LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Archives


SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Home

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE  July 2006

SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE July 2006

Subject:

Last few days: Stop Approval of GE Plum Trees

From:

Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:45:35 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (164 lines)

From: Global Justice Ecology Project <[log in to unmask]>

Please forward widely

* URGENT: ONLY A FEW DAYS LEFT TO TELL TO THE USDA TO STOP GE PLUM TREES! *

Alert:  Stop the commercial planting of genetically engineered 
plums-the first temperate GE tree

(If you have not already done so, please follow the directions at the 
bottom of this email to inform the USDA of your opposition to GE plum 
trees before July 17th. )

The US Department of Agriculture is accepting public comments between 
now and July 17, 2006 on a petition that would allow commercial 
growing and marketing of the first genetically engineered (GE) plum 
trees. If approved, this would remove all regulatory oversight of 
this GE variety,  a virus-resistant plum tree known as the Honey 
Sweet Pox Potyvirus Resistant plum. This would open the door to GE 
varieties of many other related stone fruits, such as peaches, 
apricots, cherries and almonds, that are susceptible to the same 
virus. Ironically, this virus is not even found in the US today 
according to the USDA, and is certainly not a significant 
agricultural problem here.

  The USDA admits that this GE plum will contaminate both organic and 
conventional non-genetically engineered plum orchards if it is 
approved. Since all commercial plum trees are cultivars that are 
relatively cross compatible within the same species, Prunus 
domestica, contamination via GE plum pollen carried by bees and other 
insects will infiltrate the plum orchards of organic and conventional 
growers. The proposed buffer zones between GE plums and other plums 
will not prevent genetic contamination from being spread by 
pollinating insects.
Because this GE plum tree is also the first genetically engineered 
temperate tree proposed for commercial planting, it also opens the 
door to the commercialization of GE varieties of other temperate 
trees such as poplars, pines, and walnuts.

The one GE fruit tree that has previously been approved, a virus 
resistant Hawaiian papaya, has caused extensive contamination of 
organic, conventional and wild papaya orchards on most of the 
Hawaiian Islands in just a few years. This contamination has spread 
far more quickly than the USDA predicted in its initial assessment. 
Once native and cultivated plum varieties are contaminated with 
transgenic pollen, there is no calling it back.

  This petition has implications for all other GE tree species, as 
the USDA and the industry want to gauge what the public's reaction 
will be. It is critical that all concerned about the threat of GE 
foods and GE trees respond to this USDA petition.


[Comments to submit below.  Please add any additional comments of your own.]

The following comments are in reference to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0084

I oppose the deregulation of genetically engineered plum trees for 
the following reasons:

1. Genetic contamination is a serious threat. Flowers and fruit in 
organic and conventional plum orchards will become contaminated with 
GE plum genes via pollen transported by bees and other insects that 
travel many miles in search of pollen. The result is that organic and 
conventional plum growers will lose their markets for non-GE plums as 
DNA testing confirms the contamination, as it has with GE papayas in 
Hawaii. An organic tree might remain organic itself, but the fruit 
and seeds will become contaminated.

  2. The approval of GE plums would be a precedent setting step by 
USDA, opening the floodgates for more GE trees including fruit, nut, 
ornamental, and paper-pulp species, as well as trees engineered for 
soil remediation, and other traits. Approximately 80 species and 
varieties of trees are currently undergoing gene splicing research 
and development for commercial use.

3. There is a serious concern about the genetic stability of the 
inserted genes in GE plum trees. USDA claims that the plum pox viral 
resistance gene and other inserted genes are sufficiently genetically 
stable, but the testing has only been performed over ten years and 
not the entire pollen-producing life span of a plum tree. Over the 
life of a tree, an RNA virus such as plum pox is susceptible to many 
cycles of recombination, leading to the creation of new plant viruses 
that could infect a wide variety of plants. This can also occur with 
the viral DNA that has been inserted into these plums.

  4. The plum pox virus is not currently known to exist in the US as 
a problem for plum growers. Thus there is no justification for 
exposing other trees, plants, insects and people to the various 
hazards posed by GE plums.

  5.  The deregulatory petition completely ignores potential effects 
on bees and other pollinator species. There are no studies that would 
allow us to evaluate the potential hazards of GE tree pollen for a 
variety of insects, or for consumers of honey. We also do not know 
how animals and insects that browse on plum leaves might be affected.

6. The USDA's environmental assessment admits that the GE plum 
readily hybridizes within its species. Thus, there is a significant 
potential for gene flow into native plum varieties. Wild plum trees 
are perennial species living for several decades and populations 
exist in dozens of states from coast to coast.  GE plum trees will be 
long lived, and capable of contaminating orchards and native plum 
tree populations for several decades. One GE plum tree will be able 
to produce thousands of GE seeds and extensive quantities of GE 
pollen, and will be capable of spreading fertile GE plum seeds and 
pollen into the environment for many years. The petition did not 
adequately evaluate the relative fitness of GE plum varieties as 
compared to native plums; it is possible that the GE varieties would 
become more successful in natural settings, and out-compete non-GE 
varieties.  We challenge the USDA spurious claim that contamination 
would be positive by reducing potential reservoirs for harboring the 
plum pox virus in the wild.

  7. There has been no short-term or long-term safety testing or 
feeding trials for toxicity and other adverse effects of the genes 
inserted into the GE plum trees. GE plums have not been tested on 
animals, birds or humans for safety.  Toxicity tests are necessary 
since unintended genetic effects are known to occur with gene 
splicing. USDA has ignored the need for scientific studies of gene 
splicing and for comprehensive studies of the environmental 
consequences of GE plantings.

The US Department of Agriculture is accepting public comments between 
now and July 17, 2006 on the petition to formally deregulate and 
allow commercial growing and marketing of GE plums.

To submit your comments, send an original and three copies with your 
name and address to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0084, Regulatory Analysis 
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 
118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. If you wish to submit a comment using 
the Internet, go to http://www.regulations.gov. In the "Agency" box, 
select "Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service" from the 
drop-down menu; select "NOTICES" as the Document Type and 
APHIS-2006-0084 as the "Keyword or ID." Then press "submit" to submit 
or view public comments as well as the agency's supporting materials; 
click just beneath "Add Comments" and scroll down to submit your letter.

Feel free to copy and paste any or all of the 7 points above, along 
with any comments of your own.  Please forward this widely among your 
friends and other contacts.

Thanks for helping us STOP the genetic engineering of trees!
----------------------------------------------

STOP Genetically Engineered Trees Campaign
http://www.stopgetrees.org

A project of Global Justice Ecology Project
P.O. Box  412
  Hinesburg, VT  05461  U.S.
  +1.802.482.2689 ph/fax
<[log in to unmask]>
mailto:[log in to unmask]
http://www.globaljusticeecology.org

----------------------------------------------
Biotechnology Project
  c/o Institute for Social Ecology
  P.O. Box 93
  Plainfield, VT 05667
[log in to unmask]
----------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager