Eric Entemann wrote:
>
>Why would anyone use enriched uranium as cladding for a conventional 
>explosive shell?  Makes me suspect the author doesn't know what 
>he/she's talking about.

	I see no s/ option in this case.  The author is a he, noted 
for journalism on the Near & Middle E.  -  not so blatantly anti-USA 
as Chomsky or Pilger, but perhaps the next rank down.
	Like Eric, I had noticed the totally puzzling claim that U 
residues in this case were not depleted but *enriched*.  I hope we 
can get some sense on this later.  Meanwhile, Fisk is under suspicion 
for failure to get his story checked by a scientist knowledgeable on 
radioactivity.  It is, on its face, disinformation.

>
>   http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1935945.ece
>
>
>   Robert Fisk: Mystery of Israel's secret uranium bomb
>
>   Alarm over radioactive legacy left by attack on Lebanon
>
>