too, don't we?

"If Lat appears before judges whom he's made fun of in his blog or  
who may be offended by the blog (the humorless judges), then there  
might be a problem, though only a problem if he is 'outed' - and he  
outed himself!"


Easter Eggs :

Related Judge Kozinski's 'Nomination Letter'
- http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/15/politics/16text-blogs.html

New Yorker Article on Article III Groupie
- http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/051121ta_talk_toobin

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2021
January 2021
September 2020
January 2020
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
December 2018
June 2018
November 2017
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
September 2014
June 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
June 2013
April 2013
February 2013
October 2012
October 2010
April 2010
March 2010
December 2009
June 2009
April 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager