The study abstract says: "Results from observational studies suggest
that micronutrient status is a determinant of the progression of
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease."
AND, "Multivitamins also resulted in significantly higher CD4+ and
CD8+ cell counts and significantly lower viral loads."
"Conclusions Multivitamin supplements delay the progression of HIV
disease and provide an effective, low-cost means of delaying the
initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected women."
Those are pretty strong statements. Funny that we don't hear much
talk about it, among the great push for pharmaceuticals as soon as possible.
At 02:52 AM 2/16/2007, you wrote:
>On second thought I have been too mild in my previous post. The
>article Mitchel posted completely misrepresents the findings of the
>NEJM study. Is it too much to ask that Mitchel check out the primary
>sources of what he posts rather than rely on secondary materials?
>That would be, um, the scientific way to do things.
>On 2/16/07, Mitchel Cohen
><<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>A Natural Answer to AIDS?
>On 1 July 2004, a landmark study by Harvard University
>was published in one of the world's leading medical journals,
>the New England Journal of Medicine, summed up
>the same day by the world's most influential and respected
>newspaper, the New York Times: 'The study found that
>daily doses of multivitamins slow down the disease and cut
>the risk of developing AIDS in half.'
>The question is why the people of South Africa have not been told about
>this. For actively promoting natural health approaches to AIDS, the
>South African government has continually been attacked by
>pharmaceutical interest groups and received no support at all from
>the medical establishment. The reason for this lack of support is
>obvious. Non-patentable natural therapies have very low profit
>margins, whereas patented synthetic pharmaceutical AIDS drugs are a
>multi-billion dollar business.
>It is high time that everyone in South Africa, whether affected by
>AIDS or not, knows the facts.
>1. The Harvard study, conducted in Tanzania over a period of eight
>years, involved more than a thousand HIV-positive pregnant women.
>It was a placebo controlled and double blind trial conforming to the
>highest standards. The study showed that inexpensive multivitamin
>treatment is more effective in staving off disease among HIV-positive
>women than any toxic AIDS drug. (NEMJ 2004 Jul 1;351(1):23-32)
>2. More than a decade ago, a study co-authored by two-time Nobel
>Prize winner Linus Pauling, published in another leading scientific
>journal, found that an optimal dose of vitamin C alone can block the
>replication of HIV by 99%. (Proceedings of the National Academy of
>Sciences of the United States of America 1990 Sep;87(18):7245-9)
>3. Every textbook of biochemistry recognises that vitamins and
>other micronutrients are the most decisive factor determining the
>optimum function of the immune system.
>4. Hundreds of studies have found that AZT is profoundly toxic to
>all cells of the human body, and particularly to the blood cells of our
>5. Numerous studies have found that children exposed to AZT in the
>womb suffer brain damage, neurological disorders, paralysis, spasticity,
>mental retardation, epilepsy, other serious diseases and early
>6. Incredibly, two weeks after the publication of the Harvard study,
>the Medicines Control Council proposed new regulations that will
>effectively prevent free access to life-saving vitamin therapy and
>information about it, and recommended that HIV-positive women
>take AZT during their pregnancies.
>Contributing Correspondent, Science
><mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]