Eric Entemann wrote:
>Why would anyone use enriched uranium as cladding for a conventional
>explosive shell? Makes me suspect the author doesn't know what
>he/she's talking about.
I see no s/ option in this case. The author is a he, noted
for journalism on the Near & Middle E. - not so blatantly anti-USA
as Chomsky or Pilger, but perhaps the next rank down.
Like Eric, I had noticed the totally puzzling claim that U
residues in this case were not depleted but *enriched*. I hope we
can get some sense on this later. Meanwhile, Fisk is under suspicion
for failure to get his story checked by a scientist knowledgeable on
radioactivity. It is, on its face, disinformation.
> Robert Fisk: Mystery of Israel's secret uranium bomb
> Alarm over radioactive legacy left by attack on Lebanon