Is maybe the issue re: ARG-Blah and yuck that the plans are 25+ pages long? How can they be streamlined? Or can they be?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you received this communication in error and then delete it. Thank you.
>>> Steve Cavrak <[log in to unmask]> 10/24/2006 9:23 AM >>>
On Oct 24, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Robin Gouin wrote:
On Oct 24, 2006, at 8:57 AM, Vince Rossano added:
This inspired me to go searching for some the plans to see what was
blahish and yucky about them. I could find a list of the sites with
approved plans but not the plans themselves ... or even highlights ...
Maybe if this next round of planning were less "pre-webish" and more
"post-webish" (think wiki and web2.0 rather than dreamweaver and
front page) ... things could be more useful - e.g.
- make all plans public
- make all plans html (rather than pdf) to encourage reuse and
- encourage collaboration, sharing, and development
- encourage public review, comments, suggestions
- support using the plans within the individual schools, by
teachers, students, parents, community